You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@thrift.apache.org by Johan Oskarsson <jo...@oskarsson.nu> on 2009/02/25 13:23:42 UTC

Serialization comparison

Hi,

With the introduction of the more compact binary protocol in Thrift
(THRIFT-110) I thought it would be a good time to compare it to some of
the competitors. See this post for results:
http://blog.oskarsson.nu/2009/02/compact-and-cross-language.html

In short, Thrift does very well on the points of interest for me.

/Johan

Re: Serialization comparison

Posted by Bryan Duxbury <br...@rapleaf.com>.

Thanks for taking the time to do this comparison! In particular, I'm  
really pleased to see that the compact protocol retains impressive  
compressibility as compared to the binary protocol.

-Bryan

On Feb 25, 2009, at 4:23 AM, Johan Oskarsson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> With the introduction of the more compact binary protocol in Thrift
> (THRIFT-110) I thought it would be a good time to compare it to  
> some of
> the competitors. See this post for results:
> http://blog.oskarsson.nu/2009/02/compact-and-cross-language.html
>
> In short, Thrift does very well on the points of interest for me.
>
> /Johan