You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/08/15 19:13:31 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-811) SetPropertyAssumeTypeTest check for non-protected string array property

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Julian Reschke resolved JCR-811.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

This resolves the issue for my use cases. However there may be some other scenarios where the strategy of picking a random property type may prove problematic.


> SetPropertyAssumeTypeTest check for non-protected string array property
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-811
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-811
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JCR TCK
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> SetPropertyAssumeTypeTest.testValuesConstraintViolationExceptionBecauseOfInvalidTypeParameter tries to find a property definition for a writable, multivalued string property. It consults NodeTypeUtil.locatePropertyDef() for that purpose.
> In my setup, the property definition being returned is for jcr:valueConstraints, defined on nt:propertyDefinition. Nodes of that type in turn can not be created on the test node, thus the test fails already when trying to create the node.
> It seems the test suite tries to be too smart here. Can we change this so that the node type and the property name are configuration parameters?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.