Re: Question: Raising bugs on IBM JDK?

[Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Richard: That was a great help:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32871715/why-newglobalref-will-core-dump-on-jni-on-an-ibm-jdk/32905153#32905153

This confirms the fix I made as valid:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/18e41963b61a5ef6dbcdb150e27c07c062deaa66


And I helped a lot through this issue.. thanks:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/c89316623f4abf68911699160d24747898d7dd77

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Richard Kettelerij <
richardkettelerij@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Clebert,
>
> As far as I know IBM doesn't have a public issue tracker for JVM issues.
> But I do know someone from the IBM JVM team reached out to the guys from
> ElasticSearch since they were (also) having some trouble with the IBM JVM.
> See
>
> https://discuss.elastic.co/t/need-help-with-ibm-jdk-issues-with-es-1-4-5/1748/5
> for a reply by George Chan from the IBM JVM team. He suggests posting
> issues to https://developer.ibm.com/answers/questions with hashtag
> #IBMJDK.
> Maybe you can do the same or try to contact him directly?
>
> Regards,
> Richard
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone knows a place to raise issues on the IBM JDK?
> >
> >
> > The IBM JDK will core dump if you create a global Ref for MethodIDs on
> the
> > JNI. This behaves fine on the Sun JDK and will cause a GPF / core dumped
> on
> > a IBM JDK.
> >
> >
> >  Even thought I didn't apparently need the Gobal Ref on the Method ID, it
> > would be nice to raise this issue there.
> >
> >
> > I'm fixing this on the Artemis Native code.. and it would be nice to
> raise
> > this as an issue on the IBM JDK.
> >
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: Question: Raising bugs on IBM JDK?

[Richard Kettelerij <ri...@gmail.com>]

Glad I could help

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Richard: That was a great help:
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32871715/why-newglobalref-will-core-dump-on-jni-on-an-ibm-jdk/32905153#32905153
>
> This confirms the fix I made as valid:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/18e41963b61a5ef6dbcdb150e27c07c062deaa66
>
>
> And I helped a lot through this issue.. thanks:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/c89316623f4abf68911699160d24747898d7dd77
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Richard Kettelerij <
> richardkettelerij@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Clebert,
> >
> > As far as I know IBM doesn't have a public issue tracker for JVM issues.
> > But I do know someone from the IBM JVM team reached out to the guys from
> > ElasticSearch since they were (also) having some trouble with the IBM
> JVM.
> > See
> >
> >
> https://discuss.elastic.co/t/need-help-with-ibm-jdk-issues-with-es-1-4-5/1748/5
> > for a reply by George Chan from the IBM JVM team. He suggests posting
> > issues to https://developer.ibm.com/answers/questions with hashtag
> > #IBMJDK.
> > Maybe you can do the same or try to contact him directly?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Richard
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone knows a place to raise issues on the IBM JDK?
> > >
> > >
> > > The IBM JDK will core dump if you create a global Ref for MethodIDs on
> > the
> > > JNI. This behaves fine on the Sun JDK and will cause a GPF / core
> dumped
> > on
> > > a IBM JDK.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Even thought I didn't apparently need the Gobal Ref on the Method ID,
> it
> > > would be nice to raise this issue there.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm fixing this on the Artemis Native code.. and it would be nice to
> > raise
> > > this as an issue on the IBM JDK.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>