Re: Dependency on WebApplicationContext

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>]

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler skrev:
>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>
>>> After you made the Settings object available on its own the Core doesn't 
>>> seem to be used much anymore. So it seem like a good idea to remove it. 
>>> The only remaining use seem to be as a shielding of the 
>>> EnvironmentHelper. What is your plan for that functionality?
>>>
>> I think we can make this available through the BeanFactory as well; but
>> I'm not sure if this is a proper use of a bean factory. So basically,
>> you have to lookup the bean each time you use it. WDYT?
> 
> I'm not certain either. The solution with you choose with a statically 
> available thread local, lead to less code, so it seem like a good 
> solution :)
> 
Yes :) Now, the idea with the Core object was to provide a "cleaner"
interface to the static methods. I think, I'll create a utility class
with static methods that wrap the environment helper stuff. This allows
us to later change the internal stuff (environment helper etc) if
required with breaking any api.

Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/