You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nuttx.apache.org by bryan costanich <br...@wildernesslabs.co> on 2021/02/03 18:42:09 UTC

Anyone working on an MCUBoot Port for NuttX?

Our interests align, maybe we can help? Ping me. :)

Re: Anyone working on an MCUBoot Port for NuttX?

Posted by Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:50 PM bryan costanich <br...@wildernesslabs.co>
wrote:

> Our interests align, maybe we can help? Ping me. :)
>
This looks interesting. Very interesting. I have not heard of MCUBoot
before. Apache2 license (that's what it says on the GitHub) so I suppose
we're compatible on that aspect. Also works with Zephyr and Mynewt, so no
reason NuttX should be left out.

I'd like to study this further; at the moment I've been distracted from
NuttX by the upcoming release of Subversion, expected within days. Once we
get that out the door I need to focus on the license clearing here in
NuttX-land. After that, I want to look into this bootloader.

Thanks for bringing it to this list...

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: Anyone working on an MCUBoot Port for NuttX?

Posted by Erik Englund <er...@innoware.se>.
One important thing to have in mind is to keep it fully compatible with
other RTOS. There are lots of products shipped with MCUBoot using Zephyr
RTOS / other OS.
If it is possible to sign and boot a NuttX application on a MCUBoot
bootloader that is built on top of Zephyr, there are a much greater
possibility for companies to try NuttX as it's just a firmware update
thing, instead of a complete change of bootloader.


Med vänlig hälsning
Erik Englund

Innoware Development AB
Hyttvägen 13
73338 SALA


Org.nr. 556790-2977
www.innoware.se


Den ons 3 feb. 2021 kl 21:50 skrev bryan costanich <bryan@wildernesslabs.co
>:

> Our interests align, maybe we can help? Ping me. :)
>