You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Fürtbauer Wolfgang <w....@utanet.at> on 2014/08/29 10:29:57 UTC
remove_header not working?
Dear all,
I'd like to remove the X-Spam-Report header for mails in case of ham
therefore I added
remove_header ham Report
to my local.cf
But still ham messages have the X-Spam-Report header?!
What am I doing wrong?
SpamAssassin Server version 3.4.0
running on Perl 5.10.0
with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.38)
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.064)
Thanks in advance
Wolfgang
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Fürtbauer Tel: +43 7612 77620
Steinbichlstrasse 58d Mobil: +43 664 8332326
4812 Pinsdorf E-Mail: w.fuertbauer@gmx.at
Austria
Re: remove_header not working?
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 11:46 +0200, Axb wrote:
> Those reports are "added" by Exim's interface which does not seem to
> respect the local.cf directives.
Exim accessing SA template tags?
> On 08/29/2014 11:29 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
> > unfortunatelly not, X-Spam-Reports are still there
If the option report_safe 0 is set, SA automatically adds a Report
header, though only to spam. Equivalent
add_header spam Report _REPORT_
The following is not only added to ham, but its contents are not the
_REPORT_ template tag but resemble the default "report" template, the
body text used for spam with report_safe 1.
There is no template tag to access the "report" template. Thus, this
header must be defined somewhere in the configuration, complete with all
that text, embedded \n newlines and _PREVIEW_ and _SUMMARY_ template
tags.
> > X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
> > "hausmeister.intern.luisesteiner.at",
> > has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
> > message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
> > similar future email. If you have any questions, see
> > postmaster for details.
> >
> > Content preview: [...]
> > Content analysis details: (-221.0 points, 5.0 required)
> >
> > pts rule name description
> > ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> > -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
> > X-Spam-Report: Software zur Erkennung von "Spam" auf dem Rechner
> > aohsupport02.asamer.holding.ah
Are there really *two* X-Spam-Report headers?
Also, why is this one in German? SA doesn't mix languages during a
single run.
Why do the hostnames differ?
And, well, which hostmaster fat-fingered that ccTLD?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: remove_header not working?
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
please keep list mail on the list.
Those reports are "added" by Exim's interface which does not seem to
respect the local.cf directives.
Maybe some Exim user can help you further, either on the SA or if not on
the Exim list.
Sorry, can't help further...
On 08/29/2014 11:29 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
> unfortunatelly not, X-Spam-Reports are still there
>
>
> I added these lines on the senders side (hostname hausmeister) ..
> receiver is aohsupport01
>
> <snip>
> X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
> "hausmeister.intern.luisesteiner.at",
> has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
> message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
> similar future email. If you have any questions, see
> postmaster for details.
>
> Content preview: Forwarded message Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:32:23
> +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wolfgang Fürtbauer <wo...@luisesteiner.at> To: wolfgang
> Fuertbauer
> <wo...@luisesteiner.at> Subject: tewst (fwd) [...]
>
> Content analysis details: (-221.0 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
> -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
> -100 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a
> shortcircuited rule
> -20 SC_HAM No description available.
>
> ...
>
> X-Spam-Report: Software zur Erkennung von "Spam" auf dem Rechner
>
> aohsupport02.asamer.holding.ah
>
> hat die eingegangene E-mail als m▒gliche "Spam"-Nachricht identifiziert.
> Die urspr▒ngliche Nachricht wurde an diesen Bericht angeh▒ngt, so dass
> Sie sie anschauen k▒nnen (falls es doch eine legitime E-Mail ist) oder
> ▒hnliche unerw▒nschte Nachrichten in Zukunft markieren k▒nnen.
> Bei Fragen zu diesem Vorgang wenden Sie sich bitte an
>
> postmaster
>
> Vorschau: Forwarded message Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wolfgang Fürtbauer <wo...@luisesteiner.at> To: wolfgang
> Fuertbauer
> <wo...@luisesteiner.at> Subject: tewst (fwd) [...]
>
> Inhaltsanalyse im Detail: (-1.1 Punkte, 5.0 ben▒tigt)
>
> Pkte Regelname Beschreibung
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: Senderechner entspricht SPF-Datensatz
> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach
> Bayes-Test: 0-1%
> [score: 0.0000]
> 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host
> with no rDNS
>
> This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
> while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware
> tools.
>
> Am 29.08.2014 11:08, schrieb Axb:
>> On 08/29/2014 11:00 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to remove "my own" X-Spam-Report for ham mails leaving my
>>> organisation in order not to bother the other party.
>>> I had serveral mails returned because of the X-Spam-Reports
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20
>>> hex):
>>> X-Spam-Report: ... postmaster for details.\n \n Content previ[...]
>>>
>>> <snap>
>>>
>>> my only add_header line is:
>>>
>>> add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
>>> tests=_TESTS_ shortcircuit=_SCTYPE_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_
>>> version=_VERSION_"
>>>
>>> glue is spamd called from exim
>>>
>>
>> remove your "remove_header ham Report "
>>
>> try this in local.cf
>>
>> report_safe 0
>> clear_headers
>> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
>>
>> # This should be in one line
>> add_header spam Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
>> tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
>>
>> add_header spam Level _STARS(*)_
>> add_header spam Report _REPORT_
>>
>>
>> this "should" prevent adding those SA headers to msgs below threshold
>>
>>
>
Re: remove_header not working?
Posted by Fürtbauer Wolfgang <w....@utanet.at>.
Hi,
I'm trying to remove "my own" X-Spam-Report for ham mails leaving my
organisation in order not to bother the other party.
I had serveral mails returned because of the X-Spam-Reports
<snip>
Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex):
X-Spam-Report: ... postmaster for details.\n \n Content previ[...]
<snap>
my only add_header line is:
add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
tests=_TESTS_ shortcircuit=_SCTYPE_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_"
glue is spamd called from exim
BR
Wolfgang
Am 29.08.2014 10:48, schrieb Axb:
> On 08/29/2014 10:29 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'd like to remove the X-Spam-Report header for mails in case of ham
>>
>> therefore I added
>>
>> remove_header ham Report
>>
>> to my local.cf
>>
>> But still ham messages have the X-Spam-Report header?!
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> SpamAssassin Server version 3.4.0
>> running on Perl 5.10.0
>> with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.38)
>> with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.064)
>
>
> iirc, remove_header removes headers added by a previous SA instance
> (sender's, for example)
>
> What exactly are you trying to achieve?
> What other add_header lines do you have in local.cf?
> what glue are you using to interface your MTA with SA?
>
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Fürtbauer Tel: +43 7612 77620
Steinbichlstrasse 58d Mobil: +43 664 8332326
4812 Pinsdorf E-Mail: w.fuertbauer@gmx.at
Austria
Re: remove_header not working?
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 08/29/2014 10:29 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'd like to remove the X-Spam-Report header for mails in case of ham
>
> therefore I added
>
> remove_header ham Report
>
> to my local.cf
>
> But still ham messages have the X-Spam-Report header?!
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> SpamAssassin Server version 3.4.0
> running on Perl 5.10.0
> with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.38)
> with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.064)
iirc, remove_header removes headers added by a previous SA instance
(sender's, for example)
What exactly are you trying to achieve?
What other add_header lines do you have in local.cf?
what glue are you using to interface your MTA with SA?