You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Johnson Jeba Asir <jo...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/29 07:00:28 UTC
Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Hi All,
First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
are moved some where?
www.rulesemporium.com resolved to 72.52.4.74, but ping failed for me,
Thanks in advance
Regards,
a.Johnson
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Ed Kasky <ed...@esson.net>.
At 12:39 PM Friday, 2/29/2008, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=>
>Hi!
>
>>>The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
>>>The web site in the subject line has denial of service
>>>protection. It may be reachable by some and unreachable to others.
>
>>How then would you explain why it worked just fine up until some
>>point this week? Has the denial of serevice protection been
>>tightened up even more??
>
>In fact, yes, they are doing upgrades and are part of another
>company. So they might be migrating services.
>
>Anyway, its a free service isnt it. If its not there you just have
>to sit and wait. ;)
>
>And like told, none of the SARE sets were changed in 2008 anyway, so
>no need to check.
Now that was just too logical of an explanation ;-)
Thanks!
Ed Kasky
~~~~~~~~~
Randomly Generated Quote (214 of 576):
"We should keep so close to the facts that we never have to
remember the second time what we said the first time."
- F. Marion Smith
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.
Hi!
>> The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
>>
>> The web site in the subject line has denial of service protection. It may
>> be reachable by some and unreachable to others.
> How then would you explain why it worked just fine up until some point this
> week? Has the denial of serevice protection been tightened up even more??
In fact, yes, they are doing upgrades and are part of another company. So
they might be migrating services.
Anyway, its a free service isnt it. If its not there you just have to sit
and wait. ;)
And like told, none of the SARE sets were changed in 2008 anyway, so no
need to check.
Bye,
Raymond.
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Ed Kasky <ed...@esson.net>.
At 11:20 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, SM wrote -=>
>At 05:09 29-02-2008, Ed Kasky wrote:
>>Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was
>>80 degrees yesterday:
>
>The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
>
>The web site in the subject line has denial of service
>protection. It may be reachable by some and unreachable to others.
How then would you explain why it worked just fine up until some
point this week? Has the denial of serevice protection been
tightened up even more??
Ed Kasky
~~~~~~~~~
Randomly Generated Quote (491 of 576):
The greatest of faults, I should say, is to be conscious of none.
-Thomas Carlyle, writer (1795-1881)
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by SM <sm...@resistor.net>.
At 05:09 29-02-2008, Ed Kasky wrote:
>Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was
>80 degrees yesterday:
The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
The web site in the subject line has denial of service
protection. It may be reachable by some and unreachable to others.
Regards,
-sm
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Luis Hernán Otegui <lu...@gmail.com>.
Well, same here, from Argentina
2008/2/29, DAve <da...@pixelhammer.com>:
> User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> > I have the same problem here:
> >
> > traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
> > packets
> > 1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
> > 2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
> > 3 0.so-4-3-0.XT2.POR3.ALTER.NET (152.63.104.254) 3.397 ms 3.131 ms 3.121 ms
> > 4 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.SJC7.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.146) 17.919 ms 17.896 ms 17.895 ms
> > 5 POS7-0-0.GW4.SJC7.ALTER.NET (152.63.48.245) 19.365 ms 19.351 ms 19.328 ms
> > 6 teliasonera-test-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.215.70) 21.223 ms 21.364 ms 21.248 ms
> > 7 las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.17) 30.684 ms 30.711 ms 30.628 ms
> > 8 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 71.889 ms 71.869 ms 71.875 ms
> > 9 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 98.787 ms 98.759 ms 98.765 ms
> > 10 * * *
> >
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, David Filion wrote:
> >
> >> Ed Kasky wrote:
> >>> At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
> >>>
> >>>>> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> >>>>> are moved some where?
> >>>> Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
> >>>> which pings fine as well.
> >>> Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was 80
> >>> degrees yesterday:
> >>>
> >>> traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> >>> 1 ns5gt.wrenkasky.com (10.10.10.1) 0.620 ms 0.809 ms 1.058 ms
> >>> 2 router.wrenkasky.com (216.102.129.41) 13.910 ms 19.470 ms 24.269 ms
> >>> 3 dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (67.114.50.66) 29.160 ms 34.044
> >>> ms 38.922 ms
> >>> 4 bb2-g10-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.92.198) 85.450 ms 86.375
> >>> ms 87.311 ms
> >>> 5 151.164.93.167 (151.164.93.167) 70.757 ms 71.946 ms 72.868 ms
> >>> 6 151.164.251.214 (151.164.251.214) 74.810 ms 76.133 ms 80.781 ms
> >>> 7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms
> >>> 71.572 ms
> >>> 8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms
> >>> 107.478 ms
> >>> 9 * * *
> >>> 10 * * *
> >>> 11 * * *
> >>> 12 * * *
>
>
> Same result from Indiana USA, dies at telia.net.
Dies at Telia...
>
> DAve
>
>
> --
> Google finally, after 7 years, provided a logo for
> veterans. Thank you Google. What to do with my signature now?
>
Luis
--
-------------------------------------------------
GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You...
Linux Registered User #448382.
When I grow up, I wanna be like Theo...
-------------------------------------------------
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by DAve <da...@pixelhammer.com>.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> I have the same problem here:
>
> traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
> packets
> 1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
> 2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
> 3 0.so-4-3-0.XT2.POR3.ALTER.NET (152.63.104.254) 3.397 ms 3.131 ms 3.121 ms
> 4 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.SJC7.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.146) 17.919 ms 17.896 ms 17.895 ms
> 5 POS7-0-0.GW4.SJC7.ALTER.NET (152.63.48.245) 19.365 ms 19.351 ms 19.328 ms
> 6 teliasonera-test-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.215.70) 21.223 ms 21.364 ms 21.248 ms
> 7 las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.17) 30.684 ms 30.711 ms 30.628 ms
> 8 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 71.889 ms 71.869 ms 71.875 ms
> 9 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 98.787 ms 98.759 ms 98.765 ms
> 10 * * *
>
>
> Ken
>
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, David Filion wrote:
>
>> Ed Kasky wrote:
>>> At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
>>>
>>>>> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
>>>>> are moved some where?
>>>> Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
>>>> which pings fine as well.
>>> Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was 80
>>> degrees yesterday:
>>>
>>> traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>>> 1 ns5gt.wrenkasky.com (10.10.10.1) 0.620 ms 0.809 ms 1.058 ms
>>> 2 router.wrenkasky.com (216.102.129.41) 13.910 ms 19.470 ms 24.269 ms
>>> 3 dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (67.114.50.66) 29.160 ms 34.044
>>> ms 38.922 ms
>>> 4 bb2-g10-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.92.198) 85.450 ms 86.375
>>> ms 87.311 ms
>>> 5 151.164.93.167 (151.164.93.167) 70.757 ms 71.946 ms 72.868 ms
>>> 6 151.164.251.214 (151.164.251.214) 74.810 ms 76.133 ms 80.781 ms
>>> 7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms
>>> 71.572 ms
>>> 8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms
>>> 107.478 ms
>>> 9 * * *
>>> 10 * * *
>>> 11 * * *
>>> 12 * * *
Same result from Indiana USA, dies at telia.net.
DAve
--
Google finally, after 7 years, provided a logo for
veterans. Thank you Google. What to do with my signature now?
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by User for SpamAssassin Mail List <sp...@pcez.com>.
I have the same problem here:
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
3 0.so-4-3-0.XT2.POR3.ALTER.NET (152.63.104.254) 3.397 ms 3.131 ms 3.121 ms
4 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.SJC7.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.146) 17.919 ms 17.896 ms 17.895 ms
5 POS7-0-0.GW4.SJC7.ALTER.NET (152.63.48.245) 19.365 ms 19.351 ms 19.328 ms
6 teliasonera-test-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.215.70) 21.223 ms 21.364 ms 21.248 ms
7 las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.17) 30.684 ms 30.711 ms 30.628 ms
8 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 71.889 ms 71.869 ms 71.875 ms
9 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 98.787 ms 98.759 ms 98.765 ms
10 * * *
Ken
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, David Filion wrote:
> Ed Kasky wrote:
> > At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
> >
> >>> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> >>> are moved some where?
> >>
> >> Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
> >> which pings fine as well.
> >
> > Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was 80
> > degrees yesterday:
> >
> > traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> > 1 ns5gt.wrenkasky.com (10.10.10.1) 0.620 ms 0.809 ms 1.058 ms
> > 2 router.wrenkasky.com (216.102.129.41) 13.910 ms 19.470 ms 24.269 ms
> > 3 dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (67.114.50.66) 29.160 ms 34.044
> > ms 38.922 ms
> > 4 bb2-g10-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.92.198) 85.450 ms 86.375
> > ms 87.311 ms
> > 5 151.164.93.167 (151.164.93.167) 70.757 ms 71.946 ms 72.868 ms
> > 6 151.164.251.214 (151.164.251.214) 74.810 ms 76.133 ms 80.781 ms
> > 7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms
> > 71.572 ms
> > 8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms
> > 107.478 ms
> > 9 * * *
> > 10 * * *
> > 11 * * *
> > 12 * * *
> > --snip--
> > 30 * * *
> >
> >
>
> Half / half here.
>
> From one server it doesn't work:
>
> traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 heroine.xprima.com (207.96.225.62) 0.621 ms 0.649 ms 0.695 ms
> 2 ia-piex-gw06-vl1219.vtl.net (207.253.197.1) 1.667 ms 1.366 ms 0.978 ms
> 3 216.113.123.9 (216.113.123.9) 1.721 ms 1.593 ms 1.248 ms
> 4 ia-piex-bb04-pos11-0-0-cpe082.vtl.net (216.113.122.82) 14.211 ms * *
> 5 sl-tisca1-60020-0.sprintlink.net (144.223.37.150) 11.102 ms 11.099 ms
> 23.997 ms
> 6 so-0-0-0.mia11.ip.tiscali.net (89.149.186.45) 46.055 ms 46.032 ms
> 46.057 ms
> 7 prolexic-gw.ip.tiscali.net (213.200.73.38) 46.046 ms 46.059 ms 45.550 ms
> 8 * * *
> 9 * * *
> --snip--
> 30 * * *
>
>
> From a second server it does:
>
> traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
> 1 erx02.tor.pppoe.ca (206.248.154.120) 52.137 ms 47.751 ms 49.089 ms
> 2 i2110.border1.pppoe.ca (206.248.155.249) 48.226 ms 47.784 ms 47.483 ms
> 3 65.39.198.249 (65.39.198.249) 46.819 ms 48.314 ms 47.175 ms
> 4 oc48-po4-0.nyc-telx-dis-2.peer1.net (216.187.115.126) 56.828 ms 57.145
> ms 56.887 ms
> 5 oc48-po3-0.nyc-75bre-dis-1.peer1.net (216.187.115.134) 58.735 ms 57.571
> ms 58.153 ms
> 6 oc48-po2-0.wdc-eqx-dis-1.peer1.net (216.187.115.54) 63.232 ms 64.553 ms
> 63.534 ms
> 7 * * *
> 8 unknown.hwng.net (69.16.190.161) 85.520 ms 86.509 ms 85.609 ms
> 9 1-1.r1.lo.hwng.net (69.16.191.50) 153.904 ms 154.564 ms 154.897 ms
> 10 unknown.hwng.net (69.16.189.66) 148.284 ms 148.410 ms 148.168 ms
> 11 unknown.prolexic.com (209.200.156.34) 147.512 ms 148.232 ms 148.250 ms
> 12 unknown.prolexic.com (72.52.4.74) 147.229 ms 148.328 ms 148.167 ms
>
>
>
> David
>
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by David Filion <df...@auto123.com>.
Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
>
>>> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
>>> are moved some where?
>>
>> Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
>> which pings fine as well.
>
> Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was 80
> degrees yesterday:
>
> traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 ns5gt.wrenkasky.com (10.10.10.1) 0.620 ms 0.809 ms 1.058 ms
> 2 router.wrenkasky.com (216.102.129.41) 13.910 ms 19.470 ms 24.269 ms
> 3 dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (67.114.50.66) 29.160 ms 34.044
> ms 38.922 ms
> 4 bb2-g10-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.92.198) 85.450 ms 86.375
> ms 87.311 ms
> 5 151.164.93.167 (151.164.93.167) 70.757 ms 71.946 ms 72.868 ms
> 6 151.164.251.214 (151.164.251.214) 74.810 ms 76.133 ms 80.781 ms
> 7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms
> 71.572 ms
> 8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms
> 107.478 ms
> 9 * * *
> 10 * * *
> 11 * * *
> 12 * * *
> --snip--
> 30 * * *
>
>
Half / half here.
From one server it doesn't work:
traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 heroine.xprima.com (207.96.225.62) 0.621 ms 0.649 ms 0.695 ms
2 ia-piex-gw06-vl1219.vtl.net (207.253.197.1) 1.667 ms 1.366 ms 0.978 ms
3 216.113.123.9 (216.113.123.9) 1.721 ms 1.593 ms 1.248 ms
4 ia-piex-bb04-pos11-0-0-cpe082.vtl.net (216.113.122.82) 14.211 ms * *
5 sl-tisca1-60020-0.sprintlink.net (144.223.37.150) 11.102 ms 11.099 ms
23.997 ms
6 so-0-0-0.mia11.ip.tiscali.net (89.149.186.45) 46.055 ms 46.032 ms
46.057 ms
7 prolexic-gw.ip.tiscali.net (213.200.73.38) 46.046 ms 46.059 ms 45.550 ms
8 * * *
9 * * *
--snip--
30 * * *
From a second server it does:
traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 erx02.tor.pppoe.ca (206.248.154.120) 52.137 ms 47.751 ms 49.089 ms
2 i2110.border1.pppoe.ca (206.248.155.249) 48.226 ms 47.784 ms 47.483 ms
3 65.39.198.249 (65.39.198.249) 46.819 ms 48.314 ms 47.175 ms
4 oc48-po4-0.nyc-telx-dis-2.peer1.net (216.187.115.126) 56.828 ms 57.145
ms 56.887 ms
5 oc48-po3-0.nyc-75bre-dis-1.peer1.net (216.187.115.134) 58.735 ms 57.571
ms 58.153 ms
6 oc48-po2-0.wdc-eqx-dis-1.peer1.net (216.187.115.54) 63.232 ms 64.553 ms
63.534 ms
7 * * *
8 unknown.hwng.net (69.16.190.161) 85.520 ms 86.509 ms 85.609 ms
9 1-1.r1.lo.hwng.net (69.16.191.50) 153.904 ms 154.564 ms 154.897 ms
10 unknown.hwng.net (69.16.189.66) 148.284 ms 148.410 ms 148.168 ms
11 unknown.prolexic.com (209.200.156.34) 147.512 ms 148.232 ms 148.250 ms
12 unknown.prolexic.com (72.52.4.74) 147.229 ms 148.328 ms 148.167 ms
David
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Ed Kasky <ed...@esson.net>.
At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
>>I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
>>are moved some where?
>
>Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
>which pings fine as well.
Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was 80
degrees yesterday:
traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 ns5gt.wrenkasky.com (10.10.10.1) 0.620 ms 0.809 ms 1.058 ms
2 router.wrenkasky.com (216.102.129.41) 13.910 ms 19.470 ms 24.269 ms
3 dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (67.114.50.66) 29.160
ms 34.044 ms 38.922 ms
4 bb2-g10-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.92.198) 85.450
ms 86.375 ms 87.311 ms
5 151.164.93.167 (151.164.93.167) 70.757 ms 71.946 ms 72.868 ms
6 151.164.251.214 (151.164.251.214) 74.810 ms 76.133 ms 80.781 ms
7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms 71.572 ms
8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms 107.478 ms
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
--snip--
30 * * *
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Randomly Generated Quote (1178 of 1364):
This world is divided roughly into three kinds of nations: those that spend
lots of money to keep their weight down; those whose people eat to live;
and those whose people don't know where their next meal is coming from.
-David S. Landes, author, professor of economics and history (1924- )
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Blaine Fleming <gr...@digital-z.com>.
> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> are moved some where?
Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
which pings fine as well.
--Blaine
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Johnson Jeba Asir <jo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, then It must be a ISP issue, will take up with ISP
Regards,
a.Johnson
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Yet Another Ninja <sa...@alexb.ch> wrote:
>
> On 2/29/2008 9:01 AM, ram wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:30 +0530, Johnson Jeba Asir wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
> >>
> >> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> >> are moved some where?
> >>
> >> www.rulesemporium.com resolved to 72.52.4.74, but ping failed for me,
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> a.Johnson
> >
> >
> > Apparently yes.
> > Not able to reach rulesemporium from any of my idcs
>
> run trace and report to your ISP.
> possibly a bad route....
>
> anyway, no SARE rule files have been updated in .....months, weeks?
>
> its more than enough if you check once a month...
> if there's an update it will be announced here.
>
>
>
>
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by Yet Another Ninja <sa...@alexb.ch>.
On 2/29/2008 9:01 AM, ram wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:30 +0530, Johnson Jeba Asir wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
>>
>> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
>> are moved some where?
>>
>> www.rulesemporium.com resolved to 72.52.4.74, but ping failed for me,
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Regards,
>> a.Johnson
>
>
> Apparently yes.
> Not able to reach rulesemporium from any of my idcs
run trace and report to your ISP.
possibly a bad route....
anyway, no SARE rule files have been updated in .....months, weeks?
its more than enough if you check once a month...
if there's an update it will be announced here.
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Posted by ram <ra...@netcore.co.in>.
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:30 +0530, Johnson Jeba Asir wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
>
> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> are moved some where?
>
> www.rulesemporium.com resolved to 72.52.4.74, but ping failed for me,
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Regards,
> a.Johnson
Apparently yes.
Not able to reach rulesemporium from any of my idcs
Thanks
Ram