You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Sunitha Kambhampati <ks...@gmail.com> on 2005/10/19 19:27:05 UTC

some test failures on 10.1 codeline

Hi All,

I merged one of my changes and  ran derbyall on my local 10.1 codeline 
with insane classes.
Following four tests failed ( and I think they are not related to my 
changes)
derbyall/derbyall.fail:i18n/JapanCodeConversion.sql
derbyall/derbyall.fail:i18n/iepnegativetests_ES.sql
derbyall/derbynetclientmats/derbynetmats.fail:tools/importExport.java
derbyall/derbynetmats/derbynetmats.fail:tools/importExport.java

The first two are related to the updated translation messages checkin 
and seem like master updates and that is OK.  

The importExport.java test is what I am concernced about.  The diff is

*** Start: importExport jdk1.4.2 DerbyNetClient 
derbynetmats:derbynetmats 2005-10-18 23:35:13 ***
16 del
< The exception 'java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError' was thrown while 
evaluating an expression. SQLSTATE: XJ001: Java exception: ': 
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError'. SQLSTATE: XJ001: Java exception: 
'access denied (java.lang.RuntimePermission charsetProvider): 
java.security.AccessControlException'.
16a16
 > An IOException occurred while writing data to the file.
Test Failed.

I dont see anything interesting in other logs except in derby.log where 
writing data to file on export is throwing the IOException.

But when I reran these tests individually, they passed  OK.

Has anyone else come across this ?   I am re-running only the 
derbynetclientmats suite  to see if this test will fail or not.

Thanks,
Sunitha.

Re: some test failures on 10.1 codeline

Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
On 10/19/05, Sunitha Kambhampati <ks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>
> >Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Sunitha Kambhampati wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>>Has anyone else come across this ? I am re-running only the
> >>>derbynetclientmats suite to see if this test will fail or not.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >FYI
> >
> >Yesterday before my commits to 10.1 I ran derbynetclientmats against
> >insane and classes directory and the only failure was
> >lang/forUpdate.sql. The importExport test passed.
> >
> >
> >
> I re-ran the derbynetclientmats suite and derbynetmats suite on my local
> 10.1 codeline and* all tests passed.*
>
> Environment : windows 2k - T40 laptop.
> java version "1.4.2"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2)
> Classic VM (build 1.4.2, J2RE 1.4.2 IBM Windows 32 build
> cn142sr1a-20050209 (JIT
> enabled: jitc))
>
> Thanks,
> Sunitha.
>

Hi...
 This was apparently a problem due to some versions of the ibm 1.4.2 jvm.
Back in February I submitted a patch for 2 canons for ibm14 for
networkserver - but I can now not remember what - if any -research I did
that led me to just accept these differences.
 Either way, with newer releases of the ibm142 jvm the behavior is once
again identical to the sun jvm.
 We may need to get rid of the ibm14 canons
<branch>/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/DerbyNet/ibm14/importExport.out
<branch>/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/DerbyNetClient/ibm14/importExport.out
We may need to document the need for this later release somehow.
 Myrna

Re: some test failures on 10.1 codeline

Posted by Sunitha Kambhampati <ks...@gmail.com>.
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Sunitha Kambhampati wrote:
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>>Has anyone else come across this ?   I am re-running only the
>>>derbynetclientmats suite  to see if this test will fail or not.
>>>      
>>>
>
>FYI
>
>Yesterday before my commits to 10.1 I ran derbynetclientmats against
>insane and classes directory and the only failure was
>lang/forUpdate.sql. The importExport test passed.
>
>  
>
I re-ran the derbynetclientmats suite and derbynetmats suite on my local 
10.1 codeline and* all tests passed.*

Environment :  windows 2k - T40 laptop.
java version "1.4.2"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2)
Classic VM (build 1.4.2, J2RE 1.4.2 IBM Windows 32 build 
cn142sr1a-20050209 (JIT
 enabled: jitc))

Thanks,
Sunitha.

Re: some test failures on 10.1 codeline

Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>.
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

> Sunitha Kambhampati wrote:

>>Has anyone else come across this ?   I am re-running only the
>>derbynetclientmats suite  to see if this test will fail or not.

FYI

Yesterday before my commits to 10.1 I ran derbynetclientmats against
insane and classes directory and the only failure was
lang/forUpdate.sql. The importExport test passed.

Dan.


Re: some test failures on 10.1 codeline

Posted by Sunitha Kambhampati <ks...@gmail.com>.
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>Sunitha Kambhampati wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>>derbyall/derbynetclientmats/derbynetmats.fail:tools/importExport.java
>>derbyall/derbynetmats/derbynetmats.fail:tools/importExport.java
>>
>>The first two are related to the updated translation messages checkin
>>and seem like master updates and that is OK. 
>>The importExport.java test is what I am concernced about.  The diff is
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>But when I reran these tests individually, they passed  OK.
>>    
>>
>
>Individually within the network frameworks, or as an embedded test?
>
>  
>
I re-ran these tests within the network frameworks (both DerbyNet, and 
DerbyNetClient) and they passed OK.

>  
>
>>Has anyone else come across this ?   I am re-running only the
>>derbynetclientmats suite  to see if this test will fail or not.
>>    
>>
>
>I'll look into it.
>
>  
>
Thanks.

Sunitha.


Re: some test failures on 10.1 codeline

Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>.
Sunitha Kambhampati wrote:


> derbyall/derbynetclientmats/derbynetmats.fail:tools/importExport.java
> derbyall/derbynetmats/derbynetmats.fail:tools/importExport.java
> 
> The first two are related to the updated translation messages checkin
> and seem like master updates and that is OK. 
> The importExport.java test is what I am concernced about.  The diff is

> 
> But when I reran these tests individually, they passed  OK.

Individually within the network frameworks, or as an embedded test?


> 
> Has anyone else come across this ?   I am re-running only the
> derbynetclientmats suite  to see if this test will fail or not.

I'll look into it.

Dan.