You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Joe Calderon <ca...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/06 06:00:38 UTC
old wildcard highlighting behaviour
hello *, currently with hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true, a query for (joe
jack*) will highlight <em>joe jackson</em>, however after reading the
archives, what im looking for is the old 1.1 behaviour so that only
<em>joe jack</em> is highlighted, is this possible in solr 1.5 ?
thx much
--joe
Re: old wildcard highlighting behaviour
Posted by Joe Calderon <ca...@gmail.com>.
when i set hl.highlightMultiTerm=false the term that matches the wild
card is not highlighted at all, ideally ide like a partial highlight
(the characters before the wildcard), but if not i can live without it
thx much for the help
--joe
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On iPhone so don't remember exact param I named it, but check wiki -
> something like hl.highlightMultiTerm - set it to false.
>
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
>
> On Feb 6, 2010, at 12:00 AM, Joe Calderon <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hello *, currently with hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true, a query for (joe
>> jack*) will highlight <em>joe jackson</em>, however after reading the
>> archives, what im looking for is the old 1.1 behaviour so that only
>> <em>joe jack</em> is highlighted, is this possible in solr 1.5 ?
>>
>>
>> thx much
>> --joe
>
Re: old wildcard highlighting behaviour
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
On iPhone so don't remember exact param I named it, but check wiki -
something like hl.highlightMultiTerm - set it to false.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Feb 6, 2010, at 12:00 AM, Joe Calderon <ca...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> hello *, currently with hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true, a query for (joe
> jack*) will highlight <em>joe jackson</em>, however after reading the
> archives, what im looking for is the old 1.1 behaviour so that only
> <em>joe jack</em> is highlighted, is this possible in solr 1.5 ?
>
>
> thx much
> --joe