You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/15 18:16:15 UTC
How can we receive ACK using CXF and WS-RM ?
Hi,
I run an example of CXF using WS-RM spec 1.0 and I try to see the ACK.
Unfortunately, this is not the case.
Is it possible to receive an ACK ?
Could this problem be related to ANONYMOUS TARGET (see text of the log here
after) ?
17:56:49,937 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | RetransmissionQueueImpl |
missionQueueImpl$ResendCandidate 402 | Cannot resend to anonymous target.
Not sch
eduling a resend.
17:56:49,953 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | LoggingOutInterceptor |
ngOutInterceptor$LoggingCallback 170 | Outbound Message
....
--------------------------------------
17:56:51,734 | WARN | r-Timer-15060249 | Proxy |
org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.Proxy 72 | STANDALONE_ANON_ACKS_NOT_SUPPORTED
Kind regards,
Charles
-----
Charles Moulliard
SOA Architect
My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27596956.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: How can we receive ACK using CXF and WS-RM ?
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
Not 100% sure, hopefully soon-ish. It depends on user demand obviously.
BTW gmail seemed to mangle that anonymous URI in my last mail, appending an
"?id=2e7..." parameter for some reason.
Cheers,
Eoghan
On 15 February 2010 18:07, cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thxs,
>
> When is it planned to move to ws-rm 1.1 ?
>
>
>
> Eoghan Glynn-4 wrote:
> >
> > Charles,
> >
> > The CXF WS-RM layer expects the wsrm:AcksTo address to be non-anonymous,
> > i.e. not equal to
> > "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous<
> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous?id=2e7dfecf-f888-45c6-8c21-5a10038ea9bc
> >
> > ".
> >
> > This is in order to allow timely ACKs to be sent in the absence of a
> > steady
> > stream of non-oneway requests (on the responses to which, the pending
> ACKs
> > could be piggy-backed). Because such a regular stream of incoming
> requests
> > is not in general guaranteed, CXF requires that the AcksTo address is not
> > anonymous.
> >
> > We will be able to relax this requirement when we move up to WS-RM 1.1
> > support (as this includes a mechanism for the client-side to probe for
> > pending ACKs).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Eoghan
> >
> > On 15 February 2010 17:16, cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I run an example of CXF using WS-RM spec 1.0 and I try to see the ACK.
> >> Unfortunately, this is not the case.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to receive an ACK ?
> >> Could this problem be related to ANONYMOUS TARGET (see text of the log
> >> here
> >> after) ?
> >>
> >> 17:56:49,937 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | RetransmissionQueueImpl
> >> |
> >> missionQueueImpl$ResendCandidate 402 | Cannot resend to anonymous
> >> target.
> >> Not sch
> >> eduling a resend.
> >> 17:56:49,953 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | LoggingOutInterceptor
> >> |
> >> ngOutInterceptor$LoggingCallback 170 | Outbound Message
> >> ....
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> 17:56:51,734 | WARN | r-Timer-15060249 | Proxy
> >> |
> >> org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.Proxy 72 |
> >> STANDALONE_ANON_ACKS_NOT_SUPPORTED
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Charles
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Charles Moulliard
> >> SOA Architect
> >>
> >> My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> >> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27596956.html
> >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> -----
> Charles Moulliard
> SOA Architect
>
> My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27597653.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: How can we receive ACK using CXF and WS-RM ?
Posted by cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Thxs,
When is it planned to move to ws-rm 1.1 ?
Eoghan Glynn-4 wrote:
>
> Charles,
>
> The CXF WS-RM layer expects the wsrm:AcksTo address to be non-anonymous,
> i.e. not equal to
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous<http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous?id=2e7dfecf-f888-45c6-8c21-5a10038ea9bc>
> ".
>
> This is in order to allow timely ACKs to be sent in the absence of a
> steady
> stream of non-oneway requests (on the responses to which, the pending ACKs
> could be piggy-backed). Because such a regular stream of incoming requests
> is not in general guaranteed, CXF requires that the AcksTo address is not
> anonymous.
>
> We will be able to relax this requirement when we move up to WS-RM 1.1
> support (as this includes a mechanism for the client-side to probe for
> pending ACKs).
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> On 15 February 2010 17:16, cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I run an example of CXF using WS-RM spec 1.0 and I try to see the ACK.
>> Unfortunately, this is not the case.
>>
>> Is it possible to receive an ACK ?
>> Could this problem be related to ANONYMOUS TARGET (see text of the log
>> here
>> after) ?
>>
>> 17:56:49,937 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | RetransmissionQueueImpl
>> |
>> missionQueueImpl$ResendCandidate 402 | Cannot resend to anonymous
>> target.
>> Not sch
>> eduling a resend.
>> 17:56:49,953 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | LoggingOutInterceptor
>> |
>> ngOutInterceptor$LoggingCallback 170 | Outbound Message
>> ....
>> --------------------------------------
>> 17:56:51,734 | WARN | r-Timer-15060249 | Proxy
>> |
>> org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.Proxy 72 |
>> STANDALONE_ANON_ACKS_NOT_SUPPORTED
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Charles
>>
>> -----
>> Charles Moulliard
>> SOA Architect
>>
>> My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27596956.html
>> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
-----
Charles Moulliard
SOA Architect
My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27597653.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: How can we receive ACK using CXF and WS-RM ?
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
Charles,
The CXF WS-RM layer expects the wsrm:AcksTo address to be non-anonymous,
i.e. not equal to
"http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous<http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous?id=2e7dfecf-f888-45c6-8c21-5a10038ea9bc>
".
This is in order to allow timely ACKs to be sent in the absence of a steady
stream of non-oneway requests (on the responses to which, the pending ACKs
could be piggy-backed). Because such a regular stream of incoming requests
is not in general guaranteed, CXF requires that the AcksTo address is not
anonymous.
We will be able to relax this requirement when we move up to WS-RM 1.1
support (as this includes a mechanism for the client-side to probe for
pending ACKs).
Cheers,
Eoghan
On 15 February 2010 17:16, cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I run an example of CXF using WS-RM spec 1.0 and I try to see the ACK.
> Unfortunately, this is not the case.
>
> Is it possible to receive an ACK ?
> Could this problem be related to ANONYMOUS TARGET (see text of the log here
> after) ?
>
> 17:56:49,937 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | RetransmissionQueueImpl
> |
> missionQueueImpl$ResendCandidate 402 | Cannot resend to anonymous target.
> Not sch
> eduling a resend.
> 17:56:49,953 | INFO | 8@qtp-32549725-0 | LoggingOutInterceptor
> |
> ngOutInterceptor$LoggingCallback 170 | Outbound Message
> ....
> --------------------------------------
> 17:56:51,734 | WARN | r-Timer-15060249 | Proxy
> |
> org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.Proxy 72 | STANDALONE_ANON_ACKS_NOT_SUPPORTED
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Charles
>
> -----
> Charles Moulliard
> SOA Architect
>
> My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27596956.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>