You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to muse-dev@ws.apache.org by Andrew Eberbach <ae...@us.ibm.com> on 2006/09/21 16:50:57 UTC
Testing
Hi,
I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so in
standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
started implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and
running I'll update documentation on the site to provide examples and
overall usage so that others can also contribute things like
- junit test cases
- platform targets
and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the build.
We're also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
with that I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code
coverage analysis posted.
Again, any and all input is welcome.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
Re: Testing
Posted by Balan Subramanian <bs...@us.ibm.com>.
miniSOAP is the simple SOAP engine that is packaged with Muse. Muse
supports different SOAP engines through isolation layers - there is one
for Axis2 and one for miniSOAP. The miniSOAP engine was built primarily to
support the Muse on J2ME usecase.
Balan Subramanian
Autonomic Computing, IBM, RTP, NC
919.543.0197 | bsubram@us.ibm.com
"Davanum Srinivas" <da...@gmail.com>
07/21/2007 12:45 AM
Please respond to
muse-dev@ws.apache.org
To
muse-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Testing
What's miniSOAP? Also Felix is the OSGi Container we use. right?
-- dims
On 7/20/07, Kam K. Yee <op...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Andrew/All,
>
> Can you share what the thoughts were on the degree of testing that would
be
> taking place?
>
> As I understand things today, a comprehensive matrix will probably
include
> combinations of the following:
>
> OSes JREs/J2MEs Muse container
> ==== ========== ==============
>
> Windows XP Sun JRE 1.4.2_15 Axis2
1.1 (on Tomcat 5.5.23)
>
> RedHat Linux Sun Java 5.0 Update 12 Axis2 1.1 (on
Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
>
> Any other OSes (?) Sun Java 6.0 Update 2 miniSOAP (on
Tomcat 5.5.23)
>
> IBM 1.4.2 SR 9 miniSOAP (on
Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
>
> IBM Java 5.0 SR 5 OSGi
(version X.Y.Z) with J2SE
>
> IBM Java 6.0 OSGi (version
X.Y.Z) with J2ME
>
> J2ME (version X.Y.Z)
>
> How much of this was envisioned taking place on the Apache-provided
> machines?
>
> If having enough machines to cover all the environment combinations
presents
> to be a restriction, which ones would be consider the priorities?
>
> Regards,
> Kam K. Yee
> IBM Corporation
>
>
>
> Andrew Eberbach wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something
> >> they
> >> can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll
keep
> >> you
> >> posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that
we
> >> can
> >> start writing tests for it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >> Andrew Eberbach
> >> Autonomic Computing
> >> (919) 254-2645
> >> T/L: 444-2645
> >> aeberbac@us.ibm.com
> >>
> >>
> >> > Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM@IBMUS 09/21/2006 02:16 PM
> >> >
> >> > Andrew,
> >> > Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests
run
> >> > during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines
> >> since
> >> > they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle
this? We
> >> > made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in
> >> mind.
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Andrew Eberbach/Durham/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy,
so
> >> in
> >> > > standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll
get
> >> started
> >> > > implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and
> >> running I'll
> >> > > update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall
> >> usage so that
> >> > > others can also contribute things like
> >> > >
> >> > > - junit test cases
> >> > > - platform targets
> >> > >
> >> > > and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the
> >> build. We're
> >> > > also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running
and
> >> with that
> >> > > I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
> >> analysis posted.
> >> > >
> >> > > Again, any and all input is welcome.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Andrew
> >> > >
> >> > > Andrew Eberbach
> >> > > Autonomic Computing
> >> > > (919) 254-2645
> >> > > T/L: 444-2645
> >> > > aeberbac@us.ibm.com
> >> > >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Testing-tf2312453.html#a11715707
> Sent from the Muse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Testing
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
What's miniSOAP? Also Felix is the OSGi Container we use. right?
-- dims
On 7/20/07, Kam K. Yee <op...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Andrew/All,
>
> Can you share what the thoughts were on the degree of testing that would be
> taking place?
>
> As I understand things today, a comprehensive matrix will probably include
> combinations of the following:
>
> OSes JREs/J2MEs Muse container
> ==== ========== ==============
>
> Windows XP Sun JRE 1.4.2_15 Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 5.5.23)
>
> RedHat Linux Sun Java 5.0 Update 12 Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
>
> Any other OSes (?) Sun Java 6.0 Update 2 miniSOAP (on Tomcat 5.5.23)
>
> IBM 1.4.2 SR 9 miniSOAP (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
>
> IBM Java 5.0 SR 5 OSGi (version X.Y.Z) with J2SE
>
> IBM Java 6.0 OSGi (version X.Y.Z) with J2ME
>
> J2ME (version X.Y.Z)
>
> How much of this was envisioned taking place on the Apache-provided
> machines?
>
> If having enough machines to cover all the environment combinations presents
> to be a restriction, which ones would be consider the priorities?
>
> Regards,
> Kam K. Yee
> IBM Corporation
>
>
>
> Andrew Eberbach wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something
> >> they
> >> can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll keep
> >> you
> >> posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that we
> >> can
> >> start writing tests for it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >> Andrew Eberbach
> >> Autonomic Computing
> >> (919) 254-2645
> >> T/L: 444-2645
> >> aeberbac@us.ibm.com
> >>
> >>
> >> > Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM@IBMUS 09/21/2006 02:16 PM
> >> >
> >> > Andrew,
> >> > Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run
> >> > during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines
> >> since
> >> > they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We
> >> > made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in
> >> mind.
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Andrew Eberbach/Durham/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so
> >> in
> >> > > standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
> >> started
> >> > > implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and
> >> running I'll
> >> > > update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall
> >> usage so that
> >> > > others can also contribute things like
> >> > >
> >> > > - junit test cases
> >> > > - platform targets
> >> > >
> >> > > and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the
> >> build. We're
> >> > > also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
> >> with that
> >> > > I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
> >> analysis posted.
> >> > >
> >> > > Again, any and all input is welcome.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Andrew
> >> > >
> >> > > Andrew Eberbach
> >> > > Autonomic Computing
> >> > > (919) 254-2645
> >> > > T/L: 444-2645
> >> > > aeberbac@us.ibm.com
> >> > >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Testing-tf2312453.html#a11715707
> Sent from the Muse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Testing
Posted by "Kam K. Yee" <op...@gmail.com>.
Hey Andrew/All,
Can you share what the thoughts were on the degree of testing that would be
taking place?
As I understand things today, a comprehensive matrix will probably include
combinations of the following:
OSes JREs/J2MEs Muse container
==== ========== ==============
Windows XP Sun JRE 1.4.2_15 Axis2 1.1
(on Tomcat 5.5.23)
RedHat Linux Sun Java 5.0 Update 12 Axis2 1.1 (on
Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
Any other OSes (?) Sun Java 6.0 Update 2 miniSOAP (on
Tomcat 5.5.23)
IBM 1.4.2 SR 9
miniSOAP (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
IBM Java 5.0 SR 5 OSGi
(version X.Y.Z) with J2SE
IBM Java 6.0 OSGi
(version X.Y.Z) with J2ME
J2ME (version X.Y.Z)
How much of this was envisioned taking place on the Apache-provided
machines?
If having enough machines to cover all the environment combinations presents
to be a restriction, which ones would be consider the priorities?
Regards,
Kam K. Yee
IBM Corporation
Andrew Eberbach wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something
>> they
>> can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll keep
>> you
>> posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that we
>> can
>> start writing tests for it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
>>
>> Andrew Eberbach
>> Autonomic Computing
>> (919) 254-2645
>> T/L: 444-2645
>> aeberbac@us.ibm.com
>>
>>
>> > Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM@IBMUS 09/21/2006 02:16 PM
>> >
>> > Andrew,
>> > Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run
>> > during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines
>> since
>> > they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We
>> > made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in
>> mind.
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > > Andrew Eberbach/Durham/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so
>> in
>> > > standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
>> started
>> > > implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and
>> running I'll
>> > > update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall
>> usage so that
>> > > others can also contribute things like
>> > >
>> > > - junit test cases
>> > > - platform targets
>> > >
>> > > and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the
>> build. We're
>> > > also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
>> with that
>> > > I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
>> analysis posted.
>> > >
>> > > Again, any and all input is welcome.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Andrew
>> > >
>> > > Andrew Eberbach
>> > > Autonomic Computing
>> > > (919) 254-2645
>> > > T/L: 444-2645
>> > > aeberbac@us.ibm.com
>> > >
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Testing-tf2312453.html#a11715707
Sent from the Muse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Testing
Posted by "Kam K. Yee" <op...@gmail.com>.
Hey Andrew/All,
Can you share what the thoughts were on the degree of testing that would be
taking place?
As I understand things today, a comprehensive matrix will probably include
combinations of the following:
OSes JREs/J2MEs Muse container
==== ========== ==============
Windows XP Sun JRE 1.4.2_15 Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 5.5.23)
RedHat Linux Sun Java 5.0 Update 12 Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
Any other OSes (?) Sun Java 6.0 Update 2 miniSOAP (on Tomcat 5.5.23)
IBM 1.4.2 SR 9 miniSOAP (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?)
IBM Java 5.0 SR 5 OSGi (version X.Y.Z) with J2SE
IBM Java 6.0 OSGi (version X.Y.Z) with J2ME
J2ME (version X.Y.Z)
How much of this was envisioned taking place on the Apache-provided
machines?
If having enough machines to cover all the environment combinations presents
to be a restriction, which ones would be consider the priorities?
Regards,
Kam K. Yee
IBM Corporation
Andrew Eberbach wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something
>> they
>> can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll keep
>> you
>> posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that we
>> can
>> start writing tests for it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
>>
>> Andrew Eberbach
>> Autonomic Computing
>> (919) 254-2645
>> T/L: 444-2645
>> aeberbac@us.ibm.com
>>
>>
>> > Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM@IBMUS 09/21/2006 02:16 PM
>> >
>> > Andrew,
>> > Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run
>> > during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines
>> since
>> > they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We
>> > made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in
>> mind.
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > > Andrew Eberbach/Durham/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so
>> in
>> > > standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
>> started
>> > > implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and
>> running I'll
>> > > update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall
>> usage so that
>> > > others can also contribute things like
>> > >
>> > > - junit test cases
>> > > - platform targets
>> > >
>> > > and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the
>> build. We're
>> > > also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
>> with that
>> > > I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
>> analysis posted.
>> > >
>> > > Again, any and all input is welcome.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Andrew
>> > >
>> > > Andrew Eberbach
>> > > Autonomic Computing
>> > > (919) 254-2645
>> > > T/L: 444-2645
>> > > aeberbac@us.ibm.com
>> > >
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Testing-tf2312453.html#a11715707
Sent from the Muse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Testing
Posted by Andrew Eberbach <ae...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi,
I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something they
can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll keep you
posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that we can
start writing tests for it.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
09/21/2006 02:16 PM
Please respond to
muse-dev@ws.apache.org
To
muse-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Testing
Andrew,
Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run
during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines since
they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We
made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in mind.
Dan
Andrew Eberbach/Durham/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so in
> standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
started
> implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and running
I'll
> update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall usage
so that
> others can also contribute things like
>
> - junit test cases
> - platform targets
>
> and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the build.
We're
> also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
with that
> I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
analysis posted.
>
> Again, any and all input is welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> Andrew Eberbach
> Autonomic Computing
> (919) 254-2645
> T/L: 444-2645
> aeberbac@us.ibm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Testing
Posted by Daniel Jemiolo <da...@us.ibm.com>.
Andrew,
Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run
during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines since
they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We
made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in mind.
Dan
Andrew Eberbach/Durham/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so in
> standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
started
> implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and running
I'll
> update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall usage
so that
> others can also contribute things like
>
> - junit test cases
> - platform targets
>
> and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the build.
We're
> also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
with that
> I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
analysis posted.
>
> Again, any and all input is welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> Andrew Eberbach
> Autonomic Computing
> (919) 254-2645
> T/L: 444-2645
> aeberbac@us.ibm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org