You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oltu.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2012/07/04 10:29:48 UTC
Amber assemblies distribution
Hi all guys,
while it is clear that here at ASF we release *sources* and that it is
a good practice to redistribute precompiled packages, I would like to
understand - hopefully some of you could help me - which are the
modules/packages we intend to redistribute to users.
I mean, just to take a sample, at Any23 we redistribute a CLI tool -
which contains dependencies - that is the any23 "product" that users
download-extract-launch... do we have something similar at Amber? Or
having Amber in form of Maven-artifacts only already satisfies the
users needs?
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
Re: Amber assemblies distribution
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
excellent - I'll cut out an RC available ASAP to check what needs to be fixed!
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> I tend to agree with Raymond on this one.
>
> On Jul 6, 2012, at 8:39 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi Raymond
>>
>> thanks for your feedbacks! I wouldn't create an assembly for each
>> module we have - maybe the common shared libs could be contained in
>> the "end user" libs...
>>
>> Does anyone has an idea which are most valuable end-user modules?
>
> those module IMHO would be at least (for the moment)
>
> oauth2-client
> oauth2-resourceserver
> oauth2-common
> oauth2-authzserver
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
>>
>> Best and thanks,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> For Amber, it will be probably used as a library of jars at this point since we don't have a fully-fledged oAuth 2.0 server application yet. I suggest that we create a simple binary dist that contains all the jars that Amber produces and depends. Of course, we'll publish the amber jars into maven repo :-).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raymond
>>>
>>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>>
>>>> while it is clear that here at ASF we release *sources* and that it is
>>>> a good practice to redistribute precompiled packages, I would like to
>>>> understand - hopefully some of you could help me - which are the
>>>> modules/packages we intend to redistribute to users.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, just to take a sample, at Any23 we redistribute a CLI tool -
>>>> which contains dependencies - that is the any23 "product" that users
>>>> download-extract-launch... do we have something similar at Amber? Or
>>>> having Amber in form of Maven-artifacts only already satisfies the
>>>> users needs?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>>> -Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>
Re: Amber assemblies distribution
Posted by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>.
Hi Simone,
I tend to agree with Raymond on this one.
On Jul 6, 2012, at 8:39 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Raymond
>
> thanks for your feedbacks! I wouldn't create an assembly for each
> module we have - maybe the common shared libs could be contained in
> the "end user" libs...
>
> Does anyone has an idea which are most valuable end-user modules?
those module IMHO would be at least (for the moment)
oauth2-client
oauth2-resourceserver
oauth2-common
oauth2-authzserver
Regards
Antonio
>
> Best and thanks,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For Amber, it will be probably used as a library of jars at this point since we don't have a fully-fledged oAuth 2.0 server application yet. I suggest that we create a simple binary dist that contains all the jars that Amber produces and depends. Of course, we'll publish the amber jars into maven repo :-).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all guys,
>>>
>>> while it is clear that here at ASF we release *sources* and that it is
>>> a good practice to redistribute precompiled packages, I would like to
>>> understand - hopefully some of you could help me - which are the
>>> modules/packages we intend to redistribute to users.
>>>
>>> I mean, just to take a sample, at Any23 we redistribute a CLI tool -
>>> which contains dependencies - that is the any23 "product" that users
>>> download-extract-launch... do we have something similar at Amber? Or
>>> having Amber in form of Maven-artifacts only already satisfies the
>>> users needs?
>>>
>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>> -Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
Re: Amber assemblies distribution
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi Raymond
thanks for your feedbacks! I wouldn't create an assembly for each
module we have - maybe the common shared libs could be contained in
the "end user" libs...
Does anyone has an idea which are most valuable end-user modules?
Best and thanks,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For Amber, it will be probably used as a library of jars at this point since we don't have a fully-fledged oAuth 2.0 server application yet. I suggest that we create a simple binary dist that contains all the jars that Amber produces and depends. Of course, we'll publish the amber jars into maven repo :-).
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> while it is clear that here at ASF we release *sources* and that it is
>> a good practice to redistribute precompiled packages, I would like to
>> understand - hopefully some of you could help me - which are the
>> modules/packages we intend to redistribute to users.
>>
>> I mean, just to take a sample, at Any23 we redistribute a CLI tool -
>> which contains dependencies - that is the any23 "product" that users
>> download-extract-launch... do we have something similar at Amber? Or
>> having Amber in form of Maven-artifacts only already satisfies the
>> users needs?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>
Re: Amber assemblies distribution
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
For Amber, it will be probably used as a library of jars at this point since we don't have a fully-fledged oAuth 2.0 server application yet. I suggest that we create a simple binary dist that contains all the jars that Amber produces and depends. Of course, we'll publish the amber jars into maven repo :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> while it is clear that here at ASF we release *sources* and that it is
> a good practice to redistribute precompiled packages, I would like to
> understand - hopefully some of you could help me - which are the
> modules/packages we intend to redistribute to users.
>
> I mean, just to take a sample, at Any23 we redistribute a CLI tool -
> which contains dependencies - that is the any23 "product" that users
> download-extract-launch... do we have something similar at Amber? Or
> having Amber in form of Maven-artifacts only already satisfies the
> users needs?
>
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/