You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by "Alok Lal (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/01 19:23:06 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (RANGER-444) Service-def validation: Detect and
flag services with illegal resource hierarchies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Alok Lal reassigned RANGER-444:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Alok Lal
> Service-def validation: Detect and flag services with illegal resource hierarchies
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RANGER-444
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-444
> Project: Ranger
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Alok Lal
> Assignee: Alok Lal
> Fix For: 0.5.0
>
>
> Resource definitions of a service-def is a graph which should be a [tree|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_(data_structure)].
> - Is it legal for resource graph to denote a forest, i.e multiple root nodes, i.e. be a forest? (A forest is a set of n ≥ 0 disjoint trees)
> - Resource allows only for specifying a single parent so this excludes several types of graphs. However, it should still be evaluated to detect cycles, ensure that there is at least one source and one sink, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)