[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-4301) cxfEndpoint serviceClass attribute should accept an interface or an anstract class

["Jean-Baptiste Onofré (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13078668#comment-13078668 ] 

Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on CAMEL-4301:
---------------------------------------------

I just tried and it's already the case. serviceClass could contain an interface with the @WebService annotation.
I check the wiki page of camel-cxf and update it if required.

> cxfEndpoint serviceClass attribute should accept an interface or an anstract class
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-4301
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4301
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-cxf
>            Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>
> If you define a route looking like:
>     <cxf:cxfEndpoint id="wsBean"
>                      serviceClass="net.nanthrax.test.camel.cxf.WSBean"
>                      address="http://0.0.0.0:9090/test"/>
>     <camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring">
>         <route>
>             <from uri="cxf:bean:wsBean"/>
>             <to uri="direct:bean"/>
>         </route>
>         <route>
>             <from uri="direct:bean"/>
>             <to uri="serviceBean"/>
>         </route>
>     </camelContext>
> the methods of the CXF endpoint wsBean are just facade (the route doesn't use the implementation of the wsBean method, and map the method definition to the serviceBean target bean).
> It could be confusing for the users: they have to define methods body but it's not used :)
> It could be fine to use directly an interface or an abstract class in serviceClass.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira