You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> on 2020/04/01 02:47:02 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Hi Stephan,
Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could help
in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]? I
skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
though. Thanks.
btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
Best Regards,
Yu
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
>
> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>
> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal issue.
> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for all
> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
>
> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
> All issues are fixed in this PR:
> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
> >
> > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
> blocker.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
> >>
> >>
> >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as we
> >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
> >> > modules.
> >> >
> >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source at
> >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> >> >
> >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up in
> >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing before
> >> > opening another RC.
> >> >
> >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation, hence,
> -1.
> >> >
> >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> >> >>
> >> >> Checked:
> >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected files,
> >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> >> >>
> >>
> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
> >> >> Kafka.
> >> >> The file states
> >> >>
> >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
> >> available
> >> >>> under the CDDL
> >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
> >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
> >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing in
> >> >> that
> >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
> >> >> this is
> >> >> not the right file,
> >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be at
> >> >> risk of
> >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
> >> >> this RC
> >> >> gets cancelled again).
> >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> >> >>
> >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which is
> >> MIT
> >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the license
> >> with
> >> >> each copy of the source.
> >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
> >> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
> >>
> >> >> but
> >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
> this
> >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release generation?!)
> >> >>
> >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
> >> >> file in
> >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
> >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for the
> >> >>> Maven
> >> >>> artifacts:
> >> >>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original repo
> >> >>> posted
> >> >>> in this thread (
> >> >>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> )
> >> >>>
> >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
> >> removed
> >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use our
> own
> >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> >> >>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> ).
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the staged
> >> >>> Maven
> >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
> >> >>> distribution,
> >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end time.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will
> >> have
> >> >>> the
> >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
> rmetzger@apache.org>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
> >> >>>>> staging
> >> >>>>> repository.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the parent
> >> >>>>>> POM,
> >> >>>>> and
> >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
> jars.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
> >> itself
> >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
> >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use our
> own
> >> >>>>> tooling
> >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the source
> >> >>> tarballs
> >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
> >> >>>>>> found.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely fine
> to
> >> >>> keep
> >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
> touched,
> >> >>> only
> >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
> packaged
> >> >>> for
> >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
> >> parent
> >> >>>>>> module
> >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> >> rmetzger@apache.org
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven
> >> >>> staging
> >> >>>>>>>> repo:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in docs/
> >> >>>>>>>> from
> >> >>>>>> jekyll
> >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> >> >>>>> I
> >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
> release
> >> >>> to
> >> >>>>>> maven
> >> >>>>>>>> central?
> >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
> >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents are
> >> >>> sane
> >> >>>>> (no
> >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
> >> bundled
> >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
> fastutil
> >> >>> (
> >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts looks
> >> >>> good.
> >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
> >> >>> (copied
> >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
> >> >>> LICENSE
> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles / doc
> >> >>>>> configs
> >> >>>>>>>> point
> >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled (mvn
> >> >>>>> clean
> >> >>>>>>>> verify
> >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct POM
> /
> >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
> Greeter
> >> >>> /
> >> >>>>>>>> Python
> >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
> >> >>> remote
> >> >>>>>>>> Python
> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway, Java
> >> >>>>> embedded
> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to include
> >> >>>>> this
> >> >>>>>>>>> release.
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
> the
> >> >>>>>>>> version
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >> >>>>>>>> comments)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> >> >>> collaborating
> >> >>>>>>>> testing
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> >> >>> guideline
> >> >>>>> in
> >> >>>>>>>> what
> >> >>>>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply put
> >> >>>>> your
> >> >>>>>>>> name
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to be
> >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> >> >>> deployed
> >> >>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> >> >>>>> Repository
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned artifacts
> >> >>>>> are as
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> >> >>>>> corresponding
> >> >>>>>> dev
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> >> >>>>>> Repository
> >> >>>>>>>> [3]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
> >> >>>>> Stateful
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> >> >>> creation
> >> >>>>> of
> >> >>>>>>>> those
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars already
> >> >>>>>> deployed
> >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts are
> >> >>>>>>>> officially
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing about
> >> >>>>> where
> >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked on
> >> >>> (by
> >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
> >> >>>>>>>>> as
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> >> >>> Functions
> >> >>>>>>>>> project.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
> >> >>> this
> >> >>>>>> vote
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
> >> >>>>> already.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
> on,
> >> >>>>> you
> >> >>>>>>>> will
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from there.
> >> >>>>> Here
> >> >>>>>>>> are
> >> >>>>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
> RCs,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting Monday
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >> >>>>>> affirmative
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >> >>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> >> >>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> >> >>>>>>>>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> >> >>>>>
> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> >> >>> contents:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> staged
> >> >>>>>>>> release
> >> >>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
> Apache
> >> >>>>> Flink
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
> Tung
> >> >>>>>> Jason,
> >> >>>>>>>> Ji
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
+1 to include the changes (modulo the PR comments) and create a new RC.
Best,
Stephan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:55 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tz...@apache.org>
wrote:
> All issues FLINK-16891 to FLINK-16897 have been resolved, with Stephan's
> PR, including the hard blocker on the missing jquery license.
>
> I have some final licensing touches as well here (non of which are blockers
> to the release, but nonetheless nice to fix if we're going have a new RC):
> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/88
> which addresses the following:
> - FLINK-16900 (this addresses Roberts discovery on the Kafka NOTICE /
> LICENSE files): Exclude NOTICE and LICENSE files of Kafka dependencies
> - FLINK-16901: Flink Kinesis connector NOTICE should have contents of AWS
> KPL’s THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES file manually merged in
> - FLINK-16902: Duplicate LICENSE.txt pulled in should be excluded using
> ApacheLicenseResourceTransformer
>
> I'll open a new RC once we decide whether or not to include the above fixes
> as well.
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephan,
> >
> > Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
> help
> > in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]? I
> > skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
> > do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
> > though. Thanks.
> >
> > btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
> > but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new
> RC.
> > >
> > > The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
> > >
> > > Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
> > > bundles many unwanted dependencies.
> > > - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
> > issue.
> > > - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
> > all
> > > "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
> > > But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily
> large.
> > >
> > > I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
> > > All issues are fixed in this PR:
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
> > > >
> > > > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
> > > blocker.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> > > >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > > >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
> > we
> > > >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the
> flink-sql-connector-kafka
> > > >> > modules.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
> at
> > > >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
> in
> > > >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
> > before
> > > >> > opening another RC.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
> hence,
> > > -1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > > >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Checked:
> > > >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
> > files,
> > > >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> > > >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
> > > >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from
> Apache
> > > >> >> Kafka.
> > > >> >> The file states
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
> > > >> available
> > > >> >>> under the CDDL
> > > >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> > > >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> > > >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located
> in
> > > >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
> > > >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be
> confusing
> > in
> > > >> >> that
> > > >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue
> that
> > > >> >> this is
> > > >> >> not the right file,
> > > >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
> at
> > > >> >> risk of
> > > >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> > > >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> > > >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or
> if
> > > >> >> this RC
> > > >> >> gets cancelled again).
> > > >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
> > is
> > > >> MIT
> > > >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
> license
> > > >> with
> > > >> >> each copy of the source.
> > > >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
> > > >> >>
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js
> ,
> > > >>
> > > >> >> but
> > > >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even
> though
> > > this
> > > >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
> generation?!)
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing
> license
> > > >> >> file in
> > > >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I
> have
> > > >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> > > >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
> > > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
> the
> > > >> >>> Maven
> > > >> >>> artifacts:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
> > repo
> > > >> >>> posted
> > > >> >>> in this thread (
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > > )
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
> > > >> removed
> > > >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> > > >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
> our
> > > own
> > > >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> > > ).
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
> staged
> > > >> >>> Maven
> > > >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the
> source
> > > >> >>> distribution,
> > > >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
> > time.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> > > >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
> will
> > > >> have
> > > >> >>> the
> > > >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
> > > >> >>>>> staging
> > > >> >>>>> repository.
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
> > parent
> > > >> >>>>>> POM,
> > > >> >>>>> and
> > > >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
> > > jars.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
> > > >> itself
> > > >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to
> Maven.
> > > >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
> our
> > > own
> > > >> >>>>> tooling
> > > >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
> source
> > > >> >>> tarballs
> > > >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files
> Robert
> > > >> >>>>>> found.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
> fine
> > > to
> > > >> >>> keep
> > > >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
> > > touched,
> > > >> >>> only
> > > >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
> > > packaged
> > > >> >>> for
> > > >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
> > > >> parent
> > > >> >>>>>> module
> > > >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> > > >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > >> rmetzger@apache.org
> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> > > >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
> maven
> > > >> >>> staging
> > > >> >>>>>>>> repo:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
> > docs/
> > > >> >>>>>>>> from
> > > >> >>>>>> jekyll
> > > >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> > > >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> > > >> >>>>> I
> > > >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
> > > release
> > > >> >>> to
> > > >> >>>>>> maven
> > > >> >>>>>>>> central?
> > > >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
> > > >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release
> files
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
> > are
> > > >> >>> sane
> > > >> >>>>> (no
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
> > > >> bundled
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
> > > fastutil
> > > >> >>> (
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
> > looks
> > > >> >>> good.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> > > >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator,
> statefun-flink-core
> > > >> >>> (copied
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain
> ASLv2
> > > >> >>> LICENSE
> > > >> >>>>>> and
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
> > doc
> > > >> >>>>> configs
> > > >> >>>>>>>> point
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
> > (mvn
> > > >> >>>>> clean
> > > >> >>>>>>>> verify
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
> > POM
> > > /
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
> > > Greeter
> > > >> >>> /
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Python
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS
> ecosystem:
> > > >> >>> remote
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Python
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
> Java
> > > >> >>>>> embedded
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
> > include
> > > >> >>>>> this
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> release.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4*
> for
> > > the
> > > >> >>>>>>>> version
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > specific
> > > >> >>>>>>>> comments)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> > > >> >>> collaborating
> > > >> >>>>>>>> testing
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> > > >> >>> guideline
> > > >> >>>>> in
> > > >> >>>>>>>> what
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
> > put
> > > >> >>>>> your
> > > >> >>>>>>>> name
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
> > be
> > > >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> > > >> >>> deployed
> > > >> >>>>> to
> > > >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > >> >>>>> Repository
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
> > artifacts
> > > >> >>>>> are as
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> > > >> >>>>> corresponding
> > > >> >>>>>> dev
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> > > >> >>>>>> Repository
> > > >> >>>>>>>> [3]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images
> for
> > > >> >>>>> Stateful
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> > > >> >>> creation
> > > >> >>>>> of
> > > >> >>>>>>>> those
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
> already
> > > >> >>>>>> deployed
> > > >> >>>>>>>> to
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
> > are
> > > >> >>>>>>>> officially
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
> > about
> > > >> >>>>> where
> > > >> >>>>>>>> to
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
> on
> > > >> >>> (by
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> as
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> > > >> >>> Functions
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> project.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards
> in
> > > >> >>> this
> > > >> >>>>>> vote
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your
> votes
> > > >> >>>>> already.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being
> worked
> > > on,
> > > >> >>>>> you
> > > >> >>>>>>>> will
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
> > there.
> > > >> >>>>> Here
> > > >> >>>>>>>> are
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> the
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
> > > RCs,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
> > Monday
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > >> >>>>>> affirmative
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> > > >> >>> contents:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via
> `--settings
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> > > staged
> > > >> >>>>>>>> release
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> and
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> > > >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
> > > Apache
> > > >> >>>>> Flink
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
> > Germany
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
> > > Tung
> > > >> >>>>>> Jason,
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Ji
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
[VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by Igal Shilman <ig...@ververica.com>.
Thanks Gordon and everyone else for addressing the various licensing issues!
+1 to include these fixies and create a new RC.
Thanks,
Igal.
On Wednesday, April 1, 2020, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tz...@apache.org>
wrote:
> @Yu Li
> I fixed the tagged JIRA versions while closing the issues.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:54 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All issues FLINK-16891 to FLINK-16897 have been resolved, with Stephan's
> > PR, including the hard blocker on the missing jquery license.
> >
> > I have some final licensing touches as well here (non of which are
> > blockers to the release, but nonetheless nice to fix if we're going have
> a
> > new RC):
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/88
> > which addresses the following:
> > - FLINK-16900 (this addresses Roberts discovery on the Kafka NOTICE /
> > LICENSE files): Exclude NOTICE and LICENSE files of Kafka dependencies
> > - FLINK-16901: Flink Kinesis connector NOTICE should have contents of AWS
> > KPL’s THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES file manually merged in
> > - FLINK-16902: Duplicate LICENSE.txt pulled in should be excluded using
> > ApacheLicenseResourceTransformer
> >
> > I'll open a new RC once we decide whether or not to include the above
> > fixes as well.
> > Please let me know what you think.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stephan,
> >>
> >> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
> >> help
> >> in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]? I
> >> skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way
> to
> >> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
> >> though. Thanks.
> >>
> >> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
> >> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
> >>
> >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new
> RC.
> >> >
> >> > The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
> >> >
> >> > Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
> >> > bundles many unwanted dependencies.
> >> > - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
> >> issue.
> >> > - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
> >> all
> >> > "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
> >> > But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily
> large.
> >> >
> >> > I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
> >> > All issues are fixed in this PR:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
> >> > >
> >> > > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
> >> > blocker.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <
> chesnay@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> >> > >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> >> > >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far
> as
> >> we
> >> > >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the
> flink-sql-connector-kafka
> >> > >> > modules.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
> >> at
> >> > >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
> >> in
> >> > >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
> >> before
> >> > >> > opening another RC.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
> >> hence,
> >> > -1.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >> > >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Checked:
> >> > >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
> >> files,
> >> > >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> >> > >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun
> -flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from
> Apache
> >> > >> >> Kafka.
> >> > >> >> The file states
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
> >> > >> available
> >> > >> >>> under the CDDL
> >> > >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> >> > >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> >> > >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located
> in
> >> > >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
> >> > >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be
> >> confusing in
> >> > >> >> that
> >> > >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue
> that
> >> > >> >> this is
> >> > >> >> not the right file,
> >> > >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
> >> at
> >> > >> >> risk of
> >> > >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> >> > >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> >> > >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or
> if
> >> > >> >> this RC
> >> > >> >> gets cancelled again).
> >> > >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js",
> which
> >> is
> >> > >> MIT
> >> > >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
> >> license
> >> > >> with
> >> > >> >> each copy of the source.
> >> > >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/
> jquery.min.js,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> but
> >> > >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even
> though
> >> > this
> >> > >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
> >> generation?!)
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing
> license
> >> > >> >> file in
> >> > >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I
> have
> >> > >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> > >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
> >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
> >> the
> >> > >> >>> Maven
> >> > >> >>> artifacts:
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
> >> repo
> >> > >> >>> posted
> >> > >> >>> in this thread (
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> > )
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
> >> > >> removed
> >> > >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> >> > >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
> >> our
> >> > own
> >> > >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >> > ).
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
> >> staged
> >> > >> >>> Maven
> >> > >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the
> source
> >> > >> >>> distribution,
> >> > >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
> >> time.
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> > >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
> >> will
> >> > >> have
> >> > >> >>> the
> >> > >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
> >> > rmetzger@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new
> maven
> >> > >> >>>>> staging
> >> > >> >>>>> repository.
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> > >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
> >> parent
> >> > >> >>>>>> POM,
> >> > >> >>>>> and
> >> > >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
> >> > jars.
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build
> profile
> >> > >> itself
> >> > >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to
> Maven.
> >> > >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
> >> our
> >> > own
> >> > >> >>>>> tooling
> >> > >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
> >> source
> >> > >> >>> tarballs
> >> > >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files
> Robert
> >> > >> >>>>>> found.
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
> >> fine
> >> > to
> >> > >> >>> keep
> >> > >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
> >> > touched,
> >> > >> >>> only
> >> > >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> > >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
> >> > packaged
> >> > >> >>> for
> >> > >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's
> the
> >> > >> parent
> >> > >> >>>>>> module
> >> > >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> >> > >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> >> > >> rmetzger@apache.org
> >> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
> >> maven
> >> > >> >>> staging
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> repo:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> flink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
> >> docs/
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> from
> >> > >> >>>>>> jekyll
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> >> > >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> >> > >> >>>>> I
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
> >> > release
> >> > >> >>> to
> >> > >> >>>>>> maven
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> central?
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
> >> > >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> > >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release
> files
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
> >> are
> >> > >> >>> sane
> >> > >> >>>>> (no
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
> >> > >> bundled
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
> >> > fastutil
> >> > >> >>> (
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
> >> looks
> >> > >> >>> good.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> >> > >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator,
> statefun-flink-core
> >> > >> >>> (copied
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain
> ASLv2
> >> > >> >>> LICENSE
> >> > >> >>>>>> and
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
> >> doc
> >> > >> >>>>> configs
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> point
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
> >> (mvn
> >> > >> >>>>> clean
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> verify
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
> >> POM
> >> > /
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
> >> > Greeter
> >> > >> >>> /
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Python
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS
> ecosystem:
> >> > >> >>> remote
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Python
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
> >> Java
> >> > >> >>>>> embedded
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
> >> include
> >> > >> >>>>> this
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> release.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local
> builds...check
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4*
> for
> >> > the
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> version
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> >> specific
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> comments)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> >> > >> >>> collaborating
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> testing
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> >> > >> >>> guideline
> >> > >> >>>>> in
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> what
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> to
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task,
> simply
> >> put
> >> > >> >>>>> your
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> name
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution,
> to
> >> be
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> >> > >> >>> deployed
> >> > >> >>>>> to
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> >> > >> >>>>> Repository
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
> >> artifacts
> >> > >> >>>>> are as
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> >> > >> >>>>> corresponding
> >> > >> >>>>>> dev
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache
> Nexus
> >> > >> >>>>>> Repository
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> [3]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images
> for
> >> > >> >>>>> Stateful
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> >> > >> >>> creation
> >> > >> >>>>> of
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> those
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
> >> already
> >> > >> >>>>>> deployed
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these
> artifacts
> >> are
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> officially
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
> >> about
> >> > >> >>>>> where
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
> >> on
> >> > >> >>> (by
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> as
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> >> > >> >>> Functions
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> project.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards
> in
> >> > >> >>> this
> >> > >> >>>>>> vote
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your
> votes
> >> > >> >>>>> already.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being
> worked
> >> > on,
> >> > >> >>>>> you
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> will
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
> >> there.
> >> > >> >>>>> Here
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> are
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> the
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from
> previous
> >> > RCs,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
> >> Monday
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3
> PMC
> >> > >> >>>>>> affirmative
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQ
> bzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12315522&version=12346878
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=
> commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.
> com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Function
> s-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> >> > >> >>> contents:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via
> `--settings
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> >> > staged
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> release
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> and
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> >> > >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
> >> > Apache
> >> > >> >>>>> Flink
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
> >> Germany
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip
> Park
> >> > Tung
> >> > >> >>>>>> Jason,
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Ji
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by "Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai" <tz...@apache.org>.
@Yu Li
I fixed the tagged JIRA versions while closing the issues.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:54 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tz...@apache.org>
wrote:
> All issues FLINK-16891 to FLINK-16897 have been resolved, with Stephan's
> PR, including the hard blocker on the missing jquery license.
>
> I have some final licensing touches as well here (non of which are
> blockers to the release, but nonetheless nice to fix if we're going have a
> new RC):
> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/88
> which addresses the following:
> - FLINK-16900 (this addresses Roberts discovery on the Kafka NOTICE /
> LICENSE files): Exclude NOTICE and LICENSE files of Kafka dependencies
> - FLINK-16901: Flink Kinesis connector NOTICE should have contents of AWS
> KPL’s THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES file manually merged in
> - FLINK-16902: Duplicate LICENSE.txt pulled in should be excluded using
> ApacheLicenseResourceTransformer
>
> I'll open a new RC once we decide whether or not to include the above
> fixes as well.
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephan,
>>
>> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
>> help
>> in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]? I
>> skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
>> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
>> though. Thanks.
>>
>> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
>> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
>> >
>> > The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>> >
>> > Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>> > bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>> > - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>> issue.
>> > - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
>> all
>> > "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>> > But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
>> >
>> > I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>> > All issues are fixed in this PR:
>> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>> > >
>> > > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>> > blocker.
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>> > >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> > >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
>> we
>> > >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
>> > >> > modules.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
>> at
>> > >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
>> in
>> > >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>> before
>> > >> > opening another RC.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
>> hence,
>> > -1.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> > >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Checked:
>> > >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>> files,
>> > >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>> > >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>> > >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
>> > >> >> Kafka.
>> > >> >> The file states
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>> > >> available
>> > >> >>> under the CDDL
>> > >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>> > >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>> > >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
>> > >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
>> > >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be
>> confusing in
>> > >> >> that
>> > >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
>> > >> >> this is
>> > >> >> not the right file,
>> > >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
>> at
>> > >> >> risk of
>> > >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>> > >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>> > >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
>> > >> >> this RC
>> > >> >> gets cancelled again).
>> > >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
>> is
>> > >> MIT
>> > >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
>> license
>> > >> with
>> > >> >> each copy of the source.
>> > >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
>> > >> >>
>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
>> > >>
>> > >> >> but
>> > >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
>> > this
>> > >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
>> generation?!)
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
>> > >> >> file in
>> > >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
>> > >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> > >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
>> the
>> > >> >>> Maven
>> > >> >>> artifacts:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
>> repo
>> > >> >>> posted
>> > >> >>> in this thread (
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> > )
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>> > >> removed
>> > >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>> > >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
>> our
>> > own
>> > >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> > ).
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
>> staged
>> > >> >>> Maven
>> > >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
>> > >> >>> distribution,
>> > >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
>> time.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> > >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
>> will
>> > >> have
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>> > rmetzger@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>> > >> >>>>> staging
>> > >> >>>>> repository.
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
>> parent
>> > >> >>>>>> POM,
>> > >> >>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>> > jars.
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>> > >> itself
>> > >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
>> > >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
>> our
>> > own
>> > >> >>>>> tooling
>> > >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
>> source
>> > >> >>> tarballs
>> > >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
>> > >> >>>>>> found.
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
>> fine
>> > to
>> > >> >>> keep
>> > >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>> > touched,
>> > >> >>> only
>> > >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>> > packaged
>> > >> >>> for
>> > >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>> > >> parent
>> > >> >>>>>> module
>> > >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>> > >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>> > >> rmetzger@apache.org
>> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>> > >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
>> maven
>> > >> >>> staging
>> > >> >>>>>>>> repo:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
>> docs/
>> > >> >>>>>>>> from
>> > >> >>>>>> jekyll
>> > >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>> > >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>> > >> >>>>> I
>> > >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>> > release
>> > >> >>> to
>> > >> >>>>>> maven
>> > >> >>>>>>>> central?
>> > >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>> > >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
>> are
>> > >> >>> sane
>> > >> >>>>> (no
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>> > >> bundled
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>> > fastutil
>> > >> >>> (
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
>> looks
>> > >> >>> good.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>> > >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
>> > >> >>> (copied
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
>> > >> >>> LICENSE
>> > >> >>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
>> doc
>> > >> >>>>> configs
>> > >> >>>>>>>> point
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>> (mvn
>> > >> >>>>> clean
>> > >> >>>>>>>> verify
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>> POM
>> > /
>> > >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>> > Greeter
>> > >> >>> /
>> > >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
>> > >> >>> remote
>> > >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
>> Java
>> > >> >>>>> embedded
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>> include
>> > >> >>>>> this
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
>> > the
>> > >> >>>>>>>> version
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> specific
>> > >> >>>>>>>> comments)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>> > >> >>> collaborating
>> > >> >>>>>>>> testing
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>> > >> >>> guideline
>> > >> >>>>> in
>> > >> >>>>>>>> what
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>> put
>> > >> >>>>> your
>> > >> >>>>>>>> name
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
>> be
>> > >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>> > >> >>> deployed
>> > >> >>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> > >> >>>>> Repository
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
>> artifacts
>> > >> >>>>> are as
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>> > >> >>>>> corresponding
>> > >> >>>>>> dev
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>> > >> >>>>>> Repository
>> > >> >>>>>>>> [3]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
>> > >> >>>>> Stateful
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>> > >> >>> creation
>> > >> >>>>> of
>> > >> >>>>>>>> those
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
>> already
>> > >> >>>>>> deployed
>> > >> >>>>>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>> are
>> > >> >>>>>>>> officially
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>> about
>> > >> >>>>> where
>> > >> >>>>>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
>> on
>> > >> >>> (by
>> > >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> as
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>> > >> >>> Functions
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> project.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
>> > >> >>> this
>> > >> >>>>>> vote
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
>> > >> >>>>> already.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
>> > on,
>> > >> >>>>> you
>> > >> >>>>>>>> will
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>> there.
>> > >> >>>>> Here
>> > >> >>>>>>>> are
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>> > RCs,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>> Monday
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> > >> >>>>>> affirmative
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>> > >> >>> contents:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>> > staged
>> > >> >>>>>>>> release
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>> > >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>> > Apache
>> > >> >>>>> Flink
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>> Germany
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>> > Tung
>> > >> >>>>>> Jason,
>> > >> >>>>>>>> Ji
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by "Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai" <tz...@apache.org>.
All issues FLINK-16891 to FLINK-16897 have been resolved, with Stephan's
PR, including the hard blocker on the missing jquery license.
I have some final licensing touches as well here (non of which are blockers
to the release, but nonetheless nice to fix if we're going have a new RC):
https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/88
which addresses the following:
- FLINK-16900 (this addresses Roberts discovery on the Kafka NOTICE /
LICENSE files): Exclude NOTICE and LICENSE files of Kafka dependencies
- FLINK-16901: Flink Kinesis connector NOTICE should have contents of AWS
KPL’s THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES file manually merged in
- FLINK-16902: Duplicate LICENSE.txt pulled in should be excluded using
ApacheLicenseResourceTransformer
I'll open a new RC once we decide whether or not to include the above fixes
as well.
Please let me know what you think.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could help
> in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]? I
> skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
> though. Thanks.
>
> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
> >
> > The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
> >
> > Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
> > bundles many unwanted dependencies.
> > - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
> issue.
> > - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
> all
> > "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
> > But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
> >
> > I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
> > All issues are fixed in this PR:
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
> > >
> > > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
> > blocker.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> > >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
> we
> > >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
> > >> > modules.
> > >> >
> > >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source at
> > >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up in
> > >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
> before
> > >> > opening another RC.
> > >> >
> > >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation, hence,
> > -1.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Checked:
> > >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
> files,
> > >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> > >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
> > >> >> Kafka.
> > >> >> The file states
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
> > >> available
> > >> >>> under the CDDL
> > >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> > >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> > >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
> > >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
> > >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing
> in
> > >> >> that
> > >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
> > >> >> this is
> > >> >> not the right file,
> > >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be at
> > >> >> risk of
> > >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> > >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> > >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
> > >> >> this RC
> > >> >> gets cancelled again).
> > >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
> is
> > >> MIT
> > >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the license
> > >> with
> > >> >> each copy of the source.
> > >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
> > >> >>
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
> > >>
> > >> >> but
> > >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
> > this
> > >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release generation?!)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
> > >> >> file in
> > >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
> > >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> > >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for the
> > >> >>> Maven
> > >> >>> artifacts:
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
> repo
> > >> >>> posted
> > >> >>> in this thread (
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > )
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
> > >> removed
> > >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> > >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use our
> > own
> > >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> > ).
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the staged
> > >> >>> Maven
> > >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
> > >> >>> distribution,
> > >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
> time.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> > >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will
> > >> have
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
> > rmetzger@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
> > >> >>>>> staging
> > >> >>>>> repository.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
> parent
> > >> >>>>>> POM,
> > >> >>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
> > jars.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
> > >> itself
> > >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
> > >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use our
> > own
> > >> >>>>> tooling
> > >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the source
> > >> >>> tarballs
> > >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
> > >> >>>>>> found.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely fine
> > to
> > >> >>> keep
> > >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
> > touched,
> > >> >>> only
> > >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
> > packaged
> > >> >>> for
> > >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
> > >> parent
> > >> >>>>>> module
> > >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> > >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> > >> rmetzger@apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> > >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven
> > >> >>> staging
> > >> >>>>>>>> repo:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
> docs/
> > >> >>>>>>>> from
> > >> >>>>>> jekyll
> > >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> > >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> > >> >>>>> I
> > >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
> > release
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>>>>> maven
> > >> >>>>>>>> central?
> > >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
> > >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
> are
> > >> >>> sane
> > >> >>>>> (no
> > >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
> > >> bundled
> > >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
> > fastutil
> > >> >>> (
> > >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
> looks
> > >> >>> good.
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> > >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> > >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
> > >> >>> (copied
> > >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
> > >> >>> LICENSE
> > >> >>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
> doc
> > >> >>>>> configs
> > >> >>>>>>>> point
> > >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
> (mvn
> > >> >>>>> clean
> > >> >>>>>>>> verify
> > >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
> POM
> > /
> > >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> > >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
> > Greeter
> > >> >>> /
> > >> >>>>>>>> Python
> > >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> > >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
> > >> >>> remote
> > >> >>>>>>>> Python
> > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway, Java
> > >> >>>>> embedded
> > >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
> include
> > >> >>>>> this
> > >> >>>>>>>>> release.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> > >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
> > the
> > >> >>>>>>>> version
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific
> > >> >>>>>>>> comments)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> > >> >>> collaborating
> > >> >>>>>>>> testing
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> > >> >>> guideline
> > >> >>>>> in
> > >> >>>>>>>> what
> > >> >>>>>>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
> put
> > >> >>>>> your
> > >> >>>>>>>> name
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
> be
> > >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> > >> >>> deployed
> > >> >>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > >> >>>>> Repository
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
> artifacts
> > >> >>>>> are as
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> > >> >>>>> corresponding
> > >> >>>>>> dev
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> > >> >>>>>> Repository
> > >> >>>>>>>> [3]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
> > >> >>>>> Stateful
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> > >> >>> creation
> > >> >>>>> of
> > >> >>>>>>>> those
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars already
> > >> >>>>>> deployed
> > >> >>>>>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
> are
> > >> >>>>>>>> officially
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
> about
> > >> >>>>> where
> > >> >>>>>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked on
> > >> >>> (by
> > >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> as
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> > >> >>> Functions
> > >> >>>>>>>>> project.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
> > >> >>> this
> > >> >>>>>> vote
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
> > >> >>>>> already.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
> > on,
> > >> >>>>> you
> > >> >>>>>>>> will
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
> there.
> > >> >>>>> Here
> > >> >>>>>>>> are
> > >> >>>>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
> > RCs,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
> Monday
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > >> >>>>>> affirmative
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >> >>>>>
> > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> > >> >>> contents:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> > staged
> > >> >>>>>>>> release
> > >> >>>>>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> > >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
> > Apache
> > >> >>>>> Flink
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
> Germany
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
> > Tung
> > >> >>>>>> Jason,
> > >> >>>>>>>> Ji
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
[DISCUSS] Updates to our Licensing wiki (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink
Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #4)
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Robert, I think these supplements are quite instructive and make the
whole process more clear.
nit: it surprised me a little bit that this voting thread of a canceled RC
is revived so I edited the subject in this reply.
Best Regards,
Yu
On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 22:48, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think I conceptually added everything Stephan mentioned into the Wiki:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=97552147&selectedPageVersions=5&selectedPageVersions=3
> I'm looking forward to any comments or corrections.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:20 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Let's add this information to the licensing wiki page.
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/2020 12:16, Yu Li wrote:
>> > Thanks Stephan, this is enlightening!
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yu
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share
>> >> what I did there.
>> >>
>> >> Source distribution:
>> >> - This means code copied into the repo.
>> >> - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code
>> verbatim
>> >> usually comment on that directly.
>> >> - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
>> >> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files,
>> etc.
>> >> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too
>> many).
>> >>
>> >> Binary distribution:
>> >> - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
>> >> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
>> >> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
>> >> - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important,
>> because
>> >> they bundle dependencies, which means
>> >> (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
>> >> (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> |
>> >> grep ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile /
>> >> provided is not straightforward in maven.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Stephan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Stephan,
>> >>>
>> >>> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
>> >>> help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our
>> wiki [1]?
>> >>> I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good
>> way to
>> >>> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such
>> question
>> >>> though. Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to
>> 2.0.0
>> >>> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>> >>>
>> >>> Best Regards,
>> >>> Yu
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new
>> RC.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>> >>>> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>> >>>> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>> >>>> issue.
>> >>>> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first"
>> for
>> >>>> all
>> >>>> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>> >>>> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily
>> large.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>> >>>> All issues are fixed in this PR:
>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>> >>>> blocker.
>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <
>> chesnay@apache.org>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>> >>>>>> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> >>>>>>> For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
>> >>>> we
>> >>>>>>> can tell it is misleading anyway, see the
>> flink-sql-connector-kafka
>> >>>>>>> modules.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
>> at
>> >>>>>>> licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
>> in
>> >>>>>>> these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>> >>>> before
>> >>>>>>> opening another RC.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
>> >>>> hence, -1.
>> >>>>>>> On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Checked:
>> >>>>>>>> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>> >>>> files,
>> >>>>>>>> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>> >>>>>>>> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>> >>>>>>>> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from
>> Apache
>> >>>>>>>> Kafka.
>> >>>>>>>> The file states
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>> >>>>>> available
>> >>>>>>>>> under the CDDL
>> >>>>>>>>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>> >>>>>>>> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located
>> in
>> >>>>>>>> META-INF/NOTICE).
>> >>>>>>>> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be
>> confusing
>> >>>> in
>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue
>> that
>> >>>>>>>> this is
>> >>>>>>>> not the right file,
>> >>>>>>>> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
>> at
>> >>>>>>>> risk of
>> >>>>>>>> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>> >>>>>>>> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>> >>>>>>>> information, but we should address this in the next release (or
>> if
>> >>>>>>>> this RC
>> >>>>>>>> gets cancelled again).
>> >>>>>>>> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
>> >>>> is
>> >>>>>> MIT
>> >>>>>>>> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
>> license
>> >>>>>> with
>> >>>>>>>> each copy of the source.
>> >>>>>>>> apache/flink also has this file:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
>> >>>>>>>> but
>> >>>>>>>> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even
>> though
>> >>>> this
>> >>>>>>>> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
>> generation?!)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing
>> license
>> >>>>>>>> file in
>> >>>>>>>> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I
>> have
>> >>>>>>>> overlooked something and we can continue.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >>>>>>>> <tz...@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ======= NOTICE =======
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> Maven
>> >>>>>>>>> artifacts:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>> >>>>>>>>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
>> >>>> repo
>> >>>>>>>>> posted
>> >>>>>>>>> in this thread (
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
>> >>>>>>>>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>> >>>>>> removed
>> >>>>>>>>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>> >>>>>>>>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
>> >>>> our own
>> >>>>>>>>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/).
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
>> staged
>> >>>>>>>>> Maven
>> >>>>>>>>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the
>> source
>> >>>>>>>>> distribution,
>> >>>>>>>>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
>> >>>> time.
>> >>>>>>>>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >>>>>>>>> <tz...@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
>> will
>> >>>>>> have
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >>>> rmetzger@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>> >>>>>>>>>>> staging
>> >>>>>>>>>>> repository.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Found the culprit:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
>> >>>> parent
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> POM,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>> >>>> jars.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>> >>>>>> itself
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to
>> Maven.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
>> >>>> our own
>> >>>>>>>>>>> tooling
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
>> source
>> >>>>>>>>> tarballs
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files
>> Robert
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> found.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
>> >>>> fine to
>> >>>>>>>>> keep
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>> >>>> touched,
>> >>>>>>>>> only
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>> >>>> packaged
>> >>>>>>>>> for
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>> >>>>>> parent
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> module
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >>>>>> rmetzger@apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
>> maven
>> >>>>>>>>> staging
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
>> >>>> docs/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jekyll
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>> >>>>>>>>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>> >>>> release
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> maven
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> central?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>> >>>>>> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release
>> files
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
>> >>>> are
>> >>>>>>>>> sane
>> >>>>>>>>>>> (no
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>> >>>>>> bundled
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>> >>>> fastutil
>> >>>>>>>>> (
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
>> >>>> looks
>> >>>>>>>>> good.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator,
>> statefun-flink-core
>> >>>>>>>>> (copied
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources).
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain
>> ASLv2
>> >>>>>>>>> LICENSE
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
>> >>>> doc
>> >>>>>>>>>>> configs
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>> >>>> (mvn
>> >>>>>>>>>>> clean
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>> >>>> POM /
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / service file)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>> >>>> Greeter
>> >>>>>>>>> /
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS
>> ecosystem:
>> >>>>>>>>> remote
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
>> Java
>> >>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>> >>>> include
>> >>>>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4*
>> for
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> >>>> specific
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>> >>>>>>>>> collaborating
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>> >>>>>>>>> guideline
>> >>>>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>> >>>> put
>> >>>>>>>>>>> your
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
>> >>>> be
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>> >>>>>>>>> deployed
>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PyPI
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Repository
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
>> >>>> artifacts
>> >>>>>>>>>>> are as
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> corresponding
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> dev
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Repository
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images
>> for
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Stateful
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>> >>>>>>>>> creation
>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
>> already
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> deployed
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>> >>>> are
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> officially
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>> >>>> about
>> >>>>>>>>>>> where
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
>> on
>> >>>>>>>>> (by
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marta)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>> >>>>>>>>> Functions
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards
>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your
>> votes
>> >>>>>>>>>>> already.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being
>> worked
>> >>>> on,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>> >>>> there.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>> >>>> RCs,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>> >>>> Monday
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> >>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>> >>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>> >>>>>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>> >>>>>>>>> contents:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via
>> `--settings
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>> >>>> staged
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>> >>>> Apache
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Flink
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>> >>>> Germany
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>> >>>> Tung
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jason,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ji
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
I think I conceptually added everything Stephan mentioned into the Wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=97552147&selectedPageVersions=5&selectedPageVersions=3
I'm looking forward to any comments or corrections.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:20 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org> wrote:
> Let's add this information to the licensing wiki page.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>
>
> On 01/04/2020 12:16, Yu Li wrote:
> > Thanks Stephan, this is enlightening!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share
> >> what I did there.
> >>
> >> Source distribution:
> >> - This means code copied into the repo.
> >> - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code
> verbatim
> >> usually comment on that directly.
> >> - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
> >> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files,
> etc.
> >> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
> >>
> >> Binary distribution:
> >> - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
> >> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
> >> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
> >> - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important,
> because
> >> they bundle dependencies, which means
> >> (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
> >> (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> |
> >> grep ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile /
> >> provided is not straightforward in maven.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Stephan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Stephan,
> >>>
> >>> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
> >>> help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki
> [1]?
> >>> I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good
> way to
> >>> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such
> question
> >>> though. Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to
> 2.0.0
> >>> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Yu
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new
> RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
> >>>>
> >>>> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
> >>>> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
> >>>> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
> >>>> issue.
> >>>> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first"
> for
> >>>> all
> >>>> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
> >>>> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily
> large.
> >>>>
> >>>> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
> >>>> All issues are fixed in this PR:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
> >>>> blocker.
> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> >>>>>> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> >>>>>>> For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
> >>>> we
> >>>>>>> can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
> >>>>>>> modules.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
> at
> >>>>>>> licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
> in
> >>>>>>> these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
> >>>> before
> >>>>>>> opening another RC.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
> >>>> hence, -1.
> >>>>>>> On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Checked:
> >>>>>>>> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
> >>>> files,
> >>>>>>>> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> >>>>>>>> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
> >>>>>>>> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
> >>>>>>>> Kafka.
> >>>>>>>> The file states
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
> >>>>>> available
> >>>>>>>>> under the CDDL
> >>>>>>>>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> >>>>>>>> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
> >>>>>>>> META-INF/NOTICE).
> >>>>>>>> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing
> >>>> in
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
> >>>>>>>> this is
> >>>>>>>> not the right file,
> >>>>>>>> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
> at
> >>>>>>>> risk of
> >>>>>>>> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> >>>>>>>> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> >>>>>>>> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
> >>>>>>>> this RC
> >>>>>>>> gets cancelled again).
> >>>>>>>> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
> >>>> is
> >>>>>> MIT
> >>>>>>>> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
> license
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>> each copy of the source.
> >>>>>>>> apache/flink also has this file:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
> >>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
> >>>> this
> >>>>>>>> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
> generation?!)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
> >>>>>>>> file in
> >>>>>>>> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
> >>>>>>>> overlooked something and we can continue.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >>>>>>>> <tz...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ======= NOTICE =======
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
> the
> >>>>>>>>> Maven
> >>>>>>>>> artifacts:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> >>>>>>>>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
> >>>> repo
> >>>>>>>>> posted
> >>>>>>>>> in this thread (
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
> >>>>>>>>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
> >>>>>> removed
> >>>>>>>>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> >>>>>>>>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
> >>>> our own
> >>>>>>>>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
> staged
> >>>>>>>>> Maven
> >>>>>>>>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
> >>>>>>>>> distribution,
> >>>>>>>>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
> >>>> time.
> >>>>>>>>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >>>>>>>>> <tz...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
> will
> >>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
> >>>> rmetzger@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
> >>>>>>>>>>> staging
> >>>>>>>>>>> repository.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Found the culprit:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
> >>>> parent
> >>>>>>>>>>>> POM,
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
> >>>> jars.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
> >>>>>> itself
> >>>>>>>>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
> >>>> our own
> >>>>>>>>>>> tooling
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
> source
> >>>>>>>>> tarballs
> >>>>>>>>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
> >>>>>>>>>>>> found.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
> >>>> fine to
> >>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
> >>>> touched,
> >>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
> >>>> packaged
> >>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
> >>>>>> parent
> >>>>>>>>>>>> module
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> >>>>>> rmetzger@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
> maven
> >>>>>>>>> staging
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
> >>>> docs/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jekyll
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> >>>>>>>>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
> >>>> release
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> maven
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> central?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
> >>>>>> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
> >>>> are
> >>>>>>>>> sane
> >>>>>>>>>>> (no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
> >>>>>> bundled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
> >>>> fastutil
> >>>>>>>>> (
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
> >>>> looks
> >>>>>>>>> good.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
> >>>>>>>>> (copied
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
> >>>>>>>>> LICENSE
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
> >>>> doc
> >>>>>>>>>>> configs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
> >>>> (mvn
> >>>>>>>>>>> clean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
> >>>> POM /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / service file)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
> >>>> Greeter
> >>>>>>>>> /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
> >>>>>>>>> remote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
> Java
> >>>>>>>>>>> embedded
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
> >>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> >>>> specific
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> >>>>>>>>> collaborating
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> >>>>>>>>> guideline
> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
> >>>> put
> >>>>>>>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
> >>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> >>>>>>>>> deployed
> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PyPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> >>>>>>>>>>> Repository
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
> >>>> artifacts
> >>>>>>>>>>> are as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> >>>>>>>>>>> corresponding
> >>>>>>>>>>>> dev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Repository
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
> >>>>>>>>>>> Stateful
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> >>>>>>>>> creation
> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>> deployed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
> >>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> officially
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
> >>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>> where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
> on
> >>>>>>>>> (by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marta)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> >>>>>>>>> Functions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
> >>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>> vote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
> >>>>>>>>>>> already.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
> >>>> on,
> >>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
> >>>> there.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Here
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
> >>>> RCs,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
> >>>> Monday
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> >>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> >>>>>>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> >>>>>>>>> contents:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> >>>> staged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> >>>>>>>>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
> >>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>> Flink
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
> >>>> Germany
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
> >>>> Tung
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jason,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ji
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
Let's add this information to the licensing wiki page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
On 01/04/2020 12:16, Yu Li wrote:
> Thanks Stephan, this is enlightening!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share
>> what I did there.
>>
>> Source distribution:
>> - This means code copied into the repo.
>> - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code verbatim
>> usually comment on that directly.
>> - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
>> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files, etc.
>> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
>>
>> Binary distribution:
>> - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
>> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
>> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
>> - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important, because
>> they bundle dependencies, which means
>> (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
>> (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> |
>> grep ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile /
>> provided is not straightforward in maven.
>>
>> Best,
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Stephan,
>>>
>>> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
>>> help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]?
>>> I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
>>> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
>>> though. Thanks.
>>>
>>> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
>>> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Yu
>>>
>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
>>>>
>>>> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>>>>
>>>> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>>>> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>>>> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>>>> issue.
>>>> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
>>>> all
>>>> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>>>> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
>>>>
>>>> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>>>> All issues are fixed in this PR:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>>>> blocker.
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>>>>>> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>>>>> For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
>>>> we
>>>>>>> can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
>>>>>>> modules.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source at
>>>>>>> licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up in
>>>>>>> these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>>>> before
>>>>>>> opening another RC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
>>>> hence, -1.
>>>>>>> On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Checked:
>>>>>>>> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>>>> files,
>>>>>>>> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>>>>>>>> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>>>>>>>>
>>>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>>>>>>>> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
>>>>>>>> Kafka.
>>>>>>>> The file states
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>> under the CDDL
>>>>>>>>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>>>>>>>> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
>>>>>>>> META-INF/NOTICE).
>>>>>>>> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing
>>>> in
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
>>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>>> not the right file,
>>>>>>>> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be at
>>>>>>>> risk of
>>>>>>>> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>>>>>>>> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>>>>>>>> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
>>>>>>>> this RC
>>>>>>>> gets cancelled again).
>>>>>>>> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
>>>> is
>>>>>> MIT
>>>>>>>> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the license
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> each copy of the source.
>>>>>>>> apache/flink also has this file:
>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
>>>> this
>>>>>>>> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release generation?!)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
>>>>>>>> file in
>>>>>>>> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
>>>>>>>> overlooked something and we can continue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>>>>>>>> <tz...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ======= NOTICE =======
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for the
>>>>>>>>> Maven
>>>>>>>>> artifacts:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>>>>>>>>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>> posted
>>>>>>>>> in this thread (
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
>>>>>>>>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>>>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>>>>>>>>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
>>>> our own
>>>>>>>>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the staged
>>>>>>>>> Maven
>>>>>>>>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
>>>>>>>>> distribution,
>>>>>>>>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>>>>>>>>> <tz...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>>>> rmetzger@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>>>>>>>>>>> staging
>>>>>>>>>>> repository.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Found the culprit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
>>>> parent
>>>>>>>>>>>> POM,
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>>>> jars.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>>>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
>>>> our own
>>>>>>>>>>> tooling
>>>>>>>>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the source
>>>>>>>>> tarballs
>>>>>>>>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
>>>> fine to
>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>>>> touched,
>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>>>> packaged
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>>>>>> parent
>>>>>>>>>>>> module
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>>>>>> rmetzger@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven
>>>>>>>>> staging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
>>>> docs/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>> jekyll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>>>>>>>>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> central?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>>>>>> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> sane
>>>>>>>>>>> (no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>>>>>> bundled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>>>> fastutil
>>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
>>>>>>>>> (copied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
>>>>>>>>> LICENSE
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
>>>> doc
>>>>>>>>>>> configs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>>>> (mvn
>>>>>>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>>>> POM /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / service file)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>>>> Greeter
>>>>>>>>> /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
>>>>>>>>> remote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway, Java
>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>>> specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>>>>>>>>> collaborating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>>>>>>>>> guideline
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>>>> put
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>>>>>>>>> deployed
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PyPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>>>>>>>>> Repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>>>>>> are as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding
>>>>>>>>>>>> dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
>>>>>>>>>>> Stateful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>>>>>>>>> creation
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars already
>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked on
>>>>>>>>> (by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marta)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>>>>>>>>> Functions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
>>>> on,
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>> Here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>>>> RCs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>>>> Monday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>>>>>>>>> contents:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> """
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> """
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>>>> staged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>>>> Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>>>> Tung
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jason,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ji
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Stephan, this is enlightening!
Best Regards,
Yu
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share
> what I did there.
>
> Source distribution:
> - This means code copied into the repo.
> - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code verbatim
> usually comment on that directly.
> - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files, etc.
> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
>
> Binary distribution:
> - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
> - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important, because
> they bundle dependencies, which means
> (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
> (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> |
> grep ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile /
> provided is not straightforward in maven.
>
> Best,
> Stephan
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephan,
>>
>> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
>> help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]?
>> I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
>> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
>> though. Thanks.
>>
>> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
>> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
>>>
>>> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>>>
>>> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>>> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>>> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>>> issue.
>>> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
>>> all
>>> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>>> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
>>>
>>> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>>> All issues are fixed in this PR:
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>>> >
>>> > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>>> blocker.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>>> >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>> >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
>>> we
>>> >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
>>> >> > modules.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source at
>>> >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up in
>>> >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>>> before
>>> >> > opening another RC.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
>>> hence, -1.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>>> >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Checked:
>>> >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>>> files,
>>> >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>>> >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>>> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
>>> >> >> Kafka.
>>> >> >> The file states
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>>> >> available
>>> >> >>> under the CDDL
>>> >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>>> >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>>> >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
>>> >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
>>> >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing
>>> in
>>> >> >> that
>>> >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
>>> >> >> this is
>>> >> >> not the right file,
>>> >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be at
>>> >> >> risk of
>>> >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>>> >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>>> >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
>>> >> >> this RC
>>> >> >> gets cancelled again).
>>> >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
>>> is
>>> >> MIT
>>> >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the license
>>> >> with
>>> >> >> each copy of the source.
>>> >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
>>> >> >>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
>>> >>
>>> >> >> but
>>> >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
>>> this
>>> >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release generation?!)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
>>> >> >> file in
>>> >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
>>> >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>>> >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for the
>>> >> >>> Maven
>>> >> >>> artifacts:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
>>> repo
>>> >> >>> posted
>>> >> >>> in this thread (
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>>> >> removed
>>> >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>>> >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
>>> our own
>>> >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/).
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the staged
>>> >> >>> Maven
>>> >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
>>> >> >>> distribution,
>>> >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
>>> time.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>>> >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will
>>> >> have
>>> >> >>> the
>>> >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>>> rmetzger@apache.org>
>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>>> >> >>>>> staging
>>> >> >>>>> repository.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>> >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
>>> parent
>>> >> >>>>>> POM,
>>> >> >>>>> and
>>> >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>>> jars.
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>>> >> itself
>>> >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
>>> >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
>>> our own
>>> >> >>>>> tooling
>>> >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the source
>>> >> >>> tarballs
>>> >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
>>> >> >>>>>> found.
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
>>> fine to
>>> >> >>> keep
>>> >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>>> touched,
>>> >> >>> only
>>> >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>> >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>>> packaged
>>> >> >>> for
>>> >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>>> >> parent
>>> >> >>>>>> module
>>> >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>>> >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>>> >> rmetzger@apache.org
>>> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>>> >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven
>>> >> >>> staging
>>> >> >>>>>>>> repo:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
>>> docs/
>>> >> >>>>>>>> from
>>> >> >>>>>> jekyll
>>> >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>>> >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>>> >> >>>>> I
>>> >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>>> release
>>> >> >>> to
>>> >> >>>>>> maven
>>> >> >>>>>>>> central?
>>> >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>>> >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>> >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
>>> are
>>> >> >>> sane
>>> >> >>>>> (no
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>>> >> bundled
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>>> fastutil
>>> >> >>> (
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
>>> looks
>>> >> >>> good.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>>> >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
>>> >> >>> (copied
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
>>> >> >>> LICENSE
>>> >> >>>>>> and
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
>>> doc
>>> >> >>>>> configs
>>> >> >>>>>>>> point
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>>> (mvn
>>> >> >>>>> clean
>>> >> >>>>>>>> verify
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>>> POM /
>>> >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>>> Greeter
>>> >> >>> /
>>> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
>>> >> >>> remote
>>> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway, Java
>>> >> >>>>> embedded
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>> >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>>> include
>>> >> >>>>> this
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> release.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
>>> the
>>> >> >>>>>>>> version
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>> specific
>>> >> >>>>>>>> comments)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>>> >> >>> collaborating
>>> >> >>>>>>>> testing
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>>> >> >>> guideline
>>> >> >>>>> in
>>> >> >>>>>>>> what
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> to
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>>> put
>>> >> >>>>> your
>>> >> >>>>>>>> name
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
>>> be
>>> >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>>> >> >>> deployed
>>> >> >>>>> to
>>> >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>> >> >>>>> Repository
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
>>> artifacts
>>> >> >>>>> are as
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>>> >> >>>>> corresponding
>>> >> >>>>>> dev
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>>> >> >>>>>> Repository
>>> >> >>>>>>>> [3]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
>>> >> >>>>> Stateful
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>>> >> >>> creation
>>> >> >>>>> of
>>> >> >>>>>>>> those
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars already
>>> >> >>>>>> deployed
>>> >> >>>>>>>> to
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>>> are
>>> >> >>>>>>>> officially
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>>> about
>>> >> >>>>> where
>>> >> >>>>>>>> to
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked on
>>> >> >>> (by
>>> >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> as
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>>> >> >>> Functions
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> project.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
>>> >> >>> this
>>> >> >>>>>> vote
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
>>> >> >>>>> already.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
>>> on,
>>> >> >>>>> you
>>> >> >>>>>>>> will
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>>> there.
>>> >> >>>>> Here
>>> >> >>>>>>>> are
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> the
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>>> RCs,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>>> Monday
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>>> >> >>>>>> affirmative
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>>> >> >>> contents:
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>>> staged
>>> >> >>>>>>>> release
>>> >> >>>>>>>>> and
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>>> >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>>> Apache
>>> >> >>>>> Flink
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>>> Germany
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>>> Tung
>>> >> >>>>>> Jason,
>>> >> >>>>>>>> Ji
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by "Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai" <tz...@apache.org>.
This vote thread is cancelled.
Please refer to the new RC5:
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Flink-Stateful-Functions-Release-2-0-0-release-candidate-5-td39648.html
.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:39 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tz...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks for all the efforts on checking the licenses.
>
> It seems that we're now on a good state to start a new RC with the various
> license fixes.
> Will post the RC5 vote thread shortly after.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:30 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share
>> what
>> I did there.
>>
>> Source distribution:
>> - This means code copied into the repo.
>> - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code verbatim
>> usually comment on that directly.
>> - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
>> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files, etc.
>> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
>>
>> Binary distribution:
>> - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
>> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
>> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
>> - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important, because
>> they bundle dependencies, which means
>> (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
>> (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> |
>> grep
>> ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile / provided
>> is not straightforward in maven.
>>
>> Best,
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Stephan,
>> >
>> > Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
>> > help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki
>> [1]?
>> > I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good
>> way to
>> > do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
>> > though. Thanks.
>> >
>> > btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
>> > but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yu
>> >
>> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>> >
>> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new
>> RC.
>> >>
>> >> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>> >>
>> >> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>> >> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>> >> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>> >> issue.
>> >> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
>> all
>> >> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>> >> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily
>> large.
>> >>
>> >> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>> >> All issues are fixed in this PR:
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>> >> >
>> >> > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>> >> blocker.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>> >> >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> >> >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far
>> as we
>> >> >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the
>> flink-sql-connector-kafka
>> >> >> > modules.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
>> at
>> >> >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
>> in
>> >> >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>> >> before
>> >> >> > opening another RC.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
>> hence,
>> >> -1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> >> >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Checked:
>> >> >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>> >> files,
>> >> >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>> >> >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from
>> Apache
>> >> >> >> Kafka.
>> >> >> >> The file states
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>> >> >> available
>> >> >> >>> under the CDDL
>> >> >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>> >> >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>> >> >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located
>> in
>> >> >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
>> >> >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be
>> confusing
>> >> in
>> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue
>> that
>> >> >> >> this is
>> >> >> >> not the right file,
>> >> >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
>> at
>> >> >> >> risk of
>> >> >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>> >> >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>> >> >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or
>> if
>> >> >> >> this RC
>> >> >> >> gets cancelled again).
>> >> >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js",
>> which is
>> >> >> MIT
>> >> >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
>> license
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> >> each copy of the source.
>> >> >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js
>> ,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> but
>> >> >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even
>> though
>> >> this
>> >> >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
>> generation?!)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing
>> license
>> >> >> >> file in
>> >> >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I
>> have
>> >> >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >> >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
>> the
>> >> >> >>> Maven
>> >> >> >>> artifacts:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
>> repo
>> >> >> >>> posted
>> >> >> >>> in this thread (
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>> >> >> removed
>> >> >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>> >> >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
>> our
>> >> own
>> >> >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> >> ).
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
>> staged
>> >> >> >>> Maven
>> >> >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the
>> source
>> >> >> >>> distribution,
>> >> >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
>> time.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >> >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
>> will
>> >> >> have
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >> rmetzger@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>> >> >> >>>>> staging
>> >> >> >>>>> repository.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
>> parent
>> >> >> >>>>>> POM,
>> >> >> >>>>> and
>> >> >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>> >> jars.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>> >> >> itself
>> >> >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to
>> Maven.
>> >> >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
>> our
>> >> own
>> >> >> >>>>> tooling
>> >> >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
>> source
>> >> >> >>> tarballs
>> >> >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files
>> Robert
>> >> >> >>>>>> found.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
>> fine
>> >> to
>> >> >> >>> keep
>> >> >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>> >> touched,
>> >> >> >>> only
>> >> >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>> >> packaged
>> >> >> >>> for
>> >> >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>> >> >> parent
>> >> >> >>>>>> module
>> >> >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>> >> >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >> >> rmetzger@apache.org
>> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
>> maven
>> >> >> >>> staging
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> repo:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
>> docs/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> from
>> >> >> >>>>>> jekyll
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>> >> >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>> >> >> >>>>> I
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>> >> release
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>> maven
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> central?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>> >> >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release
>> files
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
>> are
>> >> >> >>> sane
>> >> >> >>>>> (no
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>> >> >> bundled
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>> >> fastutil
>> >> >> >>> (
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
>> looks
>> >> >> >>> good.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>> >> >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator,
>> statefun-flink-core
>> >> >> >>> (copied
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain
>> ASLv2
>> >> >> >>> LICENSE
>> >> >> >>>>>> and
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
>> doc
>> >> >> >>>>> configs
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> point
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>> >> (mvn
>> >> >> >>>>> clean
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> verify
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>> >> POM /
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>> >> Greeter
>> >> >> >>> /
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS
>> ecosystem:
>> >> >> >>> remote
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
>> Java
>> >> >> >>>>> embedded
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>> >> include
>> >> >> >>>>> this
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> release.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4*
>> for
>> >> the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> version
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> >> specific
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> comments)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>> >> >> >>> collaborating
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> testing
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>> >> >> >>> guideline
>> >> >> >>>>> in
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> what
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>> >> put
>> >> >> >>>>> your
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> name
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution,
>> to be
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>> >> >> >>> deployed
>> >> >> >>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> >> >> >>>>> Repository
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
>> artifacts
>> >> >> >>>>> are as
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>> >> >> >>>>> corresponding
>> >> >> >>>>>> dev
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>> >> >> >>>>>> Repository
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> [3]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images
>> for
>> >> >> >>>>> Stateful
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>> >> >> >>> creation
>> >> >> >>>>> of
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> those
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
>> already
>> >> >> >>>>>> deployed
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>> >> are
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> officially
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>> >> about
>> >> >> >>>>> where
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
>> on
>> >> >> >>> (by
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> as
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>> >> >> >>> Functions
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> project.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards
>> in
>> >> >> >>> this
>> >> >> >>>>>> vote
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your
>> votes
>> >> >> >>>>> already.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being
>> worked
>> >> on,
>> >> >> >>>>> you
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> will
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>> >> there.
>> >> >> >>>>> Here
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> are
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>> >> RCs,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>> >> Monday
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> >> >> >>>>>> affirmative
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>> >> >> >>> contents:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via
>> `--settings
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>> >> staged
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> release
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>> >> >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>> >> Apache
>> >> >> >>>>> Flink
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>> >> Germany
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>> >> Tung
>> >> >> >>>>>> Jason,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Ji
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by "Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai" <tz...@apache.org>.
Thanks for all the efforts on checking the licenses.
It seems that we're now on a good state to start a new RC with the various
license fixes.
Will post the RC5 vote thread shortly after.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:30 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share what
> I did there.
>
> Source distribution:
> - This means code copied into the repo.
> - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code verbatim
> usually comment on that directly.
> - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files, etc.
> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
>
> Binary distribution:
> - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
> - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important, because
> they bundle dependencies, which means
> (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
> (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> | grep
> ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile / provided
> is not straightforward in maven.
>
> Best,
> Stephan
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephan,
> >
> > Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
> > help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki
> [1]?
> > I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way
> to
> > do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
> > though. Thanks.
> >
> > btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
> > but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
> >>
> >> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
> >>
> >> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
> >> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
> >> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
> >> issue.
> >> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
> all
> >> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
> >> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
> >>
> >> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
> >> All issues are fixed in this PR:
> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
> >> >
> >> > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
> >> blocker.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> >> >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> >> >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as
> we
> >> >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
> >> >> > modules.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
> at
> >> >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
> in
> >> >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
> >> before
> >> >> > opening another RC.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
> hence,
> >> -1.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >> >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Checked:
> >> >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
> >> files,
> >> >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> >> >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
> >> >> >> Kafka.
> >> >> >> The file states
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
> >> >> available
> >> >> >>> under the CDDL
> >> >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> >> >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> >> >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
> >> >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
> >> >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing
> >> in
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
> >> >> >> this is
> >> >> >> not the right file,
> >> >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
> at
> >> >> >> risk of
> >> >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> >> >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> >> >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
> >> >> >> this RC
> >> >> >> gets cancelled again).
> >> >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which
> is
> >> >> MIT
> >> >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
> license
> >> >> with
> >> >> >> each copy of the source.
> >> >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
> >> >> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
> >> >>
> >> >> >> but
> >> >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
> >> this
> >> >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
> generation?!)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
> >> >> >> file in
> >> >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
> >> >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
> the
> >> >> >>> Maven
> >> >> >>> artifacts:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
> repo
> >> >> >>> posted
> >> >> >>> in this thread (
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> )
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
> >> >> removed
> >> >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> >> >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
> our
> >> own
> >> >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >> ).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
> staged
> >> >> >>> Maven
> >> >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
> >> >> >>> distribution,
> >> >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
> time.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
> will
> >> >> have
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
> >> rmetzger@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
> >> >> >>>>> staging
> >> >> >>>>> repository.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
> parent
> >> >> >>>>>> POM,
> >> >> >>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
> >> jars.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
> >> >> itself
> >> >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
> >> >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
> our
> >> own
> >> >> >>>>> tooling
> >> >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
> source
> >> >> >>> tarballs
> >> >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
> >> >> >>>>>> found.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
> fine
> >> to
> >> >> >>> keep
> >> >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
> >> touched,
> >> >> >>> only
> >> >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
> >> packaged
> >> >> >>> for
> >> >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
> >> >> parent
> >> >> >>>>>> module
> >> >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> >> >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> >> >> rmetzger@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> >> >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
> maven
> >> >> >>> staging
> >> >> >>>>>>>> repo:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
> docs/
> >> >> >>>>>>>> from
> >> >> >>>>>> jekyll
> >> >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> >> >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> >> >> >>>>> I
> >> >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
> >> release
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>>>>> maven
> >> >> >>>>>>>> central?
> >> >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
> >> >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
> are
> >> >> >>> sane
> >> >> >>>>> (no
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
> >> >> bundled
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
> >> fastutil
> >> >> >>> (
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
> looks
> >> >> >>> good.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> >> >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
> >> >> >>> (copied
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
> >> >> >>> LICENSE
> >> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
> doc
> >> >> >>>>> configs
> >> >> >>>>>>>> point
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
> >> (mvn
> >> >> >>>>> clean
> >> >> >>>>>>>> verify
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
> >> POM /
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
> >> Greeter
> >> >> >>> /
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Python
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
> >> >> >>> remote
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Python
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
> Java
> >> >> >>>>> embedded
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
> >> include
> >> >> >>>>> this
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
> >> the
> >> >> >>>>>>>> version
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> >> specific
> >> >> >>>>>>>> comments)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> >> >> >>> collaborating
> >> >> >>>>>>>> testing
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> >> >> >>> guideline
> >> >> >>>>> in
> >> >> >>>>>>>> what
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
> >> put
> >> >> >>>>> your
> >> >> >>>>>>>> name
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to
> be
> >> >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> >> >> >>> deployed
> >> >> >>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> >> >> >>>>> Repository
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
> artifacts
> >> >> >>>>> are as
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> >> >> >>>>> corresponding
> >> >> >>>>>> dev
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> >> >> >>>>>> Repository
> >> >> >>>>>>>> [3]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
> >> >> >>>>> Stateful
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> >> >> >>> creation
> >> >> >>>>> of
> >> >> >>>>>>>> those
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
> already
> >> >> >>>>>> deployed
> >> >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
> >> are
> >> >> >>>>>>>> officially
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
> >> about
> >> >> >>>>> where
> >> >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
> on
> >> >> >>> (by
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> as
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> >> >> >>> Functions
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> project.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
> >> >> >>> this
> >> >> >>>>>> vote
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
> >> >> >>>>> already.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
> >> on,
> >> >> >>>>> you
> >> >> >>>>>>>> will
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
> >> there.
> >> >> >>>>> Here
> >> >> >>>>>>>> are
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
> >> RCs,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
> >> Monday
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >> >> >>>>>> affirmative
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> >> >> >>> contents:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> >> staged
> >> >> >>>>>>>> release
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> >> >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
> >> Apache
> >> >> >>>>> Flink
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
> >> Germany
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
> >> Tung
> >> >> >>>>>> Jason,
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Ji
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release
candidate #4
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
@Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share what
I did there.
Source distribution:
- This means code copied into the repo.
- The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code verbatim
usually comment on that directly.
- Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files, etc.
So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
Binary distribution:
- To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
- Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important, because
they bundle dependencies, which means
(a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
(b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> | grep
... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile / provided
is not straightforward in maven.
Best,
Stephan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
> help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki [1]?
> I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good way to
> do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
> though. Thanks.
>
> btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
> but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new RC.
>>
>> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>>
>> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>> - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>> issue.
>> - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for all
>> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily large.
>>
>> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>> All issues are fixed in this PR:
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>> >
>> > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>> blocker.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>> >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as we
>> >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
>> >> > modules.
>> >> >
>> >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source at
>> >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up in
>> >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>> before
>> >> > opening another RC.
>> >> >
>> >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation, hence,
>> -1.
>> >> >
>> >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Checked:
>> >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>> files,
>> >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>> >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
>> >> >> Kafka.
>> >> >> The file states
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>> >> available
>> >> >>> under the CDDL
>> >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>> >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>> >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
>> >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
>> >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing
>> in
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
>> >> >> this is
>> >> >> not the right file,
>> >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be at
>> >> >> risk of
>> >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>> >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>> >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
>> >> >> this RC
>> >> >> gets cancelled again).
>> >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which is
>> >> MIT
>> >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the license
>> >> with
>> >> >> each copy of the source.
>> >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
>> >> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
>> >>
>> >> >> but
>> >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though
>> this
>> >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release generation?!)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
>> >> >> file in
>> >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
>> >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >> >> <tz...@apache.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for the
>> >> >>> Maven
>> >> >>> artifacts:
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original repo
>> >> >>> posted
>> >> >>> in this thread (
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>> >> removed
>> >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>> >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use our
>> own
>> >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>> >> >>>
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> ).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the staged
>> >> >>> Maven
>> >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
>> >> >>> distribution,
>> >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end time.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >> >>> <tz...@apache.org>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will
>> >> have
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>> rmetzger@apache.org>
>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>> >> >>>>> staging
>> >> >>>>> repository.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the parent
>> >> >>>>>> POM,
>> >> >>>>> and
>> >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>> jars.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>> >> itself
>> >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
>> >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use our
>> own
>> >> >>>>> tooling
>> >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the source
>> >> >>> tarballs
>> >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
>> >> >>>>>> found.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely fine
>> to
>> >> >>> keep
>> >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>> touched,
>> >> >>> only
>> >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>> packaged
>> >> >>> for
>> >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>> >> parent
>> >> >>>>>> module
>> >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>> >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >> rmetzger@apache.org
>> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>> >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven
>> >> >>> staging
>> >> >>>>>>>> repo:
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in docs/
>> >> >>>>>>>> from
>> >> >>>>>> jekyll
>> >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>> >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>> >> >>>>> I
>> >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>> release
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>>>>> maven
>> >> >>>>>>>> central?
>> >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>> >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents are
>> >> >>> sane
>> >> >>>>> (no
>> >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>> >> bundled
>> >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>> fastutil
>> >> >>> (
>> >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts looks
>> >> >>> good.
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>> >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>> >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
>> >> >>> (copied
>> >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
>> >> >>> LICENSE
>> >> >>>>>> and
>> >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles / doc
>> >> >>>>> configs
>> >> >>>>>>>> point
>> >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>> (mvn
>> >> >>>>> clean
>> >> >>>>>>>> verify
>> >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>> POM /
>> >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>> >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>> Greeter
>> >> >>> /
>> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>> >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
>> >> >>> remote
>> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway, Java
>> >> >>>>> embedded
>> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>> include
>> >> >>>>> this
>> >> >>>>>>>>> release.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>> >> >>>>>>>>> konstantin@ververica.com>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >>>>>>>>> tzulitai@apache.org>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for
>> the
>> >> >>>>>>>> version
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> specific
>> >> >>>>>>>> comments)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>> >> >>> collaborating
>> >> >>>>>>>> testing
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>> >> >>> guideline
>> >> >>>>> in
>> >> >>>>>>>> what
>> >> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>> put
>> >> >>>>> your
>> >> >>>>>>>> name
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to be
>> >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>> >> >>> deployed
>> >> >>>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> >> >>>>> Repository
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned artifacts
>> >> >>>>> are as
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>> >> >>>>> corresponding
>> >> >>>>>> dev
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>> >> >>>>>> Repository
>> >> >>>>>>>> [3]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
>> >> >>>>> Stateful
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>> >> >>> creation
>> >> >>>>> of
>> >> >>>>>>>> those
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars already
>> >> >>>>>> deployed
>> >> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>> are
>> >> >>>>>>>> officially
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>> about
>> >> >>>>> where
>> >> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked on
>> >> >>> (by
>> >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> as
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>> >> >>> Functions
>> >> >>>>>>>>> project.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
>> >> >>> this
>> >> >>>>>> vote
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
>> >> >>>>> already.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked
>> on,
>> >> >>>>> you
>> >> >>>>>>>> will
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>> there.
>> >> >>>>> Here
>> >> >>>>>>>> are
>> >> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>> RCs,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>> Monday
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> >> >>>>>> affirmative
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>> >> >>> contents:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfiles>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </activeProfiles>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profiles>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <profile>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>archetype</id>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <url>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profile>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </profiles>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>> staged
>> >> >>>>>>>> release
>> >> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>> >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>> Apache
>> >> >>>>> Flink
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>> Germany
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>> Tung
>> >> >>>>>> Jason,
>> >> >>>>>>>> Ji
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>