Re: svn commit: r433152 - in /directory/branches/apacheds/1.0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/subtree: Subentry.java SubentryCache.java SubentryService.java SubtreeCache.java

[Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On 8/21/06, akarasulu@apache.org <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: akarasulu
> Date: Sun Aug 20 22:14:20 2006
> New Revision: 433152
...
> --- directory/branches/apacheds/1.0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/subtree/Subentry.java (added)
> +++ directory/branches/apacheds/1.0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/subtree/Subentry.java Sun Aug 20 22:14:20 2006
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +/*
> + *   Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation
> + *
> + *   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
> + *   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> + *   You may obtain a copy of the License at
> + *
> + *       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> + *
> + *   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
> + *   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
> + *   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
> + *   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
> + *   limitations under the License.
> + *
> + */
> +package org.apache.directory.server.core.subtree;
> +
> +
> +import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.subtree.SubtreeSpecification;
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * An operational view of a subentry within the system.
> + *
> + * @author <a href="mailto:dev@directory.apache.org">Apache Directory Project</a>
> + * @version $Rev$
> + */
> +public class Subentry
> +{
> +    static final int COLLECTIVE_SUBENTRY = 1;
> +    static final int SCHEMA_SUBENTRY = 2;
> +    static final int ACCESS_CONTROL_SUBENTRY = 4;
> +    static final int AUTONOMOUS_AREA_SUBENTRY = 8;
> +
> +    private SubtreeSpecification ss;
> +    private int type;
> +
> +
> +    final void setSubtreeSpecification( SubtreeSpecification ss )
> +    {
> +        this.ss = ss;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final SubtreeSpecification getSubtreeSpecification()
> +    {
> +        return ss;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final void setTypes( int type )
> +    {
> +        this.type = type;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final int getTypes()
> +    {
> +        return type;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final boolean isCollectiveSubentry()
> +    {
> +        return ( COLLECTIVE_SUBENTRY & type ) == COLLECTIVE_SUBENTRY;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final boolean isSchemaSubentry()
> +    {
> +        return ( SCHEMA_SUBENTRY & type ) == SCHEMA_SUBENTRY;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final boolean isAccessControlSubentry()
> +    {
> +        return ( ACCESS_CONTROL_SUBENTRY & type ) == ACCESS_CONTROL_SUBENTRY;
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    final boolean isAutonomousAreaSubentry()
> +    {
> +        return ( AUTONOMOUS_AREA_SUBENTRY & type ) == AUTONOMOUS_AREA_SUBENTRY;
> +    }
> +}

Alex,

We might also need accessControlScheme information associated with
access control subenries. So having a full object model might be
better here for future needs. I mean seperate classes for subentry
types.

Cheers,

-- 
Ersin