You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/04 03:59:33 UTC

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-13373) Squash HFileReaderV3 together with HFileReaderV2 and AbstractHFileReader; ditto for Scanners and BlockReader, etc.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

stack reopened HBASE-13373:
---------------------------

Reverted from branch-1. The migration tests are failing.  Will look into why later.

> Squash HFileReaderV3 together with HFileReaderV2 and AbstractHFileReader; ditto for Scanners and BlockReader, etc.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13373
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13373
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-HBASE-13373-Squash-HFileReaderV3-together-with-HFile.patch, 13373.txt, 13373.v3.txt, 13373.v3.txt, 13373.v5.txt, 13373.v6.txt, 13373.v6.txt, 13373.v6.txt, 13373.v6.txt, 13373.v6.txt, 13373.wip.txt
>
>
> Profiling I actually ran into case where complaint that could not inline because:
> MaxInlineLevel maximum number of nested calls that are inlined 9 intx
> i.e. method was more than 9 levels deep.
> The HFileReaderV? with Abstracts is not needed anymore now we are into the clear with V3 enabled since hbase 1.0.0; we can have just an Interface and an implementation.  If we need to support a new hfile type, can hopefully do it in a backward compatible way now we have Cell Interface, etc.
> Squashing all this stuff together actually makes it easier figuring what is going on when reading code. I can also get rid of a bunch of duplication too.
> Attached is a WIP. Doesn't fully compile yet but you get the idea.
> I'll keep on unless objection. Will try it against data written with old classes as soon as I have something working. I don't believe we write classnames into our data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)