You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/01/01 17:37:13 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1636) Class dependencies for the spark module are put in a job.jar, which is very inefficient

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14262592#comment-14262592 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1636:
----------------------------------------

Github user pferrel commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/69#issuecomment-68490981
  
    Good.
    
    Actually I wish you would comment on how we should structure the build. I'll post an email to the dev list, this one has become a TL;DR candidate.


> Class dependencies for the spark module are put in a job.jar, which is very inefficient
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-1636
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1636
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spark
>    Affects Versions: 1.0-snapshot
>            Reporter: Pat Ferrel
>            Assignee: Ted Dunning
>             Fix For: 1.0-snapshot
>
>
> using a maven plugin and an assembly job.xml a job.jar is created with all dependencies including transitive ones. This job.jar is in mahout/spark/target and is included in the classpath when a Spark job is run. This allows dependency classes to be found at runtime but the job.jar include a great deal of things not needed that are duplicates of classes found in the main mrlegacy job.jar.  If the job.jar is removed, drivers will not find needed classes. A better way needs to be implemented for including class dependencies.
> I'm not sure what that better way is so am leaving the assembly alone for now. Whoever picks up this Jira will have to remove it after deciding on a better method.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)