You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2013/04/14 20:51:11 UTC
upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery available to everyone ASAP.
Comments?
A.
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Fluent API is available via Property methods (i.e for query qualifiers). Also there is ObjectContext.select() method that is a previously missing link for any kind of generic List<T> type results. But yeah, there's still more work ahead of us in this area.
Andrus
On Apr 14, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
> On 15/04/13 4:51am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery available to everyone ASAP.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> Certainly cannot hurt. However where did the conversation end about the fluent (active record) style approach for queries? We seem to have discussed it on multiple occasions and there was the old task CAY-877.
>
> Ari
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
On 15/04/13 4:51am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery available to everyone ASAP.
>
> Comments?
Certainly cannot hurt. However where did the conversation end about the fluent (active record) style approach for queries? We seem to have discussed it on multiple occasions and there was the old task CAY-877.
Ari
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by John Huss <jo...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good to me.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:
> Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery
> available to everyone ASAP.
>
> Comments?
>
> A.
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Yes the page would be great. Which version of Cayenne is now "mythical"?
What changes would dropping JDK1.5 allow? Would a rewrite of the JDBC layer be appropriate to take advantage of any new features? I can't say I've poked around much in that part of Cayenne.
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2007/04/10/whats-new-in-jdbc-40.html
Ari
On 17/04/13 7:20am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> They are welcome to use 3.1 :) I'd like to create a page similar to Jetty in the docs:
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/what-jetty-version.html
>
> This would allow anyone to find *their* version of Cayenne.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> *someone* will ... :-)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Thinking of it, maybe before the release we should announce a minimal
>>> requirement to be Java 1.6 for Cayenne 3.2. We've discussed it before [1],
>>> and there's been 9 months since then, so I don't think there's anyone
>>> around who still cares about Java 5.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7wr52lfm4kosqntf
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery
>>> available to everyone ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>> A.
>>>
>>>
>
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
They are welcome to use 3.1 :) I'd like to create a page similar to Jetty in the docs:
http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/what-jetty-version.html
This would allow anyone to find *their* version of Cayenne.
Andrus
On Apr 16, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> *someone* will ... :-)
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:
>
>> Thinking of it, maybe before the release we should announce a minimal
>> requirement to be Java 1.6 for Cayenne 3.2. We've discussed it before [1],
>> and there's been 9 months since then, so I don't think there's anyone
>> around who still cares about Java 5.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7wr52lfm4kosqntf
>>
>> On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery
>> available to everyone ASAP.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> A.
>>
>>
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
*someone* will ... :-)
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:
> Thinking of it, maybe before the release we should announce a minimal
> requirement to be Java 1.6 for Cayenne 3.2. We've discussed it before [1],
> and there's been 9 months since then, so I don't think there's anyone
> around who still cares about Java 5.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7wr52lfm4kosqntf
>
> On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery
> available to everyone ASAP.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > A.
>
>
Re: upcoming 3.2M1 release vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Thinking of it, maybe before the release we should announce a minimal requirement to be Java 1.6 for Cayenne 3.2. We've discussed it before [1], and there's been 9 months since then, so I don't think there's anyone around who still cares about Java 5.
Andrus
[1] http://markmail.org/message/7wr52lfm4kosqntf
On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Thinking of starting 3.2M1 vote soon. Want generified SelectQuery available to everyone ASAP.
>
> Comments?
>
> A.