You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by JohnBrown <mi...@softasap.net> on 2007/12/18 22:04:32 UTC
product price purpose
Hi All,
I wonder why there is no "SELL" purpose price type by default in the data
seed? there are only a few:
PURCHASE
RECURRING_CHARGE
USAGE_CHARGE
COMPONENT_PRICE
>From what I understand PURCHASE purpose is to mark actually the cost of
product supplier charges us. But then the logical question arises why there
is no mirror entry with SELL type id to mark the sell price we charge the
customer?
I appreciate any replies on it. Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/product-price-purpose-tp14405644p14405644.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: product price purpose
Posted by BJ Freeman <bj...@free-man.net>.
there can be a lot of sell prices.
the Default price is usually the one you sell for.
COMPONENT_PRICE is the one you need.
JohnBrown sent the following on 12/18/2007 1:04 PM:
> Hi All,
>
> I wonder why there is no "SELL" purpose price type by default in the data
> seed? there are only a few:
>
>
>
> PURCHASE
>
> RECURRING_CHARGE
>
> USAGE_CHARGE
>
> COMPONENT_PRICE
>
>
>>>From what I understand PURCHASE purpose is to mark actually the cost of
> product supplier charges us. But then the logical question arises why there
> is no mirror entry with SELL type id to mark the sell price we charge the
> customer?
>
> I appreciate any replies on it. Thanks.
>
Re: product price purpose
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ti...@sastau.it>.
JohnBrown wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Do you mean that "PURCHASE" purpose in this case means actually SELL
> purpose?
Yes
> Ongoing question is where in ofbiz the proper place to store the
> cost of the product, the cost which supplier charges us. I use
> 'SupplierProduct.lastPrice' field, is that it?
Yes, that is the correct place.
>
> Again, thanks for the replies.
>
You are welcome
Jacopo
>
>
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I agree it is a bit confusing, but PURCHASE is what you are looking for.
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> JohnBrown wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I wonder why there is no "SELL" purpose price type by default in the data
>>> seed? there are only a few:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PURCHASE
>>>
>>> RECURRING_CHARGE
>>>
>>> USAGE_CHARGE
>>>
>>> COMPONENT_PRICE
>>>
>>>
>>> >From what I understand PURCHASE purpose is to mark actually the cost of
>>> product supplier charges us. But then the logical question arises why
>>> there
>>> is no mirror entry with SELL type id to mark the sell price we charge the
>>> customer?
>>>
>>> I appreciate any replies on it. Thanks.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: product price purpose
Posted by JohnBrown <mi...@softasap.net>.
Hi Jacopo,
Do you mean that "PURCHASE" purpose in this case means actually SELL
purpose? Ongoing question is where in ofbiz the proper place to store the
cost of the product, the cost which supplier charges us. I use
'SupplierProduct.lastPrice' field, is that it?
Again, thanks for the replies.
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> I agree it is a bit confusing, but PURCHASE is what you are looking for.
>
> Jacopo
>
> JohnBrown wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I wonder why there is no "SELL" purpose price type by default in the data
>> seed? there are only a few:
>>
>>
>>
>> PURCHASE
>>
>> RECURRING_CHARGE
>>
>> USAGE_CHARGE
>>
>> COMPONENT_PRICE
>>
>>
>>>>From what I understand PURCHASE purpose is to mark actually the cost of
>> product supplier charges us. But then the logical question arises why
>> there
>> is no mirror entry with SELL type id to mark the sell price we charge the
>> customer?
>>
>> I appreciate any replies on it. Thanks.
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/product-price-purpose-tp14405644p14405960.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: product price purpose
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ti...@sastau.it>.
Hi John,
I agree it is a bit confusing, but PURCHASE is what you are looking for.
Jacopo
JohnBrown wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wonder why there is no "SELL" purpose price type by default in the data
> seed? there are only a few:
>
>
>
> PURCHASE
>
> RECURRING_CHARGE
>
> USAGE_CHARGE
>
> COMPONENT_PRICE
>
>
>>>From what I understand PURCHASE purpose is to mark actually the cost of
> product supplier charges us. But then the logical question arises why there
> is no mirror entry with SELL type id to mark the sell price we charge the
> customer?
>
> I appreciate any replies on it. Thanks.
>