You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fx-dev@ws.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2004/05/27 09:54:44 UTC
Re: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
#1: New versions of the specs are already out -
http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/Collateral.asp?CID=59565&ID=4714
#2: WSE 2.0 Final is out as well -
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=FC5F06C5-821F-41D3-A4FE-6C7B56423841&displaylang=en
WSE 2.0 Final implements the updated WS-Trust and
WS-SecureConversation specs (#1). So please don't code to the old
spec. Let's use the new spec.
thanks,
dims
PS: Please send emails directly to the mailing list. thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dimuthu Leelarathne. <mu...@opensource.lk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:04:24 +0600
Subject: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
To: dims@yahoo.com
Hi Dims,
We decided to continue coding according to the
current specification, and later adapt to the changes in the new specification.
We talked to Dr.Sanjiva about the issue and he agreed.
In order to sign from derived keys we need
hmac-sha1 algorithm (with the namespace
http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
to be supported in WSS4J. What should we do now?
When can we commit what we have done up to
now?
Thanks,
Ruchith, Kaushalye, Dimuthu.
"one line" solutions [Re: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Dimuthu,
>
>FYI - http://benjaminm.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=cd6b79f4-301a-4c39-bccb-178af1e5ee80
>
>
>
"one line" solutions - they look good and are perfect under one
condition if they work _always_ otherwise you need mroe support in
runtime to deal with "leaky abstractions"
i always wondered what is the best way to support problem resolution in
such case.
in other words: how to do tracing/debugging such distributed systems
when such fundamental chnage can be done by just tweaking one
configuration parameter ...
alek
>-- dims
>
>On Thu, 27 May 2004 03:54:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>#1: New versions of the specs are already out -
>>http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/Collateral.asp?CID=59565&ID=4714
>>
>>#2: WSE 2.0 Final is out as well -
>>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=FC5F06C5-821F-41D3-A4FE-6C7B56423841&displaylang=en
>>
>>WSE 2.0 Final implements the updated WS-Trust and
>>WS-SecureConversation specs (#1). So please don't code to the old
>>spec. Let's use the new spec.
>>
>>thanks,
>>dims
>>
>>PS: Please send emails directly to the mailing list. thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Dimuthu Leelarathne. <mu...@opensource.lk>
>>Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:04:24 +0600
>>Subject: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
>>To: dims@yahoo.com
>>
>>Hi Dims,
>>
>>We decided to continue coding according to the
>>current specification, and later adapt to the changes in the new specification.
>>We talked to Dr.Sanjiva about the issue and he agreed.
>>
>>In order to sign from derived keys we need
>>hmac-sha1 algorithm (with the namespace
>>http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
>>to be supported in WSS4J. What should we do now?
>>
>>When can we commit what we have done up to
>>now?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ruchith, Kaushalye, Dimuthu.
>>
>>
>>
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
Re: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Dimuthu,
FYI - http://benjaminm.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=cd6b79f4-301a-4c39-bccb-178af1e5ee80
-- dims
On Thu, 27 May 2004 03:54:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> #1: New versions of the specs are already out -
> http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/Collateral.asp?CID=59565&ID=4714
>
> #2: WSE 2.0 Final is out as well -
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=FC5F06C5-821F-41D3-A4FE-6C7B56423841&displaylang=en
>
> WSE 2.0 Final implements the updated WS-Trust and
> WS-SecureConversation specs (#1). So please don't code to the old
> spec. Let's use the new spec.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> PS: Please send emails directly to the mailing list. thanks.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dimuthu Leelarathne. <mu...@opensource.lk>
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:04:24 +0600
> Subject: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
> To: dims@yahoo.com
>
> Hi Dims,
>
> We decided to continue coding according to the
> current specification, and later adapt to the changes in the new specification.
> We talked to Dr.Sanjiva about the issue and he agreed.
>
> In order to sign from derived keys we need
> hmac-sha1 algorithm (with the namespace
> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
> to be supported in WSS4J. What should we do now?
>
> When can we commit what we have done up to
> now?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith, Kaushalye, Dimuthu.
>