You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> on 2013/03/31 16:19:31 UTC
[REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Dear community,
This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
Please follow the release procedure:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
Thanks,
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Thanks everyone. Binaries moved into our dist dir in preparation for the
release.
On 31 March 2013 15:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>
> Please follow the release procedure:
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>
> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> NS
>
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Mike West <mw...@data.io>.
Thanks Dave...+1 on Windows 2012 Server!
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
>
> Test notes are here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>
>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>
>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> NS
>>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
Thanks Jan, and fixed.
Thanks Mike and Nick for helping out. I plan to merge my build scripts back
into the codebase soon, and I'd love some help checking that in & making it
work. I'll let you know when I get started!
On 2 April 2013 13:18, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> The R15 one is missing an .asc file.
>
> Jan
> --
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 23:17 , Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
>
> > The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
> >
> > Test notes are here:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear community,
> >>
> >> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >>
> >> Please follow the release procedure:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >>
> >> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >>
>
>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
The R15 one is missing an .asc file.
Jan
--
On Apr 1, 2013, at 23:17 , Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
>
> Test notes are here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>
>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>
>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> NS
>>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
setup-couchdb-1.3.0_R15B03-1.exe
Win2K3 x86: ok
Win2K3 x64: ok
Win2008 R2 x64 : ok
upgrade from 1.1.1: ok
upgrade from 1.2.0: ok
tests: ok
sigs: ok
hashes: ok
+1
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Both binaries, tested on Win8.
>
> Sigs: OK
> Tests: OK
>
> +1
>
> Jan
> --
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 23:17 , Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
>
>> The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
>>
>> Test notes are here:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear community,
>>>
>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>>
>>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>>
>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> NS
>>>
>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
Both binaries, tested on Win8.
Sigs: OK
Tests: OK
+1
Jan
--
On Apr 1, 2013, at 23:17 , Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
>
> Test notes are here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>
>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>
>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> NS
>>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Nick North <no...@gmail.com>.
Thanks as always Dave. +1 for R15B03 on Windows 2008 R2 SP1. There was one
odd bit of behaviour: running Verify Installation hung first time, but was
fine after stopping and restarting the service, and has been fine since.
Nick
On 1 April 2013 22:17, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
>
> Test notes are here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Dear community,
> >
> > This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >
> > Please follow the release procedure:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >
> > Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > NS
> >
>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
The Easter Bunny left 2 binary eggs this time:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.3.0/rc.3/
Test notes are here:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing
Thanks!
On 31 March 2013 16:19, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>
> Please follow the release procedure:
>
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>
> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> NS
>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Okay, thanks for the explanation. That's fine! :)
On 16 April 2013 15:08, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> It is a user experience nightmare.
>
> Steps to intall a zip app:
>
> 1. Download
> 2. Double Click (in Safari downloads, in the downloads springload in the
> Dock or in the Finder)
> 3. Double Click the resulting .app.
>
> Steps to install a dmg app:
>
> 1. Download
> 2. (if automount is enabled), navigate to a Finder with a sidebar. (if
> not, double click)
> 3. Open the mounted disk image.
> 4. copy/move the app to /Applications or whereever // insert rant about
> sidebar-less Finder window configuration.
> 5. Eject the dmg.
>
> If at 4, people just open the app, they can’t unmount the image (5) and
> the app is trapped there forever. On top of that, why add a confusing layer
> of complexity for no good reason?
>
> The .dmg is a horrible cargo-cult from the early days of the Mac’s history
> and has been discouraged for a very long time (let it be 2004). I’m happy
> to dig up a few old articles that discuss this in more detail, but I hope
> this suffices.
>
> tl;dr: no benefits, horrible user experience, lets not cargo-cult.
>
>
> Best
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 15:32 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Any reason, Bob? I'm trying to understand what the facts are. Without
> > knowing what the pros and cons are, I am unable to hold any opinion on
> the
> > subject. All I know is that every app I ever download for OS X comes
> with a
> > .dmg. CouchDB is the only app I have downloaded on my current laptop that
> > expands from a .zip file. That's enough to make me question our choice.
> But
> > I really don't have any other information on the subject.
> >
> >
> > On 16 April 2013 14:28, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for keeping .zip.
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >> On 16 April 2013 14:26, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Any reason?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 16 April 2013 14:21, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 14:36 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly
> >> not
> >>>>> have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip
> >> file
> >>>>> might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
> >>>>
> >>>> No.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jan,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In this directory:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when
> >>>> updating
> >>>>>>> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
> >>>>>>> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with
> >> the
> >>>>>>> version number in it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead
> >> with
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
> >>>>>>> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and
> >> then
> >>>>>>> update the website links.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in
> them,
> >>>> but
> >>>>>> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but
> the
> >>>>>> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in
> >>>> line
> >>>>>> with Mac system standards.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best
> >>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This
> >>>> whole
> >>>>>>>> thing
> >>>>>>>> needs cleaning up.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The preliminary binaries are up on
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> To test:
> >>>>>>>> - download
> >>>>>>>> - verify signatures*
> >>>>>>>> - unzip
> >>>>>>>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
> >>>>>>>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
> >>>>>>>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
> >>>>>>>> - click on “Verify Installation”
> >>>>>>>> - if all is green, all is well.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> * verify signatures:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
> >>>>>>>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
> >>>>>>>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I’m currently blocked by
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> cc Jason
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3
> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> NS
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> NS
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
It is a user experience nightmare.
Steps to intall a zip app:
1. Download
2. Double Click (in Safari downloads, in the downloads springload in the Dock or in the Finder)
3. Double Click the resulting .app.
Steps to install a dmg app:
1. Download
2. (if automount is enabled), navigate to a Finder with a sidebar. (if not, double click)
3. Open the mounted disk image.
4. copy/move the app to /Applications or whereever // insert rant about sidebar-less Finder window configuration.
5. Eject the dmg.
If at 4, people just open the app, they can’t unmount the image (5) and the app is trapped there forever. On top of that, why add a confusing layer of complexity for no good reason?
The .dmg is a horrible cargo-cult from the early days of the Mac’s history and has been discouraged for a very long time (let it be 2004). I’m happy to dig up a few old articles that discuss this in more detail, but I hope this suffices.
tl;dr: no benefits, horrible user experience, lets not cargo-cult.
Best
Jan
--
On Apr 16, 2013, at 15:32 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Any reason, Bob? I'm trying to understand what the facts are. Without
> knowing what the pros and cons are, I am unable to hold any opinion on the
> subject. All I know is that every app I ever download for OS X comes with a
> .dmg. CouchDB is the only app I have downloaded on my current laptop that
> expands from a .zip file. That's enough to make me question our choice. But
> I really don't have any other information on the subject.
>
>
> On 16 April 2013 14:28, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 for keeping .zip.
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On 16 April 2013 14:26, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Any reason?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2013 14:21, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 14:36 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly
>> not
>>>>> have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip
>> file
>>>>> might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this directory:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when
>>>> updating
>>>>>>> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
>>>>>>> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with
>> the
>>>>>>> version number in it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead
>> with
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
>>>>>>> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and
>> then
>>>>>>> update the website links.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them,
>>>> but
>>>>>> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
>>>>>> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in
>>>> line
>>>>>> with Mac system standards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This
>>>> whole
>>>>>>>> thing
>>>>>>>> needs cleaning up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The preliminary binaries are up on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To test:
>>>>>>>> - download
>>>>>>>> - verify signatures*
>>>>>>>> - unzip
>>>>>>>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
>>>>>>>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
>>>>>>>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
>>>>>>>> - click on “Verify Installation”
>>>>>>>> - if all is green, all is well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> * verify signatures:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
>>>>>>>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
>>>>>>>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I’m currently blocked by
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cc Jason
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> NS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> NS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Any reason, Bob? I'm trying to understand what the facts are. Without
knowing what the pros and cons are, I am unable to hold any opinion on the
subject. All I know is that every app I ever download for OS X comes with a
.dmg. CouchDB is the only app I have downloaded on my current laptop that
expands from a .zip file. That's enough to make me question our choice. But
I really don't have any other information on the subject.
On 16 April 2013 14:28, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for keeping .zip.
>
> B.
>
> On 16 April 2013 14:26, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Any reason?
> >
> >
> > On 16 April 2013 14:21, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 16, 2013, at 14:36 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly
> not
> >> > have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip
> file
> >> > might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
> >>
> >> No.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Jan,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> In this directory:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when
> >> updating
> >> >>> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
> >> >>> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with
> the
> >> >>> version number in it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead
> with
> >> >> the
> >> >>> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
> >> >>> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and
> then
> >> >>> update the website links.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them,
> >> but
> >> >> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
> >> >> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in
> >> line
> >> >> with Mac system standards.
> >> >>
> >> >> Best
> >> >> Jan
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This
> >> whole
> >> >>>> thing
> >> >>>> needs cleaning up.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The preliminary binaries are up on
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> To test:
> >> >>>> - download
> >> >>>> - verify signatures*
> >> >>>> - unzip
> >> >>>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
> >> >>>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
> >> >>>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
> >> >>>> - click on “Verify Installation”
> >> >>>> - if all is green, all is well.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thanks!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Jan
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> * verify signatures:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
> >> >>>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
> >> >>>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> I’m currently blocked by
> >> >>>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> cc Jason
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Jan
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Dear community,
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> NS
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> NS
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > NS
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org>.
+1 for keeping .zip.
B.
On 16 April 2013 14:26, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Any reason?
>
>
> On 16 April 2013 14:21, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 14:36 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly not
>> > have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip file
>> > might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Jan,
>> >>>
>> >>> In this directory:
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
>> >>>
>> >>> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when
>> updating
>> >>> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
>> >>> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with the
>> >>> version number in it.
>> >>>
>> >>> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead with
>> >> the
>> >>> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
>> >>> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and then
>> >>> update the website links.
>> >>
>> >> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them,
>> but
>> >> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
>> >> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in
>> line
>> >> with Mac system standards.
>> >>
>> >> Best
>> >> Jan
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This
>> whole
>> >>>> thing
>> >>>> needs cleaning up.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The preliminary binaries are up on
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> To test:
>> >>>> - download
>> >>>> - verify signatures*
>> >>>> - unzip
>> >>>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
>> >>>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
>> >>>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
>> >>>> - click on “Verify Installation”
>> >>>> - if all is green, all is well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Jan
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> * verify signatures:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
>> >>>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
>> >>>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I’m currently blocked by
>> >>>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> cc Jason
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jan
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Dear community,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> NS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> NS
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > NS
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Any reason?
On 16 April 2013 14:21, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 14:36 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly not
> > have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip file
> > might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
>
> No.
>
> >
> >
> > On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jan,
> >>>
> >>> In this directory:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
> >>>
> >>> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when
> updating
> >>> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
> >>> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with the
> >>> version number in it.
> >>>
> >>> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead with
> >> the
> >>> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
> >>> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and then
> >>> update the website links.
> >>
> >> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them,
> but
> >> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
> >> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in
> line
> >> with Mac system standards.
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Jan
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This
> whole
> >>>> thing
> >>>> needs cleaning up.
> >>>>
> >>>> The preliminary binaries are up on
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
> >>>>
> >>>> To test:
> >>>> - download
> >>>> - verify signatures*
> >>>> - unzip
> >>>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
> >>>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
> >>>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
> >>>> - click on “Verify Installation”
> >>>> - if all is green, all is well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan
> >>>> --
> >>>> * verify signatures:
> >>>>
> >>>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
> >>>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
> >>>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I’m currently blocked by
> >>>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
> >>>>>
> >>>>> cc Jason
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jan
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Dear community,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> NS
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> NS
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On Apr 16, 2013, at 14:36 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly not
> have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip file
> might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
No.
>
>
> On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Jan,
>>>
>>> In this directory:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
>>>
>>> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when updating
>>> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
>>> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with the
>>> version number in it.
>>>
>>> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead with
>> the
>>> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
>>> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and then
>>> update the website links.
>>
>> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them, but
>> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
>> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in line
>> with Mac system standards.
>>
>> Best
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole
>>>> thing
>>>> needs cleaning up.
>>>>
>>>> The preliminary binaries are up on
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>>>>
>>>> To test:
>>>> - download
>>>> - verify signatures*
>>>> - unzip
>>>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
>>>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
>>>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
>>>> - click on “Verify Installation”
>>>> - if all is green, all is well.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>> --
>>>> * verify signatures:
>>>>
>>>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
>>>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
>>>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I’m currently blocked by
>>>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
>>>>>
>>>>> cc Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> NS
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> NS
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Hmm. You raise an interesting point. The .app file should certainly not
have version numbers in it. But it seems conceivable that the .zip file
might. Do we ever plan to use a .dmg file instead of .zip?
On 15 April 2013 19:34, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Jan,
> >
> > In this directory:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
> >
> > The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when updating
> > the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
> > pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with the
> > version number in it.
> >
> > However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead with
> the
> > release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
> > filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and then
> > update the website links.
>
> I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them, but
> I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
> resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in line
> with Mac system standards.
>
> Best
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole
> >> thing
> >> needs cleaning up.
> >>
> >> The preliminary binaries are up on
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
> >>
> >> To test:
> >> - download
> >> - verify signatures*
> >> - unzip
> >> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
> >> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
> >> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
> >> - click on “Verify Installation”
> >> - if all is green, all is well.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Jan
> >> --
> >> * verify signatures:
> >>
> >> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
> >> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
> >> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’m currently blocked by
> >> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
> >>>
> >>> cc Jason
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dear community,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please follow the release procedure:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >>>>
> >>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> NS
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On Apr 9, 2013, at 18:38 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Jan,
>
> In this directory:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
>
> The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when updating
> the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
> pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with the
> version number in it.
>
> However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead with the
> release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
> filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and then
> update the website links.
I don’t think the file names should have the release version in them, but
I can be persuaded to do it for the Apache-CouchDB-x.y.z.zip, but the
resulting .app should always be called “Apache CouchDB.app” to be in line
with Mac system standards.
Best
Jan
--
>
>
>
>
> On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole
>> thing
>> needs cleaning up.
>>
>> The preliminary binaries are up on
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>>
>> To test:
>> - download
>> - verify signatures*
>> - unzip
>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
>> - click on “Verify Installation”
>> - if all is green, all is well.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Jan
>> --
>> * verify signatures:
>>
>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m currently blocked by
>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
>>>
>>> cc Jason
>>>
>>> Jan
>>> --
>>>
>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear community,
>>>>
>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>>>
>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>>>
>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> NS
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Jan,
In this directory:
http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/
The binaries lack a "1.3.0" in the filename. I noticed this when updating
the links on our website, because they broke, with the new filename
pattern. I think it would be good to standardise on a filename with the
version number in it.
However, because these are convenience binaries, I am going ahead with the
release announcement. If you roll some new binaries with an updated
filename, just wait the usual 24 hours for the mirrors to sync and then
update the website links.
On 1 April 2013 14:49, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole
> thing
> needs cleaning up.
>
> The preliminary binaries are up on
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>
> To test:
> - download
> - verify signatures*
> - unzip
> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
> - click on “Verify Installation”
> - if all is green, all is well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jan
> --
> * verify signatures:
>
> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I’m currently blocked by
> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
> >
> > cc Jason
> >
> > Jan
> > --
> >
> > On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear community,
> >>
> >> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >>
> >> Please follow the release procedure:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >>
> >> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On Apr 1, 2013, at 17:25 , Ryan Ramage <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not sure if we vote on these, but +1, works for me. Thanks Jan!
We do not officially vote on binaries, but casting a +1 as a vote of confidence for shipping this is welcome :)
Thanks Ryan!
Jan
--
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole
>> thing
>> needs cleaning up.
>>
>> The preliminary binaries are up on
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>>
>> To test:
>> - download
>> - verify signatures*
>> - unzip
>> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
>> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
>> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
>> - click on “Verify Installation”
>> - if all is green, all is well.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Jan
>> --
>> * verify signatures:
>>
>> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
>> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
>> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m currently blocked by
>> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
>>>
>>> cc Jason
>>>
>>> Jan
>>> --
>>>
>>> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear community,
>>>>
>>>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>>>
>>>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>>>
>>>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> NS
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Ryan Ramage <ry...@gmail.com>.
Not sure if we vote on these, but +1, works for me. Thanks Jan!
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole
> thing
> needs cleaning up.
>
> The preliminary binaries are up on
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
>
> To test:
> - download
> - verify signatures*
> - unzip
> - double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
> - wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
> - navigate to “Verify Installation”
> - click on “Verify Installation”
> - if all is green, all is well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jan
> --
> * verify signatures:
>
> md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
> sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
> gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I’m currently blocked by
> https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
> >
> > cc Jason
> >
> > Jan
> > --
> >
> > On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear community,
> >>
> >> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
> >>
> >> Please follow the release procedure:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
> >>
> >> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >
>
>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
I managed to work around some of the issues in an ad-hoc way. This whole thing
needs cleaning up.
The preliminary binaries are up on
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/1.3.0/rc.3/
To test:
- download
- verify signatures*
- unzip
- double click (make sure no other couch is running on 5984
- wait for Futon to auto-open in your browser
- navigate to “Verify Installation”
- click on “Verify Installation”
- if all is green, all is well.
Thanks!
Jan
--
* verify signatures:
md5sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.md5
sha1sum --check Apache-CouchDB.zip.sha
gpg --verify Apache-CouchDB.zip.asc
On Apr 1, 2013, at 13:25 , Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I’m currently blocked by https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
>
> cc Jason
>
> Jan
> --
>
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>>
>> Please follow the release procedure:
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>>
>> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> NS
>
Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
I’m currently blocked by https://github.com/iriscouch/build-couchdb/issues/77
cc Jason
Jan
--
On Mar 31, 2013, at 16:19 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.3.0-rc.3 release.
>
> Please follow the release procedure:
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure#Preparing_the_Binary_Packages
>
> Everyone is welcome to prepare binaries for this release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> NS