You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Postol <ft...@centrum.cz> on 2009/03/17 19:29:21 UTC
Which types to use - org.apache.activemq namespace or javax.jms
namespace
Hello All,
maybe it is a stupid question, but I am little bit confused, which objects
should be used, when I am developing clients, which will communicate with
ActiveMQ broker.
I am not sure if I should use types from org.apache.activemq namespace or
from javax.jms namespace.
I know, that javax.jms namespace is original jms implementation and am not
sure what happens if I use types from org.apache.activemq namespace (eg.
ActiveMQSession, ActiveMQQueue, ActiveMQTopicPublisher etc.).
Which one should I use in client implementation?
Is there any difference? I can see that types from org.apache.activemq
namespace have more members and methods that ones from javax.jms namespace.
Is it correct and safe to use all types from org.apache.activemq namespace?
Thanks and regards,
Postol
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-types-to-use---org.apache.activemq-namespace-or-javax.jms-namespace-tp22565163p22565163.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Which types to use - org.apache.activemq namespace or javax.jms
namespace
Posted by Postol <ft...@centrum.cz>.
Sorry for that stupid question:) - it is clear now.
Postol wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> maybe it is a stupid question, but I am little bit confused, which objects
> should be used, when I am developing clients, which will communicate with
> ActiveMQ broker.
>
> I am not sure if I should use types from org.apache.activemq namespace or
> from javax.jms namespace.
>
> I know, that javax.jms namespace is original jms implementation and am not
> sure what happens if I use types from org.apache.activemq namespace (eg.
> ActiveMQSession, ActiveMQQueue, ActiveMQTopicPublisher etc.).
>
> Which one should I use in client implementation?
>
> Is there any difference? I can see that types from org.apache.activemq
> namespace have more members and methods that ones from javax.jms
> namespace. Is it correct and safe to use all types from
> org.apache.activemq namespace?
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Postol
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-types-to-use---org.apache.activemq-namespace-or-javax.jms-namespace-tp22565163p22586154.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.