You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2014/02/18 14:47:53 UTC
Flip to git...
We seem to have had consensus to flip to git after the milestone2 release. Now that that is out, I’m going to start that process. It may take a few days as we need to run a bunch of commands on the current repo to clean it out and then I have to work with infra to get it moved over and such. However, I don’t want to stop development momentum.
For now, can we NOT merge anything back onto the fixes branches? Just keep committing to trunk. After the new repo goes live, we can pull/cherry-pick any “new” things from the old trunk location and then merge them back to various branches. That should make it a bit easier as there will only be a single branch to worry about re-syncing after the switch.
Thanks!
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
RE: Flip to git...
Posted by Oliver Wulff <ow...@talend.com>.
I'm fine with the move of fediz to git
Thanks
Oli
________________________________________
From: Christian Schneider [cschneider111@gmail.com] on behalf of Christian Schneider [chris@die-schneider.net]
Sent: 19 February 2014 21:36
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flip to git...
I am fine with the move to git for dosgi.
Christian
Am 19.02.2014 03:53, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> Just as an FYI:
>
> I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7348 so the ball is now rolling in INFRA’s hands.
>
> While filing that, I realized we haven’t talked about the other 4 sub projects: buildutils, xjc-utils, fediz, and dosgi. We have git mirrors for dosgi and fediz so we could flip those over quickly if we wanted to. buildutils and xjc-utils would be a bit more involved as we’d have to create the mirrors.
>
> Does anyone have any reasons NOT to migrate everything over? Would the folks working on fedix/dosgi prefer to stay SVN or move over to git?
>
> Dan
>
>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: Flip to git...
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
I am fine with the move to git for dosgi.
Christian
Am 19.02.2014 03:53, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> Just as an FYI:
>
> I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7348 so the ball is now rolling in INFRA’s hands.
>
> While filing that, I realized we haven’t talked about the other 4 sub projects: buildutils, xjc-utils, fediz, and dosgi. We have git mirrors for dosgi and fediz so we could flip those over quickly if we wanted to. buildutils and xjc-utils would be a bit more involved as we’d have to create the mirrors.
>
> Does anyone have any reasons NOT to migrate everything over? Would the folks working on fedix/dosgi prefer to stay SVN or move over to git?
>
> Dan
>
>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: Flip to git...
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
Does anyone have a reason to drive a horse and cart instead of a car? ;-)
j/k
Thanks for getting this together... this is a big move for our community.
Jeff
> Daniel Kulp <ma...@apache.org>
> February 18, 2014 at 7:53 PM
> Just as an FYI:
>
> I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7348 so the ball
> is now rolling in INFRA’s hands.
>
> While filing that, I realized we haven’t talked about the other 4 sub
> projects: buildutils, xjc-utils, fediz, and dosgi. We have git mirrors
> for dosgi and fediz so we could flip those over quickly if we wanted
> to. buildutils and xjc-utils would be a bit more involved as we’d have
> to create the mirrors.
>
> Does anyone have any reasons NOT to migrate everything over? Would the
> folks working on fedix/dosgi prefer to stay SVN or move over to git?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Kulp <ma...@apache.org>
> February 18, 2014 at 6:47 AM
> We seem to have had consensus to flip to git after the milestone2
> release. Now that that is out, I’m going to start that process. It may
> take a few days as we need to run a bunch of commands on the current
> repo to clean it out and then I have to work with infra to get it
> moved over and such. However, I don’t want to stop development momentum.
>
> For now, can we NOT merge anything back onto the fixes branches? Just
> keep committing to trunk. After the new repo goes live, we can
> pull/cherry-pick any “new” things from the old trunk location and then
> merge them back to various branches. That should make it a bit easier
> as there will only be a single branch to worry about re-syncing after
> the switch.
>
> Thanks!
>
Re: Flip to git...
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Just as an FYI:
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7348 so the ball is now rolling in INFRA’s hands.
While filing that, I realized we haven’t talked about the other 4 sub projects: buildutils, xjc-utils, fediz, and dosgi. We have git mirrors for dosgi and fediz so we could flip those over quickly if we wanted to. buildutils and xjc-utils would be a bit more involved as we’d have to create the mirrors.
Does anyone have any reasons NOT to migrate everything over? Would the folks working on fedix/dosgi prefer to stay SVN or move over to git?
Dan
On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> We seem to have had consensus to flip to git after the milestone2 release. Now that that is out, I’m going to start that process. It may take a few days as we need to run a bunch of commands on the current repo to clean it out and then I have to work with infra to get it moved over and such. However, I don’t want to stop development momentum.
>
> For now, can we NOT merge anything back onto the fixes branches? Just keep committing to trunk. After the new repo goes live, we can pull/cherry-pick any “new” things from the old trunk location and then merge them back to various branches. That should make it a bit easier as there will only be a single branch to worry about re-syncing after the switch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com