You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> on 2015/02/03 17:20:30 UTC
[VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
The vote passes with:
[8] +1 (claus, jim, tim, dejan, hiram, hadrian, rob, gary)
[0] -1
non-binding
[3] +1 (krzysxtof, robbie, dan)
I will proceed to publish etc.
Thanks to everyone who contributed and to those who took the time to vote.
Gary.
On 30 January 2015 at 14:00, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
>
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards,
> Gary.
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Posted by Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com>.
On 02/04/2015 12:10 PM, artnaseef wrote:
> Hey - any thoughts on the length of votes? Did I misunderstand?
Vote went out on the 30th in the morning and ended on the 3rd in the
morning which meets the 72hr windows Gary set in the initial vote thread.
>
> By the way - my tests finally finished - after 17:42! almost 18 hours! Who
> said they take 5 hours, or even 10?
>
> There were a few failures, but they all passed on the second try - except
> the karaf test that failed because my system was using ports 61616 and 1099.
> That one passed after freeing those ports.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RESULT-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690937p4691059.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.bish@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Posted by artnaseef <ar...@artnaseef.com>.
Ah, thanks James. I heard business days once-upon-a time. My mistake.
OpenSource never rests! ;-).
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RESULT-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690937p4691069.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
I think the misunderstanding is the 72 "business hours" here. I don't
know that I've ever heard that stipulation. I've always just heard it
as 72 hours, and this vote satisfies that.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:10 PM, artnaseef <ar...@artnaseef.com> wrote:
> Hey - any thoughts on the length of votes? Did I misunderstand?
>
> By the way - my tests finally finished - after 17:42! almost 18 hours! Who
> said they take 5 hours, or even 10?
>
> There were a few failures, but they all passed on the second try - except
> the karaf test that failed because my system was using ports 61616 and 1099.
> That one passed after freeing those ports.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RESULT-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690937p4691059.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
The vote seemed to run from 1/30 to 2/3. Three full days in there (1/31,
2/1, 2/2)
On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 12:17:18 PM artnaseef <ar...@artnaseef.com> wrote:
> Hey - any thoughts on the length of votes? Did I misunderstand?
>
> By the way - my tests finally finished - after 17:42! almost 18 hours!
> Who
> said they take 5 hours, or even 10?
>
> There were a few failures, but they all passed on the second try - except
> the karaf test that failed because my system was using ports 61616 and
> 1099.
> That one passed after freeing those ports.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/VOTE-RESULT-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690937p4691059.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Posted by artnaseef <ar...@artnaseef.com>.
Hey - any thoughts on the length of votes? Did I misunderstand?
By the way - my tests finally finished - after 17:42! almost 18 hours! Who
said they take 5 hours, or even 10?
There were a few failures, but they all passed on the second try - except
the karaf test that failed because my system was using ports 61616 and 1099.
That one passed after freeing those ports.
Cheers.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RESULT-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690937p4691059.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Posted by artnaseef <ar...@artnaseef.com>.
Hey Gary - isn't that a short vote? I understood votes are 72 business hours
by default?
Note that I am still running the tests after starting them last night. With
that said, I don't anticipate any issues.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RESULT-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690937p4690945.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.