Re: TCK issue

[Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com>]

Excellent :). I see you opened 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-116 for this. We'll get it 
fixed!

Cheers,

--Kurt


On 6/25/11 7:45 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Hi Kurt,   you are right,   the problem is within  scout 1.2.2 instead 
> of UDDI.
>
> org.apache.ws.scout.transport.AxisTransport.send(Element, URI)
>
> {
>
> ...
> try {
>       service = new Service();
>       call = (Call)service.createCall();
>       call.setTargetEndpointAddress(endpointURL.toURL());
>
>       String requestString = XMLUtils.ElementToString(request);
>       SOAPBodyElement body = new SOAPBodyElement(new 
> ByteArrayInputStream(requestString.getBytes("UTF-8")));
>       Object[] soapBodies = new Object[] { body };
>
>       Vector *result *= (Vector)call.invoke(soapBodies);
>       response = ((SOAPBodyElement)*result.elementAt(0)*).getAsDOM();
>     }
>
> ...
>
> }
>
> After the change in JUDDI-498, now the *result *of these void server 
> call is an empty Vector,   so that*result.elementAt(0)* will result in 
> IndexOutOfBoundsException.
>
> All these void related call will have the same failure.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com 
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Kurt,
>
>     Just a guess because it's a regression since June.10th.    I just
>     tried to revert to the uddi revision before June.10th.    The
>     problem is still there.
>
>     I confirm it's not an issue of 3.1.0 release.
>
>
>     On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Kurt T Stam <kurt.stam@gmail.com
>     <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Shawn,
>
>         JUDDI-498 fixes how it is supposed to work in the UDDIv3 spec:
>         an empty message on success. It maybe that something needs to
>         change on the scout side for this, but I don't think it is a
>         jUDDI issue.
>
>         --Kurt
>
>         On 6/23/11 10:49 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>         Got some tck regressions comparing to the revison on
>>         June.10.   Guess it's caused by following changes.
>>
>>         JUDDI-498, fixing so it returns an empty response (again, I
>>         think something got changed accidentally)
>>
>>         https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/juddi/trunk@1137035
>>
>>         On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kurt T Stam
>>         <kurt.stam@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi guys,
>>
>>             This is our 2nd attempt.
>>
>>             We have a tag at:
>>
>>             tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/juddi/tags/juddi-3.1.0
>>
>>             the release artifacts are staged at:
>>
>>             https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejuddi-043/
>>
>>             and the distribution is staged at:
>>
>>             http://people.apache.org/~kstam/releases/juddi-3.1.0/mirror/
>>             <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekstam/releases/juddi-3.1.0/mirror/>
>>
>>             Please give it a spin and cast your vote in the next 72
>>             hours!
>>
>>             My vote: +1
>>
>>             Cheers,
>>
>>             --Kurt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Shawn
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Shawn
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Shawn