You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/14 15:10:21 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (WICKET-6201) PropertyResolver.setValue failing
if there is only setter
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15377090#comment-15377090 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on WICKET-6201:
----------------------------------------
Github user PhantomYdn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/74
Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6201
Also - it will be very helfull to make getObjectWithGetAndSet public. Sometimes it's usefully to introspect object by wicket utilities. We switched in [Orienteer](http://orienteer.org) from spring bean introspection to wicket due not accurate working with beans in Spring (for example if there is a class with methods like: public String getValue(); public void setValue(Object value) - Spring is failing measurably even if property "value" was not directly requested).
> PropertyResolver.setValue failing if there is only setter
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-6201
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6201
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 7.3.0
> Reporter: Ilia Naryzhny
>
> This issue is related to this PR: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/74#issuecomment-232608673
> Issue:
> If there is a bean like that:
> public class Bean {
> public void setValue(Object value);
> }
> PropertyValue.setValue is failing to set value for "value" expression with message that no "get" methods.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)