You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/14 15:10:21 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (WICKET-6201) PropertyResolver.setValue failing if there is only setter

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15377090#comment-15377090 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on WICKET-6201:
----------------------------------------

Github user PhantomYdn commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/74
  
    Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6201
    
    Also - it will be very helfull to make getObjectWithGetAndSet public. Sometimes it's usefully to introspect object by wicket utilities. We switched in [Orienteer](http://orienteer.org) from spring bean introspection to wicket due not accurate working with beans in Spring (for example if there is a class with methods like: public String getValue(); public void setValue(Object value) - Spring is failing measurably even if property "value" was not directly requested).


> PropertyResolver.setValue failing if  there is only setter
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-6201
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6201
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 7.3.0
>            Reporter: Ilia Naryzhny
>
> This issue is related to this PR: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/74#issuecomment-232608673
> Issue:
> If there is a bean like that:
> public class Bean {
>    public void setValue(Object value);
> }
> PropertyValue.setValue is failing to set value for "value" expression with message that no "get" methods.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)