You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/07/16 12:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-24134) camel-resilience4j / camel-microprofile-fault-tolerance - Circuit Breaker EIP: timed-out task writes results back to the original exchange, racing with fallback processing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-24134:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.22.0
> camel-resilience4j / camel-microprofile-fault-tolerance - Circuit Breaker EIP: timed-out task writes results back to the original exchange, racing with fallback processing
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-24134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24134
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-microprofile-fault-tolerance, eip
> Affects Versions: 4.21.0
> Reporter: Federico Mariani
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.22.0
>
>
> In both Circuit Breaker implementations, the protected processor runs on a correlated copy of the exchange, but the worker thread writes the outcome back to the *original* exchange with no guard against the caller having already moved on after a timeout.
> camel-resilience4j, {{ResilienceProcessor.processTask()}} (the identical pattern exists in {{FaultToleranceProcessor.CircuitBreakerTask.call()}} with SmallRye's thread offload):
> {code:java}
> // handle the processing result
> if (copy.getException() != null) {
> exchange.setException(copy.getException());
> } else {
> // copy the result as its regarded as success
> ExchangeHelper.copyResults(exchange, copy);
> exchange.setProperty(ExchangePropertyKey.CIRCUIT_BREAKER_RESPONSE_SUCCESSFUL_EXECUTION, true);
> ...
> }
> {code}
> When the TimeLimiter (or SmallRye timeout) fires, the calling thread immediately runs the fallback and continues routing on the original exchange. Meanwhile the worker thread - unless it happens to be blocked at an interruptible point, and always when {{timeoutCancelRunningFuture=false}} - eventually completes and executes the write-back above, concurrently mutating the same original exchange:
> * it can overwrite the fallback result with the late result;
> * it can reinstate an exception after the fallback cleared it;
> * {{ExchangeHelper.copyResults}} is not atomic, so body/headers/properties can interleave with the route's own processing.
> The exchange copy only protects against *downstream processors* mutating the exchange during timeout processing (as the code comment says); the write-back path itself is unguarded.
> Suggested fix: the worker must not touch the original exchange once the call has timed out - e.g. a per-task completed/timed-out flag (CAS) checked before the write-back, or perform the write-back on the caller side only when the future completed within the timeout.
> _Filed by Claude Code on behalf of Federico Mariani (fmariani)_
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)