You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/01 04:41:13 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5948) Improve RateLimiters
Initialization semantics
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14229389#comment-14229389 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5948:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1642627 from [~rcmuir] in branch 'dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_10'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1642627 ]
LUCENE-5948: RateLimiter now fully inits itself on init
> Improve RateLimiters Initialization semantics
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5948
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.10.3, 5.0, Trunk
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5948.patch
>
>
> I was working on SOLR-6485 when I realized that the first time pause is called even if we write a lot of bytes pause doesn't work correctly because in SimpleRateLimiter.pause() lastNS is 0 and startNS is always more than targetNS.
> If we remove the following line from TestRateLimiter.testPause() then the test fails -
> {code}
> limiter.pause(2);//init
> {code}
> Should we do one of the following ?
> 1. Initialize lastNS in the ctor {code}lastNS = System.nanoTime();{code}
> 2. Add a method saying start() which does the same
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org