Building HBase RPM

[Ishan Chhabra <ic...@rocketfuel.com>]

Hi,
We do a rpm based deploy to centos servers. HBase till 0.94 used to have a
functional rpm spec and a rpm profile, but looks like it is gone from 0.96
onwards.

Was this removed intentionally? Is there now another way to build rpms?

-- 
*Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.

Re: Building HBase RPM

[Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>]

AFAICT, not yet, but it should arrive with the 0.8.0 release work
(under discussion at the moment).

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at https://github.com/apache/bigtop/blob/master/bigtop.mk :
>
> HBASE_BASE_VERSION=0.94.12
>
> Is 0.96+ RPM supported ?
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe Apache Bigtop has taken over that responsibility for the
>> major part of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem components. Perhaps use what
>> they have? Their gold mine is up at
>> https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/rpm/hbase
>> ,
>> etc.
>>
>> Unclear on reason of removal specifically for HBase though, as
>> HBASE-6145's refactoring removed it arbitrarily, but many other
>> projects have also removed/moved their own packaging spec
>> files/scripts in favour of Bigtop handling that responsibility.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:21 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Do you feel up to creating an RPM spec for 0.96 and later?
>> > If so, I don't think anybody would be opposed to committing into
>> dev-support or something.
>> >
>> > -- Lars
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Ishan Chhabra <ic...@rocketfuel.com>
>> > To: user@hbase.apache.org
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 2:26 PM
>> > Subject: Building HBase RPM
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > We do a rpm based deploy to centos servers. HBase till 0.94 used to have
>> a
>> > functional rpm spec and a rpm profile, but looks like it is gone from
>> 0.96
>> > onwards.
>> >
>> > Was this removed intentionally? Is there now another way to build rpms?
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: Building HBase RPM

[Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>]

Looking at https://github.com/apache/bigtop/blob/master/bigtop.mk :

HBASE_BASE_VERSION=0.94.12

Is 0.96+ RPM supported ?


On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> I believe Apache Bigtop has taken over that responsibility for the
> major part of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem components. Perhaps use what
> they have? Their gold mine is up at
> https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/rpm/hbase
> ,
> etc.
>
> Unclear on reason of removal specifically for HBase though, as
> HBASE-6145's refactoring removed it arbitrarily, but many other
> projects have also removed/moved their own packaging spec
> files/scripts in favour of Bigtop handling that responsibility.
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:21 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Do you feel up to creating an RPM spec for 0.96 and later?
> > If so, I don't think anybody would be opposed to committing into
> dev-support or something.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ishan Chhabra <ic...@rocketfuel.com>
> > To: user@hbase.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 2:26 PM
> > Subject: Building HBase RPM
> >
> > Hi,
> > We do a rpm based deploy to centos servers. HBase till 0.94 used to have
> a
> > functional rpm spec and a rpm profile, but looks like it is gone from
> 0.96
> > onwards.
> >
> > Was this removed intentionally? Is there now another way to build rpms?
> >
> > --
> > *Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: Building HBase RPM

[Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>]

I believe Apache Bigtop has taken over that responsibility for the
major part of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem components. Perhaps use what
they have? Their gold mine is up at
https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/rpm/hbase,
etc.

Unclear on reason of removal specifically for HBase though, as
HBASE-6145's refactoring removed it arbitrarily, but many other
projects have also removed/moved their own packaging spec
files/scripts in favour of Bigtop handling that responsibility.

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:21 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> Do you feel up to creating an RPM spec for 0.96 and later?
> If so, I don't think anybody would be opposed to committing into dev-support or something.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ishan Chhabra <ic...@rocketfuel.com>
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 2:26 PM
> Subject: Building HBase RPM
>
> Hi,
> We do a rpm based deploy to centos servers. HBase till 0.94 used to have a
> functional rpm spec and a rpm profile, but looks like it is gone from 0.96
> onwards.
>
> Was this removed intentionally? Is there now another way to build rpms?
>
> --
> *Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: Building HBase RPM

[lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>]

Do you feel up to creating an RPM spec for 0.96 and later?
If so, I don't think anybody would be opposed to committing into dev-support or something.

-- Lars



----- Original Message -----
From: Ishan Chhabra <ic...@rocketfuel.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 2:26 PM
Subject: Building HBase RPM

Hi,
We do a rpm based deploy to centos servers. HBase till 0.94 used to have a
functional rpm spec and a rpm profile, but looks like it is gone from 0.96
onwards.

Was this removed intentionally? Is there now another way to build rpms?

-- 
*Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.