Re: why would renaming a file lose all of its history?

[kfogel <kf...@collab.net>]

"Robert P. J. Day" <rp...@mindspring.com> writes:
>   a colleague (via e-mail) is claiming that renaming a file in an SVN
> repository causes it to lose all of its history.  i'm pretty sure
> that's not supposed to happen.  is there a common mistake he might be
> making that causes this?  (sorry, that's about as much detail as i can
> supply at the moment.)

He's both right and wrong.

Subversion's renames are not implemented as cleanly as they could be.
See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=898 -- it's a
known issue.  Garrett Rooney and others are actively working on it, do
'svn log http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/fs-atomic-renames'
for more details.

But this does not mean that renames "lose all history" today.  They
don't.  Renames are implemented as a copy and a delete together right
now, and Subversion knows how to trace copy history.  Whether issue
#898 will affect you can't be answered out of context, it just depends
on what sorts of things you're trying to do.

Best,
-Karl

-- 
www.collab.net  <>  CollabNet  |  Distributed Development On Demand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org