You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by Francis Christopher Liu <fr...@rocketmail.com> on 2011/10/31 05:36:33 UTC
Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Hi,
We're interested in deploying Hbase with hadoop .205 in our sandbox
environment. Has anyone tried sizable deployments of hbase with Hadoop
0.20.205? What are your experiences?
Thanks,
Francis
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Jignesh Patel <ji...@gmail.com>.
I am testing Hbase 0.90.4 with Hadoop 0.20.205. But we are no where near to
production.
However I noticed the integration is pretty stable.
-Jignesh
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Francis Christopher Liu <
francisliu@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're interested in deploying Hbase with hadoop .205 in our sandbox
> environment. Has anyone tried sizable deployments of hbase with Hadoop
> 0.20.205? What are your experiences?
>
> Thanks,
> Francis
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jignesh Patel <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stack,
> Just curious, 15 nodes - what type of config it has?
>
Nothing exotic. Its testing. Any out-of-the-ordinary configs I have
you wouldn't want because I'm trying to bring on errors when I'm
testing.
St.Ack
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Jignesh Patel <ji...@gmail.com>.
Stack,
Just curious, 15 nodes - what type of config it has?
-Jignesh
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Francis Liu <fr...@rocketmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the responses.
> >
> > Does .90.4 support .205 out of the box or would it need patches?
> >
> > Also how many nodes did the cluster have?
> >
>
> No need of patches for 0.90.4. My test cluster was 15 nodes.
> St.Ack
>
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Francis Liu <fr...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> Does .90.4 support .205 out of the box or would it need patches?
>
> Also how many nodes did the cluster have?
>
No need of patches for 0.90.4. My test cluster was 15 nodes.
St.Ack
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Francis Liu <fr...@rocketmail.com>.
Thanks for the responses.
Does .90.4 support .205 out of the box or would it need patches?
Also how many nodes did the cluster have?
On Oct 31, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM, David Capwell <dc...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Which version would you guys recommend for .205 hadoop: 0.92, or 0.90.4?
>>
>
> 0.92 is not out yet (Hopefully an RC will go up this week) so that
> leaves you with 0.90.4.
> St.Ack
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM, David Capwell <dc...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Which version would you guys recommend for .205 hadoop: 0.92, or 0.90.4?
>
0.92 is not out yet (Hopefully an RC will go up this week) so that
leaves you with 0.90.4.
St.Ack
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by David Capwell <dc...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Which version would you guys recommend for .205 hadoop: 0.92, or 0.90.4?
On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:23:52AM, Stack wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Francis Christopher Liu
> <fr...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> We're interested in deploying Hbase with hadoop .205 in our sandbox
>> environment. Has anyone tried sizable deployments of hbase with Hadoop
>> 0.20.205? What are your experiences?
>>
>
> I've run it in testing only. Seems fine there.
> St.Ack
Re: Deployments of HBase with Hadoop 0.20.205?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Francis Christopher Liu
<fr...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> We're interested in deploying Hbase with hadoop .205 in our sandbox
> environment. Has anyone tried sizable deployments of hbase with Hadoop
> 0.20.205? What are your experiences?
>
I've run it in testing only. Seems fine there.
St.Ack