You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> on 2013/02/18 06:47:54 UTC
[DISCUSS] Allow specification of different VIF drivers per traffic
type in KVM
Hi,
I'd like to make a change for 4.2, allowing the specification of different
VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM.
I have written up the proposal in Jira and Confluence:
Feature spec:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+specification+of+different+VIF+drivers+per+traffic+type+in+KVM
Jira ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1311
I'm interested to hear any comments. If no comments are forthcoming after
72 hours, or only positive ones, my understanding is that I should go ahead
and start development.
If I'm wrong on that, or missing anything in the feature spec / Jira ticket
above, please let me know.
Thanks,
Dave.
Re: [DISCUSS] Allow specification of different VIF drivers per
traffic type in KVM
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
LGTM
On 2/19/13 11:08 AM, "Chip Childers" <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:47:54PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to make a change for 4.2, allowing the specification of
>>different
>> VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM.
>>
>> I have written up the proposal in Jira and Confluence:
>>
>> Feature spec:
>>
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+specificatio
>>n+of+different+VIF+drivers+per+traffic+type+in+KVM
>>
>> Jira ticket:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1311
>>
>> I'm interested to hear any comments. If no comments are forthcoming
>>after
>> 72 hours, or only positive ones, my understanding is that I should go
>>ahead
>> and start development.
>>
>> If I'm wrong on that, or missing anything in the feature spec / Jira
>>ticket
>> above, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dave.
>
>CC'ing Edison and Wido, as they may have a good take from the KVM
>perspective.
>
>Generally, this sounds good to me.
>
>-chip
Re: [DISCUSS] Allow specification of different VIF drivers per
traffic type in KVM
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:47:54PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make a change for 4.2, allowing the specification of different
> VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM.
>
> I have written up the proposal in Jira and Confluence:
>
> Feature spec:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+specification+of+different+VIF+drivers+per+traffic+type+in+KVM
>
> Jira ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1311
>
> I'm interested to hear any comments. If no comments are forthcoming after
> 72 hours, or only positive ones, my understanding is that I should go ahead
> and start development.
>
> If I'm wrong on that, or missing anything in the feature spec / Jira ticket
> above, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
CC'ing Edison and Wido, as they may have a good take from the KVM
perspective.
Generally, this sounds good to me.
-chip