You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@bookkeeper.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/07/06 06:27:27 UTC

[GitHub] [bookkeeper] Shoothzj opened a new pull request, #3385: Remove microbenchmark module

Shoothzj opened a new pull request, #3385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3385

   ### Motivation
   `microbenchmark` module depends on `jmh-core` which is license by GPLv2. 
   For more informations, See mail list https://lists.apache.org/thread/sp8jf5rxvkzdvl4vy8chcqwkdmppwd6t
   
   ### Changes
   - remove microbenchmark module


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [bookkeeper] kezhenxu94 commented on pull request #3385: Remove microbenchmark module

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
kezhenxu94 commented on PR #3385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3385#issuecomment-1175845080

   Hi, from my understanding, if you didn't include the related binary jars in your binary distribution package and you didn't copy their source codes into your source package, it's OK to have these libs as build time dependencies according to
    https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
   
   > Apache projects may not distribute Category X licensed components, in source or binary form; in ASF source code or in convenience binaries. As with the previous question on platforms, you can rely on the component if its license terms do not affect the Apache product's licensing. For example, using a GPL'ed tool during the build is okay, but including GPL'ed source code is not.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [bookkeeper] dave2wave commented on pull request #3385: Remove microbenchmark module

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
dave2wave commented on PR #3385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3385#issuecomment-1176375923

   Calvin's analysis is correct. As long as the GPL code is used as tooling and is not included in the source the use of GPL is fine.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [bookkeeper] Shoothzj closed pull request #3385: Remove microbenchmark module

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Shoothzj closed pull request #3385: Remove microbenchmark module
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3385


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org