Re: Jmeter Performance using, jmeter-server VS running in the local instance

[kootsoop <ko...@gmail.com>]

What's not clear from the discussion?

We eventually just ran JMeter from the command-line on several different
machines, dumping the results to files.

We then appended all the log files together (I seem to recall we could just
keep opening them all in JMeter and things were pulled together correctly).

The only gotcha is to make sure all the machines have their time
synchronized, otherwise the logs are out-of-synch.



On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, ntrvic [via JMeter] <
ml-node+s512774n5717102h42@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

> Can you provide any more details on what your team did?
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-tp4631144p5717102.html
>  To unsubscribe from Jmeter Performance using, jmeter-server VS running in
> the local instance, click here<http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4631144&code=a29vdHNvb3BAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ2MzExNDR8MjA3NDUzMjY0NQ==>
> .
> NAML<http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>



-- 
Peter J. Kootsookos
West Hartford, CT 06117, USA
Skype: +1-860-269-0080
Home: +1-860-206-7488
Cell:    +1-860-543-5917




--
View this message in context: http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-tp4631144p5717103.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.