You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Paul Elschot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/02 21:07:27 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6276) Add matchCost() api to
TwoPhaseDocIdSetIterator
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-6276:
---------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-6276.patch
Patch of 2 Nov 2015.
This addresses all the above concerns.
It also precomputes positionsCost in SpanOrQuery, weighted by the cost() in the same way as matchCost.
> Add matchCost() api to TwoPhaseDocIdSetIterator
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6276
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-6276-ExactPhraseOnly.patch, LUCENE-6276-NoSpans.patch, LUCENE-6276-NoSpans2.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch
>
>
> We could add a method like TwoPhaseDISI.matchCost() defined as something like estimate of nanoseconds or similar.
> ConjunctionScorer could use this method to sort its 'twoPhaseIterators' array so that cheaper ones are called first. Today it has no idea if one scorer is a simple phrase scorer on a short field vs another that might do some geo calculation or more expensive stuff.
> PhraseScorers could implement this based on index statistics (e.g. totalTermFreq/maxDoc)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org