You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/12 07:15:46 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-14418) Make better SEEK vs SKIP decision with seek hints.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14741902#comment-14741902 ] 

Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-14418 at 9/12/15 5:15 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

0.98 version. In my tests with Phoenix I did not see noticeable improvement, though. So might just close. Doing some more test until then.

(turns out in my schema Phoenix would not use SKIP_SCANs)


was (Author: lhofhansl):
0.98 version. In my tests with Phoenix I did not see noticeable improvement, though. So might just close. Doing some more test until then.

> Make better SEEK vs SKIP decision with seek hints.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14418
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14418
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 0.98.12
>
>         Attachments: 13109.txt, 14418-0.98.txt
>
>
> Continuation of parent.
> We can also do this optimization for seek hints. This would allow filters and coprocessors to be more liberal with seek hints, as seeking when unnecessary is less of perf detriment.
> It's not quite as clear cut, since in order to check, we actually do need to create the seek hint Cell. Then when we actually seek, we need to create it again. Need to test carefully.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)