You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Jason van Zyl <ja...@zenplex.com> on 2002/09/03 03:16:21 UTC

[betwixt] single betwixt descriptor

Hi,

Has anyone else been thinking about trying to make a single betwixt
descriptor for a bean instead of having to have one for each nested
bean?

-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jason@zenplex.com
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [betwixt] single betwixt descriptor

Posted by James Strachan <ja...@yahoo.co.uk>.
From: "Jason van Zyl" <ja...@zenplex.com>
> Hi,
> 
> Has anyone else been thinking about trying to make a single betwixt
> descriptor for a bean instead of having to have one for each nested
> bean?

Great idea! 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [betwixt] single betwixt descriptor

Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 02:16 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Has anyone else been thinking about trying to make a single betwixt
> descriptor for a bean instead of having to have one for each nested
> bean?

sort of :)

i've looked into this kind of thing and IMHO it'll probably get messy. it'
ll be easy to break existing stuff. that was one reason why i was trying 
to get those unit tests for the xml output working. it'd be safer to wait 
until that maven classloader problem is fixed but we should be able to 
pick up any problems with your new code once those tests are running again 
and fix them then.

i was working on some stuff in that body of code (improved cycle 
recognition) but if you want to go for it, i'm happy to back off (since my 
initial approach didn't look like it was going to work).

- robert


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>