You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Ken Gilmer <kg...@gmail.com> on 2012/02/06 05:19:36 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Lightweight HTTP Service version 0.1.4
Karl & Richard,
Karl, I've addressed the issue with the NOTICE file so I think we're
alright there. Richard, was your response an implicit +1? From the
release procedure documentation I need three votes, and I just want to
be sure you've voted positively before I perform the release.
thx,
ken
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on the release if the NOTICE as soon as it is fixed in trunk.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ken Gilmer <kg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for your feedback Richard and Karl. Well, given my luck with
>> exploding stuff in wonderful strange ways, I'd prefer the "fix it in
>> trunk and continue with the given release" route. But, I'm also happy
>> to fix the NOTICE and roll a new release if anyone would prefer me to
>> do that.
>>
>> thx,
>> ken
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>>> On 1/26/12 8:09, Ken Gilmer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The complete bundle includes OSGi classes, but does not list them in the
>>>>>> NOTICE file. It's not clear to me if this is a requirement, since they
>>>>>> OSGi
>>>>>> artifacts themselves don't include a NOTICE, but we generally do include
>>>>>> them in the NOTICE file for the framework JARs.
>>>>>
>>>>> In my memory I'd checked the http-bundle module and followed it but
>>>>> now that I check again I can see that it does in fact include the OSGi
>>>>> classes in the NOTICE. I can add that.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, I noticed that the DEPs file for the complete bundle was the old
>>>>>> format while the core bundle was auto-generated, was there a reason for
>>>>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>>> That is very strange. It took me a bit to figure out what you meant.
>>>>> On my local machine where I did the build the jars both contain the
>>>>> old format (meaning, not auto generated). But when I download the
>>>>> jars from the repo I can see that the complete bundle has the auto
>>>>> generated DEPENDENCIES file. I was under assumption that what I was
>>>>> building locally was what was being sent to the repo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I certainly don't know what's going on...I depend on Karl for
>>>> releasing stuff. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> The DEPs file stuff isn't so important anyway, I only mention for reasons of
>>>> consistency...my real question is about the NOTICE. If others think it isn't
>>>> important, then we are probably good to go.
>>>
>>> I'd say it is up to the Release Manager (i.e., Ken in this case). The
>>> osgi jars don't contain a NOTICE so they don't have to be mentioned. I
>>> guess I just fix it in trunk and go ahead with the release unless it
>>> is easy for you to re-roll at this time. Just let us know what you
>>> want to do...
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -> richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thx
>>>>> ken
>>>>>
>>>>>> -> richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/20/12 0:57, Ken Gilmer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We resolved 3 defects and added 3 features in this release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22Lightweight+HTTP+Service%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are currently no outstanding issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-108/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>>>>>>> signatures:
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Usage:
>>>>>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 108 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karl Pauls
>>> karlpauls@gmail.com
>>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Lightweight HTTP Service version 0.1.4
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 2/5/12 23:19, Ken Gilmer wrote:
> Karl& Richard,
>
> Karl, I've addressed the issue with the NOTICE file so I think we're
> alright there. Richard, was your response an implicit +1? From the
> release procedure documentation I need three votes, and I just want to
> be sure you've voted positively before I perform the release.
There are no implicit votes...I just voted.
-> richard
>
> thx,
> ken
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Karl Pauls<ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 on the release if the NOTICE as soon as it is fixed in trunk.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ken Gilmer<kg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for your feedback Richard and Karl. Well, given my luck with
>>> exploding stuff in wonderful strange ways, I'd prefer the "fix it in
>>> trunk and continue with the given release" route. But, I'm also happy
>>> to fix the NOTICE and roll a new release if anyone would prefer me to
>>> do that.
>>>
>>> thx,
>>> ken
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karl Pauls<ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/26/12 8:09, Ken Gilmer wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> The complete bundle includes OSGi classes, but does not list them in the
>>>>>>> NOTICE file. It's not clear to me if this is a requirement, since they
>>>>>>> OSGi
>>>>>>> artifacts themselves don't include a NOTICE, but we generally do include
>>>>>>> them in the NOTICE file for the framework JARs.
>>>>>> In my memory I'd checked the http-bundle module and followed it but
>>>>>> now that I check again I can see that it does in fact include the OSGi
>>>>>> classes in the NOTICE. I can add that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, I noticed that the DEPs file for the complete bundle was the old
>>>>>>> format while the core bundle was auto-generated, was there a reason for
>>>>>>> this?
>>>>>> That is very strange. It took me a bit to figure out what you meant.
>>>>>> On my local machine where I did the build the jars both contain the
>>>>>> old format (meaning, not auto generated). But when I download the
>>>>>> jars from the repo I can see that the complete bundle has the auto
>>>>>> generated DEPENDENCIES file. I was under assumption that what I was
>>>>>> building locally was what was being sent to the repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I certainly don't know what's going on...I depend on Karl for
>>>>> releasing stuff. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The DEPs file stuff isn't so important anyway, I only mention for reasons of
>>>>> consistency...my real question is about the NOTICE. If others think it isn't
>>>>> important, then we are probably good to go.
>>>> I'd say it is up to the Release Manager (i.e., Ken in this case). The
>>>> osgi jars don't contain a NOTICE so they don't have to be mentioned. I
>>>> guess I just fix it in trunk and go ahead with the release unless it
>>>> is easy for you to re-roll at this time. Just let us know what you
>>>> want to do...
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> -> richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> thx
>>>>>> ken
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -> richard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/20/12 0:57, Ken Gilmer wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We resolved 3 defects and added 3 features in this release:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22Lightweight+HTTP+Service%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are currently no outstanding issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-108/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>>>>>>>> signatures:
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Usage:
>>>>>>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 108 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Karl Pauls
>>>> karlpauls@gmail.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>>>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karl Pauls
>> karlpauls@gmail.com
>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls