[users@httpd] PHP Difference between Apache 1.3.9 and 2.0

[Quentin Bennett <Qu...@infinity.co.nz>]

Hi,

Serving up a file named "mercury.soap", which contains:

<?php [some php code] ?>

works under 1.3.9, but under 2.0 serves up the source code of my file.

Neither version has an AddHandler or AddType for .soap files.

Under 2.0, do I have to explicitly state that .soap should be handled using php, or is there a way of making the <?php tag enough, as in 1.3?

Thanks in advance.

Quentin Bennett
Transport Systems Division
Infinity Solutions 
web http:\\www.infinitysolutions.co.nz
mailto:quentin.bennett@infinity.co.nz
Support Calls: mailto:support.desk@infinity.co.nz
Phone : +64 9 358 9720
Fax : +64 9 309 4142


The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and
intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use 
of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email 
and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

Re: [users@httpd] PHP Difference between Apache 1.3.9 and 2.0

[Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>]

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Quentin Bennett wrote:
> Under 2.0, do I have to explicitly state that .soap should be handled
> using php, or is there a way of making the <?php tag enough, as in 1.3?

The <?php tag is not enough in 1.3 or 2.0.  You must always designate
which files will be parsed.  Now, it is possible that you have 1.3
configured to parse ALL files (which would be a bad idea).

Why do you object to using the correct AddType or AddHandler directives?

Joshua.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] PHP Difference between Apache 1.3.9 and 2.0

[George Schlossnagle <ge...@omniti.com>]

I suspect that something is going on in your 1.3 install that you 
haven't communicated here.  As you describe it, the 2.0 instance is 
behaving correctly.  1.3 should be behaving similarly.

George


On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 06:09 PM, Quentin Bennett wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Serving up a file named "mercury.soap", which contains:
>
> <?php [some php code] ?>
>
> works under 1.3.9, but under 2.0 serves up the source code of my file.
>
> Neither version has an AddHandler or AddType for .soap files.
>
> Under 2.0, do I have to explicitly state that .soap should be handled 
> using php, or is there a way of making the <?php tag enough, as in > 1.3?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Quentin Bennett
> Transport Systems Division
> Infinity Solutions
> web http:\\www.infinitysolutions.co.nz
> mailto:quentin.bennett@infinity.co.nz
> Support Calls: mailto:support.desk@infinity.co.nz
> Phone : +64 9 358 9720
> Fax : +64 9 309 4142
>
>  
>  The information contained in this email is privileged and 
> confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and 
> not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error 
> you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender 
> immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.