Re: Win32 MPM patch

[Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
> I had refactored your patch on trunk so that we no longer name the
> silly function wait_for_many_objects (since it obviously didn't do
> that properly, at least not with any consideration of fairness or
> parallel signals).  Roy's concerns should be addressed.
>

+1 It works. Although not sure why you removed the extra function,
but It's a creative freedom I suppose :)

Regards,
Mladen

Re: Win32 MPM patch

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> I had refactored your patch on trunk so that we no longer name the
>> silly function wait_for_many_objects (since it obviously didn't do
>> that properly, at least not with any consideration of fairness or
>> parallel signals).  Roy's concerns should be addressed.
>>
> 
> +1 It works. Although not sure why you removed the extra function,
> but It's a creative freedom I suppose :)

Well, we could and should probably implement a true mass-event handler
with multiple threads, but using it for this trivial application
seemed like overkill :)

Thanks for the review!

Bill