You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@carbondata.apache.org by "Sangeeta Gulia (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/12/20 05:38:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CARBONDATA-1055) Record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16297910#comment-16297910 ] 

Sangeeta Gulia commented on CARBONDATA-1055:
--------------------------------------------

I have tried it using 1GB data. It is working fine on that. Can you provide more details?

> Record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CARBONDATA-1055
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-1055
>             Project: CarbonData
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: data-query
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>         Environment: 3 node cluster
>            Reporter: Chetan Bhat
>         Attachments: TPCH_query15.rar
>
>   Original Estimate: 504h
>  Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> User creates a table and loads TPCH data into different tables.
> User executes all the select queries and compares the record count and performance of the Carbon queries with parquet queries.
> Actual Issue : Record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15.
> Carbon record count for TPCH query 15 - 71972
> Parquet record count for TPCH query 15 - 72343
> Expected : There should not be record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)