You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@carbondata.apache.org by "Sangeeta Gulia (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/12/20 05:38:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CARBONDATA-1055) Record count mismatch for
Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16297910#comment-16297910 ]
Sangeeta Gulia commented on CARBONDATA-1055:
--------------------------------------------
I have tried it using 1GB data. It is working fine on that. Can you provide more details?
> Record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CARBONDATA-1055
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-1055
> Project: CarbonData
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: data-query
> Affects Versions: 1.1.0
> Environment: 3 node cluster
> Reporter: Chetan Bhat
> Attachments: TPCH_query15.rar
>
> Original Estimate: 504h
> Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> User creates a table and loads TPCH data into different tables.
> User executes all the select queries and compares the record count and performance of the Carbon queries with parquet queries.
> Actual Issue : Record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15.
> Carbon record count for TPCH query 15 - 71972
> Parquet record count for TPCH query 15 - 72343
> Expected : There should not be record count mismatch for Carbon query compared with Parquet for TPCH query 15.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)