You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Mihai Budiu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/12/20 01:13:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-6741) The type of a comparison is nullable when either operand is nullable
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mihai Budiu updated CALCITE-6741:
---------------------------------
Summary: The type of a comparison is nullable when either operand is nullable (was: Incorrect type inference in AbstractTypeCoercion.commonTypeForBinaryComparison)
> The type of a comparison is nullable when either operand is nullable
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-6741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6741
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.38.0
> Reporter: Mihai Budiu
> Assignee: Mihai Budiu
> Priority: Minor
>
> This function converts an expression into another expression which does not have the same type.
> The function convertInToOr has the following JavaDoc:
> {code:java}
> /* Converts "x IN (1, 2, ...)" to "x=1 OR x=2 OR ..." */
> {code}
> This is unsound when x is not nullable and the list contains NULL.
> The "in" expression can never evaluate to NULL in that case, whereas the converted expression can.
> As an example, consider this test case, which is a simplified version of a test from Sql Logic Test:
> {code:sql}
> SELECT CASE WHEN 1 NOT IN ( NULL, COUNT(*) ) THEN 1 END
> {code}
> The plan produced for this query is as follows:
> {code}
> LogicalProject(EXPR$0=[CASE(CAST(AND(null, <>(1, $0))):BOOLEAN NOT NULL, 1, null:INTEGER)]), id = 202
> LogicalAggregate(group=[{}], agg#0=[COUNT()]), id = 200
> LogicalValues(tuples=[[{ 0 }]]), id = 160
> {code}
> Notice that there's a CAST(AND ...): BOOLEAN NOT NULL. Unfortunately the AND expression as written is nullable, so this cast is unsound.
> I am thinking that the correct expansion should use IS_NOT_DISTINCT_FROM instead of EQUALS.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)