You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@jena.apache.org by "jakubklimek (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/12/12 13:23:21 UTC

[I] Better support for JSON-LD Titanium development? [jena]

jakubklimek opened a new issue, #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2128

   ### Version
   
   4.10.0
   
   ### Question
   
   Since Apache Jena chose to use Titanium as the JSON-LD 1.1 implementation, would it be possible to somehow allocate some resources to its development, supporting @filip26? There are issues (https://github.com/filip26/titanium-json-ld/issues/292, https://github.com/filip26/titanium-json-ld/issues/248 and others) preventing proper use of JSON-LD 1.1 in our use cases, and therefore, the use of Apache Jena itself, and it seems that these issues have no priority, probably due to lack of resources.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@jena.apache.org

Re: [I] Better support for JSON-LD Titanium development? [jena]

Posted by "afs (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
afs commented on issue #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2128#issuecomment-1883034176

   Closing question.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@jena.apache.org

Re: [I] Better support for JSON-LD Titanium development? [jena]

Posted by "filip26 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
filip26 commented on issue #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2128#issuecomment-1857794349

   @jakubklimek Thank you for seeking support for Titanium! I was not aware of this.
   
   The fastest way to speed up development is to contribute, to spend your own time. Or if it is not an option for you, then you can become a sponsor or hire some as has been mentioned above.
   
   As for any other open-source project,  contribution is voluntary, and this applies to developers as well as to [commercial]users.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@jena.apache.org

Re: [I] Better support for JSON-LD Titanium development? [jena]

Posted by "kinow (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
kinow commented on issue #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2128#issuecomment-1852177820

   >would it be possible to somehow allocate some resources to its development
   
   I am not sure if we have resources to allocate here. We are all volunteers, some contributors work actively with Jena, so they may have some extra $time to work on features required by employers.
   
   >There are issues (https://github.com/filip26/titanium-json-ld/issues/292, https://github.com/filip26/titanium-json-ld/issues/248 and others) preventing proper use of JSON-LD 1.1 in our use cases, and therefore, the use of Apache Jena itself, and it seems that these issues have no priority, probably due to lack of resources.
   
   If you need that for a project, or for your $work, the best option here could be to hire someone to work on those issues, or maybe try to improve titanium-json-ld.
   
   For me my main use cases involve the Fuseki UI, loading and querying simple ontologies, so I use my spare/volunteer time to focus on these areas. At $work I have very little use of Jena, so my bandwidth to work on Jena is limited -- other contributors/volunteers here might have similar situations.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@jena.apache.org

Re: [I] Better support for JSON-LD Titanium development? [jena]

Posted by "afs (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
afs closed issue #2128: Better support for JSON-LD Titanium development?
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2128


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@jena.apache.org