You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "Thomas Strauß (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/07 14:58:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5238) Add JDBC Persistence for Scheduler

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15555302#comment-15555302 ] 

Thomas Strauß commented on AMQ-5238:
------------------------------------

The situation got worse with the introduction of LevelDB, where you introduce a distributed database with ZooKeeper and explicitely exclude the use of scheduled messages. 

If you research the topic, you may finally stumble on that, but you do this usually when you fell into the trap of using redelivery policies in HA environments. 

It is nowhere clear from the documentation, that the scheduled messages and through the backdoor of redelivery policies, also the messages prepared for redelivery are no longer covered by the HA installation. This should be written explicitely on the redelivery policy documentation page and on basically all pages describing HA setups.



> Add JDBC Persistence for Scheduler
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5238
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5238
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Job Scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 5.9.0
>         Environment: JBoss A-MQ 6.0
>            Reporter: Jason Shepherd
>            Priority: Minor
>
> AMQ-3024 added support for non-KahaDB persistence of scheduled jobs, but a JDBC alternative has yet to be added. 
> If we're using JDBC persistence adapter, we want all persistence for the broker to be done for JDBC. Ideally this would also allows us to view historical statistics of the scheduler as per AMQ-5192.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)