You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by arkin <ar...@gmail.com> on 2016/06/17 20:49:23 UTC
Question about priorityURIs feature
In the following example from
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
failover:(tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616,tcp://remote:61616)?randomize=false&priorityBackup=true&priorityURIs=tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616
Will local1 always be tried before local2 or is the choice between the two
local urls random?
Once a connection to local2 is established, the client will not attempt to
connect to local1 unless the connection to local2 is disrupted. Is that
correct?
Thanks,
- Arkin
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Question about priorityURIs feature
Posted by Arkin Yetis <ar...@gmail.com>.
Thank you.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:06 AM Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote:
> Because "randomize=false", local1 will always be tried first, and local2
> will be tried only if local1 is unavailable.
>
> I'm not sure what the answer to your second question is, and unfortunately
> I don't have the ability right now to read the FailoverTransport source
> code to find out. Though of course you could if you have time.
>
> Tim
> On Jun 17, 2016 5:29 PM, "arkin" <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In the following example from
> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
>
>
> failover:(tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616,tcp://remote:61616)?randomize=false&priorityBackup=true&priorityURIs=tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616
>
> Will local1 always be tried before local2 or is the choice between the two
> local urls random?
> Once a connection to local2 is established, the client will not attempt to
> connect to local1 unless the connection to local2 is disrupted. Is that
> correct?
>
> Thanks,
> - Arkin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Question about priorityURIs feature
Posted by Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>.
Because "randomize=false", local1 will always be tried first, and local2
will be tried only if local1 is unavailable.
I'm not sure what the answer to your second question is, and unfortunately
I don't have the ability right now to read the FailoverTransport source
code to find out. Though of course you could if you have time.
Tim
On Jun 17, 2016 5:29 PM, "arkin" <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
In the following example from
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
failover:(tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616,tcp://remote:61616)?randomize=false&priorityBackup=true&priorityURIs=tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616
Will local1 always be tried before local2 or is the choice between the two
local urls random?
Once a connection to local2 is established, the client will not attempt to
connect to local1 unless the connection to local2 is disrupted. Is that
correct?
Thanks,
- Arkin
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.