You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Alexander Bell <Al...@j4fry.org> on 2009/04/18 09:04:16 UTC
Re: [Fwd: Re: JSR 314 Comments on AJAX specification (from MyFaces
development)]
Hi,
in my oppinion we shoudl think about to transfer only the elements which are
mentioned in "execute" parameter and the viewstate of course.
What do you think?
2009/4/13 Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>
> Hi,
>
> Just received this response from Roger Kitain on the PPS question. The pps
> option he suggests is included as a MyFaces extension in jira MYFACES-2174.
>
> Best Regards,
> Ganesh Jung
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: JSR 314 Comments on AJAX specification (from MyFaces
> development)
> Datum: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:12:14 -0400
> Von: Roger Kitain <Ro...@Sun.COM>
> An: Ganesh <ga...@j4fry.org>
> CC: jsr-314-comments@jcp.org
> Referenzen: <49...@J4Fry.org>
>
>
>
>
> Well... for simplicity (and what other frameworks were doing) the EG
> decided to do it this way.
> However, that's not to say we couldn't include an option that would
> indicate that only fields corresponding to
> execute list identifiers would be sent.
>
> Regards,
> -roger
>
>
> Ganesh wrote:
> > Hi to the JSR-314 team,
> >
> > We're currently working out the MyFaces 2.0 AJAX implementation of JSR
> > 314. During this process a question regarding the execute parameter of
> > jsf.ajax.request has come up: Why does the spec require all form
> > values to be submitted (In 14.1 the spec says for jsf.getViewState:
> > >>Encode the name and value for each input element of
> > FORM_ELEMENT.<<)? Most of the submitted parameters won't be used,
> > because only the components named in the execute parameter will be
> > processed in phase 2-4 (In 13.4.2 the spec says: >>The client also
> > sends a set of client ids of the components that must be processed
> > through the execute phase of the request processing lifecycle.<<).
> > Wouldn't it be faster to collect only the form values named in the
> > execute parameter?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ganesh Jung
>
>
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Alexander Bell
J4Fry OpenSource Community
Internet: http://www.j4fry.org
E-Mail: Alexander.Bell@j4fry.org
Webprofil: http://www.j4fry.org/alexanderbell.shtml
Re: [Fwd: Re: JSR 314 Comments on AJAX specification (from MyFaces
development)]
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>.
Yes but I would make this optional with default being off,
some component sets might rely on getting all form parameters
being passed down and fetch the values from the request manually...
But adding the functionality since j4fry already has working code
would make sense!
Werner
Alexander Bell schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> in my oppinion we shoudl think about to transfer only the elements which
> are mentioned in "execute" parameter and the viewstate of course.
> What do you think?
>
> 2009/4/13 Ganesh <ganesh@j4fry.org <ma...@j4fry.org>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just received this response from Roger Kitain on the PPS question.
> The pps option he suggests is included as a MyFaces extension in
> jira MYFACES-2174.
>
> Best Regards,
> Ganesh Jung
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: JSR 314 Comments on AJAX specification (from
> MyFaces development)
> Datum: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:12:14 -0400
> Von: Roger Kitain <Ro...@Sun.COM>
> An: Ganesh <ganesh@j4fry.org <ma...@j4fry.org>>
> CC: jsr-314-comments@jcp.org <ma...@jcp.org>
> Referenzen: <49...@J4Fry.org>
>
>
>
>
> Well... for simplicity (and what other frameworks were doing) the EG
> decided to do it this way.
> However, that's not to say we couldn't include an option that would
> indicate that only fields corresponding to
> execute list identifiers would be sent.
>
> Regards,
> -roger
>
>
> Ganesh wrote:
> > Hi to the JSR-314 team,
> >
> > We're currently working out the MyFaces 2.0 AJAX implementation
> of JSR
> > 314. During this process a question regarding the execute
> parameter of
> > jsf.ajax.request has come up: Why does the spec require all form
> > values to be submitted (In 14.1 the spec says for jsf.getViewState:
> > >>Encode the name and value for each input element of
> > FORM_ELEMENT.<<)? Most of the submitted parameters won't be used,
> > because only the components named in the execute parameter will be
> > processed in phase 2-4 (In 13.4.2 the spec says: >>The client also
> > sends a set of client ids of the components that must be processed
> > through the execute phase of the request processing lifecycle.<<).
> > Wouldn't it be faster to collect only the form values named in the
> > execute parameter?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ganesh Jung
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
> Alexander Bell
>
> J4Fry OpenSource Community
> Internet: http://www.j4fry.org
> E-Mail: Alexander.Bell@j4fry.org <ma...@j4fry.org>
> Webprofil: http://www.j4fry.org/alexanderbell.shtml
>