You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Geoff hendrey <ge...@yahoo.com> on 2005/11/17 07:27:33 UTC

Re: Latest JDO2 issues list

Issue 88  is resolved via some changed language in the
spec, no?

-geoff

--- Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM> wrote:

> Javadogs,
> 
> We're making great progress on the issues list.
> 
> Craig
> ï¿¼
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
> http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 
> 

__________________________________ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Re: Latest JDO2 issues list

Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.

Hi Geoff,

Good catch. It is resolved by changing the semantics of  
NonTransactionalWrite.

Thanks,

Craig

On Nov 16, 2005, at 10:27 PM, Geoff hendrey wrote:

> Issue 88  is resolved via some changed language in the
> spec, no?
>
> -geoff
>
> --- Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM> wrote:
>
>> Javadogs,
>>
>> We're making great progress on the issues list.
>>
>> Craig
>> ï¿¼
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
>> http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 		
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!