You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to repository@apache.org by "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@trysybase.com> on 2003/11/24 20:25:03 UTC

Test/Prototypical Repository

All,

As a way to force me to review the specification and attempt to implement
I've started a knock up repository at:

    http://www.apache.org/~ajack/testrepo

[If we think this is a good idea we can ask infrastructure@ for a location
we can all write to.]

Can folks tell me if this repository fits the specification? I had problem
with the top part.

regards

Adam
--
Experience Sybase Technology...
http://www.try.sybase.com

Re: Test/Prototypical Repository

Posted by Nick Chalko <ni...@chalko.com>.
Look reasonable to me.

Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

>All,
>
>As a way to force me to review the specification and attempt to implement
>I've started a knock up repository at:
>
>    http://www.apache.org/~ajack/testrepo
>
>[If we think this is a good idea we can ask infrastructure@ for a location
>we can all write to.]
>
>Can folks tell me if this repository fits the specification? I had problem
>with the top part.
>
>regards
>
>Adam
>--
>Experience Sybase Technology...
>http://www.try.sybase.com
>  
>

RE: Test/Prototypical Repository

Posted by Tim Anderson <tm...@netspace.net.au>.
> From: Ben Walding [mailto:ben@walding.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 9:03 AM
>
> I'm still not convinced that "binaries" is better than "binary" as a
> type directory.
>
> See my original comments that must have lost in the ether (section 2) -
> http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=repository@apa
> che.org&msgId=1124258
>
[snip]

"binaries" matches existing ASF practices, for both java and C
distributions.
Also, the directory name need not be reflected in the artifact extension -
the directory is there simply to group similar artifacts.

The proposals no longer refer to a 'type' directory.

E.g, for java artifacts [1], artifact-specifier is:
  artifact-specifier = java-artifact-specifier
  java-artifact-specifier = jar-artifact | war-artifact| rar-artifact
                            | ear-artifact | tld-artifact | javadoc-artifact
  jar-artifact = "jars" "/" versioned-artifact-name ".jar"
  war-artifact = "wars" "/" versioned-artifact-name ".war"
  rar-artifact = "rars" "/" versioned-artifact-name ".rar"
  ear-artifact = "ears" "/" versioned-artifact-name ".ear"
  tld-specifier = "tlds" "/" versioned-artifact-name ".tld"
  javadoc-artifact = "docs" "/" versioned-artifact-name
                     "-javadoc" "." arc-ext
  arc-ext = "tar.gz" | "zip" | "bzip2" | ...


-Tim

[1] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/JavaArtifacts

Re: Test/Prototypical Repository

Posted by Ben Walding <be...@walding.com>.
I'm still not convinced that "binaries" is better than "binary" as a 
type directory.

See my original comments that must have lost in the ether (section 2) - 
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=repository@apache.org&msgId=1124258

Cheers,

Ben

Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

>All,
>
>As a way to force me to review the specification and attempt to implement
>I've started a knock up repository at:
>
>    http://www.apache.org/~ajack/testrepo
>
>[If we think this is a good idea we can ask infrastructure@ for a location
>we can all write to.]
>
>Can folks tell me if this repository fits the specification? I had problem
>with the top part.
>
>regards
>
>Adam
>--
>Experience Sybase Technology...
>http://www.try.sybase.com
>
>  
>

RE: Test/Prototypical Repository

Posted by Tim Anderson <tm...@netspace.net.au>.
Not quite. The log4j-1.2.8.zip binary should be
log4j-1.2.8-bin.zip according to
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/JavaArtifacts

I would expect the log4j 1.2.8 release (with debug versions of
jars and binaries) to look something like:

apache/              (organisation)
  log4j/             (project)
    latest/ ->       symlink to 1.2.8
    1.2.8/           (version)
      binaries/
        log4j-1.2.8-bin.tar.gz
        log4j-1.2.8-bin.tar.gz.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-bin.tar.gz.pgp
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg-bin.tar.gz
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg-bin.tar.gz.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg-bin.tar.gz.pgp
        log4j-1.2.8-bin.zip
        log4j-1.2.8-bin.zip.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-bin.zip.pgp
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg-bin.zip
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg-bin.zip.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg-bin.zip.pgp
      source/
        log4j-1.2.8-src.tar.gz
        log4j-1.2.8-src.tar.gz.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-src.tar.gz.pgp
        log4j-1.2.8-src.zip
        log4j-1.2.8-src.zip.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-src.zip.pgp
      jars/
        log4j-1.2.8.jar
        log4j-1.2.8.jar.md5
        log4j-1.2.8.jar.pgp
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg.jar
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg.jar.md5
        log4j-1.2.8-dbg.jar.pgp
      pgp/
        KEYS
      licenses/
        LICENSES.txt

- Tim


> From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:ajack@trysybase.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 6:25 AM
> To: repository@apache.org
> Subject: Test/Prototypical Repository
>
>
> All,
>
> As a way to force me to review the specification and attempt to implement
> I've started a knock up repository at:
>
>     http://www.apache.org/~ajack/testrepo
>
> [If we think this is a good idea we can ask infrastructure@ for a location
> we can all write to.]
>
> Can folks tell me if this repository fits the specification? I had problem
> with the top part.
>
> regards
>
> Adam
> --
> Experience Sybase Technology...
> http://www.try.sybase.com
>
>