You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@openjpa.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog <j-...@novlog.com> on 2009/09/22 15:52:48 UTC

Geronimo versions

Hi,

the version of Geronimo look older in OpenJPA 2 compared to OpenJPA  
1.2.1 ...

One can found geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA8-20090902.182716-4.jar in  
OpenJPA 2
and geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in OpenJPA 1.2.1.

Is it normal ? What are the differences ?

Re: Geronimo versions

Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
We have also released a geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec-1.1.2.jar which is 
identical to the latest geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1.jar to help clarify 
this situation, in case there is ever a JPA 3.0 spec.....


-Donald


Michael Dick wrote:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
> 
> Short answer : this is normal.
> 
> Explanation : The orginal version of the geronimo-jpa spec jars was copied
> from the EJB specification (version 3.0 at the time). So JPA 1.0 was named
> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in Geronimo.
> 
> With JPA 2.0 the name changed to geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-xxx. I believe this
> is the 'more correct' format for the name, but it's really a question for
> the geronimo folks.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> -mike
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog <
> j-b.briaud@novlog.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> the version of Geronimo look older in OpenJPA 2 compared to OpenJPA 1.2.1
>> ...
>>
>> One can found geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA8-20090902.182716-4.jar in
>> OpenJPA 2
>> and geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in OpenJPA 1.2.1.
>>
>> Is it normal ? What are the differences ?
>>
> 

Re: Geronimo versions

Posted by Michael Dick <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jean-Baptiste,

Short answer : this is normal.

Explanation : The orginal version of the geronimo-jpa spec jars was copied
from the EJB specification (version 3.0 at the time). So JPA 1.0 was named
geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in Geronimo.

With JPA 2.0 the name changed to geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-xxx. I believe this
is the 'more correct' format for the name, but it's really a question for
the geronimo folks.

Hope this helps,
-mike


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog <
j-b.briaud@novlog.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the version of Geronimo look older in OpenJPA 2 compared to OpenJPA 1.2.1
> ...
>
> One can found geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA8-20090902.182716-4.jar in
> OpenJPA 2
> and geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in OpenJPA 1.2.1.
>
> Is it normal ? What are the differences ?
>